LETTER
Intramolecular Prins Reactions of Vinylcyclopropanes
3077
H
Interestingly, while alcohol 30 failed to undergo dehydra-
tion to 29 when resubmitted to the reaction conditions,
this transformation was readily accomplished by treat-
ment with the Burgess reagent. These observations can be
rationalized by the conformational analysis outlined in
Scheme 8. The sterically favored nucleophilic attack of
the alkene onto the activated ketone carbonyl can produce
two diastereomeric cis-hydrindanes 30 and 31
(R = CH2CH2OTs). The cis-hydrindane system is con-
formationally flexible, thereby enabling the two dia-
stereomeric alcohols to exist as a pair of conformers.9
Compound 31 can attain a conformation with the anti-
periplanar arrangement between the leaving group and al-
lylic hydrogen (31b), and, as a consequence, readily
forms diene 29 under acidic catalysis. This stereoelectron-
ic requirement for an E2-like elimination reaction cannot
be satisfied for isomer 30.10 Interestingly, although an
axial OH group in conformer 30a is antiperiplanar to the
C-5 proton on the cyclohexane ring, no cyclohexene for-
mation is observed under these reaction conditions. Evi-
dently, the reaction conditions are sufficiently mild such
that only regioselective dehydration involving elimination
of the activated allylic proton occurs. Transformation of
30 to 29 was instead affected by reaction with the Burgess
reagent via a syn-elimination mechanism.11
a, b
NTs
NTs
O
77% (2 steps)
OTs
H
H
O
22
32
Scheme 9 Reagents and conditions: a) potassium acrylate, DMF,
100 °C, 30 min; b) toluene, 150 °C, 17 h.
In summary, we have demonstrated the synthesis of semi-
cyclic dienes involving sulfonic acid-mediated intramo-
lecular Prins reactions of vinylcyclopropanes with
aldehydes and ketones followed by regioselective
dehydration reactions. The products of these reactions
bear a primary alkyl sulfonate group, which can be em-
ployed to introduce an internal dienophile for the prepara-
tion of complex polycyclic compounds by cycloaddition
chemistry.
Representative Procedure; Synthesis of 22
To a solution of 84 mg (0.26 mmol) of aldehyde 21 (R = H) in 50
mL of toluene was added 46 mg (0.24 mmol) of p-toluenesulfonic
acid monohydrate. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 30 min,
after which time TLC indicated complete consumption of starting
aldehyde. The reaction mixture was cooled down to r.t., and washed
with 10 mL of sat. aq NaHCO3. The organic layer was separated,
dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was
flash-chromatographed over silica gel (EtOAc–hexane, 1:2) to pro-
vide 83 mg (73%) of diene 22 as thick colorless oil. IR (neat): 2924,
O
OEt
OH
O
OH
1597, 1452, 1358, 1336, 1174, 1159, 1095 cm–1. H NMR (400
1
H
OEt
R
29
MHz, CDCl3): d = 2.34–2.45 (m, 6 H), 2.42 (s, 3 H), 2.45 (s, 3 H),
3.25–3.29 (m, 4 H), 4.02 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H), 5.33 (dt, J = 15.7, 6.9
Hz, 1 H), 5.70 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.97 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.90
(d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.33 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2
H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 21.6,
21.7, 28.4, 28.6, 32.3, 46.8, 47.5, 69.9, 121.1, 127.2, 127.9, 129.8,
129.9, 130.6, 133.1, 135.8, 136.8, 140.1, 143.4, 144.9. HRMS (EI):
m/z calcd for C24H29NO5S2 [M+]: 475.1487; found: 475.1485.
anti-elimination
H
H
R
31a
31b
O
OEt
OH
O
OH
Burgess
reagent
29
OEt
5
syn-elimination
H
H
Synthesis of 32
R
R
To a solution of 67 mg of diene 22 (0.14 mmol) in 2 mL of dry DMF
was added 77 mg (0.70 mmol) of potassium acrylate. The mixture
was heated at 100 °C for half an hour, after which time TLC indi-
cated complete consumption of starting tosylate. The reaction mix-
ture was cooled down to r.t., diluted with 10 mL of a 1:1 mixture of
EtOAc and hexane, and washed with four 3-mL portions of H2O.
The organic layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated
in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in 2 mL of toluene, hydro-
quinone (1 mg) was added, and the mixture was heated at 150 °C in
a sealed tube for 17 h. The reaction mixture was cooled down to r.t.,
concentrated in vacuo, and the residue was flash-chromatographed
over silica gel (EtOAc–hexane 1:1, then 2:1) to provide 40 mg (77%
yield) of tricycle 32 as thick colorless oil. IR (neat): 2960, 2920,
2852, 1724, 1259, 1157, 1091 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
d = 1.58–1.76 (m, 3 H), 1.82–1.93 (m, 2 H), 2.00 (ddd, J = 12.9, 4.5,
4.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.33–2.58 (m, 4 H), 2.42 (s, 3 H), 2.79 (ddd, J = 10.9,
6.8, 4.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.10 (ddd, J = 11.2, 10.3, 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.21 (ddd,
30a
30b
Scheme 8
Finally, we briefly examined the synthetic utility of the
diene products for the preparation of polycyclic com-
pounds. The cycloaddition reactions of unactivated semi-
cyclic dienes sometimes suffer from poor reactivity and
low regioselectivity.12 However, employing the primary
alkyl tosylate as a point of attachment of a dienophile fol-
lowed by intramolecular cycloaddition would address the
issues of reactivity and regioselectivity.13 With this in
mind, tosylate 22 was reacted with potassium acrylate
(Scheme 9). Subsequent heating of the resulting ester to
150 °C cleanly produced tricycle 32 in 77% overall yield.
The efficiency of this cycloaddition reaction is note- J = 12.8, 10.8, 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.26–3.35 (m, 2 H), 4.24 (ddd, J = 11.2,
10.3, 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.37 (ddd, J = 11.2, 4.1, 4.1 Hz, 1 H), 5.32 (s, 1
worthy because ester-tethered intramolecular Diels–Alder
H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.64 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR
cycloadditions are often problematic due to the unfavor-
(100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 21.7, 27.9, 32.0, 32.9, 33.9, 37.1, 38.0, 39.6,
able conformation of the ester moiety.14
47.7, 48.2, 68.8, 125.5, 127.3, 129.9, 136.1, 141.8, 143.4, 173.9.
HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C20H25NO4S [M+]: 375.1504; found:
375.1501.
Synlett 2005, No. 20, 3075–3078 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York