to the group of Prof. Y. Luo at the Royal Institute of Technology
in Sweden for its technical assistance in the theoretical calculations.
B.Z.T. thanks the support from the Cao Guangbiao Foundation
of the Zhejiang University.
Notes and references
{ Crystal data for 1: C26H19N, M = 345.42, monoclinic, P2(1), a =
˚
10.6320(18), b = 9.2506(15), c = 18.993(3) A, b = 105.409(3)u, V =
1800.8(5) A , Z = 4, Dc = 1.274 Mg m23, m = 0.073 mm21, F(000) = 728,
3
˚
T = 100(2) K, 2hmax = 25.00u, 10729 measured reflections, 4273
independent reflections (Rint = 0.0543), R1 = 0.0768, wR2 = 0.1450 (all
data), De 0.334 and 20.219 e A23. CCDC 289588. For crystallographic
˚
data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/b515798f
1 (a) S. J. Toal, K. A. Jones, D. Magde and W. C. Trogler, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2005, 127, 11661; (b) C. J. Bhongale, C.-W. Chang, C.-S. Lee,
E. W.-G. Diau and C.-S. Hsu, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 13472; (c)
Z. Xie, B. Yang, F. Li, G. Cheng, L. Liu, G. Yang, H. Xu, L. Ye,
M. Hanif, S. Liu, D. Ma and Y. Ma, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
14152; (d) J. Ohshita, K. Lee, M. Hashimoto, Y. Kunugi, Y. Harima,
K. Yamashita and A. Kunai, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 1891; (e) B. K. An,
S. K. Kwon, S. D. Jung and S. Y. Park, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124,
14410.
2 (a) C. P.-Y. Chan, M. Ha¨ußler, B. Z. Tang, Y. Q. Dong, K. Sin,
W.-C. Mak, D. Trau, M. Seydack and R. Renneberg, J. Immunolog.
Methods, 2004, 295, 111; (b) J. W. Y. Lam and B. Z. Tang, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2005, 38, 745.
3 (a) C. W. Tang and S. A. Van Slyke, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1987, 51, 913; (b)
A. Kraft, A. C. Grimsdale and A. B. Holmes, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
1998, 37, 402.
Fig. 2 (A) Molecular structures of two molecules of 1 in an asymmetric
unit and (B) perspective view of crystal packing of molecules of 1, some of
… …
whose N–H p and C–H p hydrogen bonds are shown by the dotted
4 (a) J. Luo, Z. Xie, J. W. Y. Lam, L. Cheng, H. Chen, C. Qiu,
H. S. Kwok, X. Zhan, Y. Liu, D. Zhu and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Commun.,
2001, 1740; (b) J. Chen, C. W. Law, J. W. Y. Lam, Y. Dong, S. M.
F. Lo, I. D. Williams, D. Zhu and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Mater., 2003, 15,
1535; (c) G. Yu, S. Yin, Y. Liu, J. Chen, X. Xu, X. Sun, D. Ma,
X. Zhan, Q. Peng, Z. Shuai, B. Z. Tang, D. Zhu, W. Fang and Y. Luo,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 6335; (d) B. Mi, Y. Dong, Z. Li, J. W.
Y. Lam, M. Haussler, H. Y. Sung, H. S. Kwok, Y. Dong, I. D. Williams,
Y. Liu, Y. Luo, Z. Shuai, D. B. Zhu and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Commun.,
2005, 3583; (e) Y. Dong, J. W. Y. Lam, Z. Li, H. Tong, Y. Dong,
X. Feng and B. Z. Tang, J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater., 2005, 15,
287.
lines (see Fig. S11 in the ESI for a more completed picture).
to a short range. The computation for 1 in this packing state
reveals four possible nonradiative transitions at 434, 447, 521 and
522 nm. The later two relaxation pathways are close to the lem of
its crystal (527 nm), suggesting that the weaker emission at 550 nm
in the amorphous state is the result of a partially quenched
emission.
Thanks to the geometric structures obtained from its XRD
data, the AIE phenomenon of 1 can be readily explained.
Unfortunately, however, similar calculation cannot be performed
on 2, because its single crystal structure is unavailable. The
ZINDO/S calculation based on its optimized single molecular
structure, however, reveals two possible nonradiative transitions at
435 and 472 nm, which are very close to its lem. These nonradiative
decay channels effectively quench its PL in the dilute solution, thus
making its isolated species nonemissive.
5 M. Freemantle, Chem. Eng. News, 2001, 79(41), 29.
6 (a) Z. Li, Y. Dong, B. Mi, Y. H. Tang, M. Ha¨ußler, H. Tong, Y. Dong,
J. W. Y. Lam, Y. Ren, H. Y. Sung, K. S. Wong, P. Gao, I. D. Williams,
H. S. Kwok and B. Z. Tang, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 10061; (b)
J. Chen, B. Xu, K. Yang, Y. Cao, H. Y. Sung, I. D. Williams and
B. Z. Tang, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 17086.
7 (a) H. Tong, Y. Dong, M. Ha¨ußler, Z. Li, B. Mi, H. S. Kwok and
B. Z. Tang, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 2006, 446, 183; (b) J. Chen, B. Xu,
X. Ouyang, B. Z. Tang and Y. Cao, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2004, 108, 7522.
8 L. D. Lu, R. Helgeson, R. M. Jones, D. McBranch and D. Whitten,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 483.
9 B. Z. Tang, Y. Geng, J. W. Y. Lam, B. Li, X. Jing, X. Wang, F. Wang,
A. Pakhomov and X. X. Zhang, Chem. Mater., 1999, 11, 1581.
10 All the absolute quantum yields (WF,a) of the AIE-active siloles are
higher than their relative ones (WF,r): for example, WF,a of 1-methyl-
pentaphenylsilole (85%)4c is 4-fold higher than its WF,r (21%)4a.
11 (a) S. Jayanty and T. P. Radhakrishnan, Chem. Eur. J., 2004, 10, 791;
(b) H. J. Tracy, J. L. Mullin, W. T. Klooster, J. A. Martin, J. Haug,
S. Wallace, I. Rudloe and K. Watts, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 2003.
12 Gaussian 98 (Revision A.7), Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
13 Hypercheme Release 7. Windows Molecular Modeling System,
Hypercube, Inc. and Autodesk, Inc. Developed by Hypercube, Inc.
14 C. Risko, G. P. Kushto, Z. H. Kafati and J. L. Bredas, J. Chem. Phys.,
2004, 121, 9031.
In summary, we have investigated the photophysical processes
of three novel fulvene derivatives. We have provned that 1 and 2
are AIE-active and demonstrated that the fulvene emission can be
tuned by changing the substituent structure and by varying the
aggregate morphology. We have further shown that the blockage
of the nonradiative channel of 1 at y527 nm is the cause of its
AIE behaviours. The fulvene-based AIE molecules may find an
array of high-tech applications as luminescent and sensory
materials in optical display, enviromental protection, and biome-
dical imagining.
This project was partially supported by the Hong Kong
Research Grants Council, the National Science Foundation and
the Ministry of Science and Technology of China. We are grateful
15 (a) N. DiCesare, M. Belletete, M. Leclerc and G. Durocher, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 1999, 103, 803; (b) N. DiCesare, M. Belletete, E. R. Garcia,
M. Leclerc and G. Durocher, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1999, 103, 3864.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006
Chem. Commun., 2006, 1133–1135 | 1135