A R T I C L E S
Nakamura et al.
2:1) of the residue gave 4 as a pale yellow oil (640 mg, 3.6 mmol,
75%). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.00 (s, 1H, Im), 6.86 (s, 1H, Im), 3.70 (s,
3H, Me), and 0.25 (s, 9H, TMS) ppm.
was pumped by a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (Clark MXR model ORC-
1000), a pulse stretcher/compressor, an optical parametric amplifier
(Clark MXR OPA), and an optical detection system. A femtosecond
Ti:sapphire oscillator pumped by a cw Nd:YVO4 laser (Coherent, Verdi)
produces a train of ∼80-fs mode-locked pulses with an averaged power
of 650 mW at 800 nm. The amplified output beam regenerated by
chirped pulse amplification (CPA) had a pulse width of ca. 150 fs and
a power of ca. 1 W at a repetition rate of 1 kHz, which was divided
into two parts by a 1:1 beam splitter. One part was color-tuned for the
pump beam by an optical parametric generation and amplification
(OPG-OPA). The resulting laser pulse had a temporal width of ∼150
fs in the vis/IR range. The pump beam was focused to a spot diameter
of ∼1 mm, and the laser fluence was adjusted, using a variable neutral-
density filter. The other part was focused onto a flowing water cell to
generate a white-light continuum, which was again split into two parts.
One part of the white-light continuum was overlapped with the pump
beam at the sample to probe the transient, while the other part of the
white-light continuum was passed through the sample without overlap-
ping the pump beam. The time delay between pump and probe beams
was controlled by making the pump beam travel along a variable optical
delay line. The white-light continuum beams after the sample were
sent through an appropriate interference filter and then were detected
by two photodiodes. The outputs from the two photodiodes at the
selected wavelength were processed by a combination of a boxcar
averager and a lock-in amplifier, to calculate the absorption difference
at the desired time delay between pump and probe pulses. Two-photon
absorption cross sections were measured by an open-aperture Z-scan
method using the setup reported elsewhere.18b
2-Ethynyl-1-methylimidazole (5). To a solution of 2-trimethyl-
silylethynyl-1-methylimidazole (4) (300 mg, 1.7 mmol) in MeOH (15
mL) was added a small portion of aqueous KOH solution. After being
stirred for 30 min at room temperature, the solution was diluted with
water and was extracted with ethyl acetate. The combined organic layer
was dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated. Silica gel column chromatog-
raphy (ethyl acetate:hexane, 3:1) gave 7 as a pale yellow oil (152 mg,
1
1.4 mmol, 85%). H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.04 (s, 1H, Im), 6.90 (s, 1H,
Im), 3,74 (s, 3H, Me), and 3.31 (s, 1H, CtCH) ppm.
1,4-Bis(1-methylimidazol-2-ylethynyl)benzene (G1). To a mixture
of 1,4-diiodobenzene (40 mg, 0.12 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (25 mg, 0.031
mmol), and CuI (6.9 mg, 0.031 mmol) was added a solution of 5 (32
mg, 0.31 mmol) in dry Et3N (1 mL) and dry THF (1 mL). The solution
was deoxygenated via freeze-pump-thaw cycles and was stirred at
room temperature under Ar atmosphere. After 1 day, the resulting
mixture was filtrated and evaporated. The residue was extracted with
ethyl acetate and washed with water. The combined organic layer was
dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated. Silica gel column chromatography
(ethyl acetate) of the residue gave G1 as yellow brown solids (10.1
mg, 0.035 mmol, 29%). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.55 (s, 4H, Ph), 7.11 (s,
2H, Im), 6.96 (s, 2H, Im), and 3.80 (s, 6H, Me) ppm; (toluene-d8) δ
7.17 (s, 4H, Ph), 7.12 (s, 2H, Im), 6.23 (s, 2H, Im), and 2.91 (s, 6H,
Me) ppm. ESI-MS m/z 287.120 [M + H]+; calcd for C18H15N4+, m/z
287.129.
5,15-Bis(1-methylimidozol-2-yl)-10,20-dihexylporphyrin (G2).
2-Formyl-1-methylimidazole (200 mg, 1.8 mmol), meso-hexyldipyr-
romethane (418 mg, 1.8 mmol), and NaCl (53 mg, 0.9 mmol) were
dissolved in CHCl3 (189 mL). After the solution was purged with N2
for 15 min, TFA (0.2 mL, 2.7 mmol) was added, and the resulting
solution was stirred at room temperature with shielding from light under
nitrogen atmosphere. After 6 h, p-chloranil (664 mg, 2.7 mmol) was
added to the reaction mixture, and the solution was stirred for 12 h.
The reaction mixture was then neutralized with triethylamine, and
the solvent was evaporated. The residue was dissolved in CHCl3 and
passed through a silica gel column with CHCl3 to CHCl3/acetone
(10:3) as eluents. This procedure was repeated three times to give pure
G2 as red-purple solids (48 mg, 0.075 mmol, 8.3%). 1H NMR (toluene-
d8) δ 9.26, 9.23 (each d, J ) 4.8 Hz, 4H, Por-â), 8.83, 8.76 (each d,
J ) 4.6 Hz, 4H, Por-â), 7.74, 7.67 (each s, 2H, Im-H4), 6.94, 6.88
(each s, 2H, Im-H5), 4.77, 4.73 (each m, 4H, Hex-R), 2.83, 2.80 (each
s, 6H, Im-N-Me), 2.48, 2.43 (each m, 4H, Hex-â), 1.68 (m, 4H × 2,
Hex-γ), 1.42 (m, 4H × 2, Hex-δ), 1.36 (m, 4H × 2, Hex-ꢀ), 0.95 (m,
6H × 2, Hex-Me), -2.40, and -2.45 (each br, 2H, Por-NH) ppm;
HR-ESI-MS m/z 639.3924 [M + H]+; calcd for C40H47N8+, m/z
639.3918.
STM Measurements. Clean flat Cu(100) surfaces were obtained
by Ar+-ion sputtering and annealing (580 °C) cycles for a substrate.
The porphyrin sheet molecules dissolved into CHCl3 were deposited
by spraying ca. 0.5 µL of the solution onto the substrate in a vacuum
(10-6 mbar) using a pulse injection method, which is suited for
deposition of large fragile molecules with escaping decomposition often
encountered in sample deposition from the gas phase. In-situ STM
measurements were performed at room temperature in ultrahigh vacuum
(<10-10 mbar) with a home-built STM by using an electrochemical
etched Pt/Ir tip. STM image was obtained in constant height mode.
Steady-State UV-Vis Absorption Spectroscopy. The samples were
prepared in micromolar concentrations in CHCl3 (spectroscopic grade).
Absorption spectra were obtained with a Shimadzu UV-3100PC
spectrometer at room temperature.
Magnetic Circular Dichroism (MCD) Spectroscopy. The MCD
spectrum was recorded in the UV-vis-near-IR region (300-900 nm)
with a JASCO J-725 spectrodichrometer equipped with a JASCO
electromagnet that produces parallel and antiparallel magnetic fields
of up to 1.09 T, and in the near-IR region (700-2000 nm) with a
JASCO J-730 spectrodichrometer equipped with a JASCO electromag-
net that produces magnetic fields of up to 1.5 T. Pyridine-d5 was used
as solvent to eliminate solvent absorption bands in the near-IR region.
The MCD spectrum was combined in a region where there were no
intense absorption bands. The magnitude of the MCD signal is
expressed in terms of molar ellipticity per tesla [θ]M deg mol-1 dm3
cm-1 T-1
.
Computational Details. All calculations were carried out using the
Gaussian 03 program.26 All structures were optimized with Becke’s
three-parameter hybrid exchange functional and the Lee-Yang-Parr
correlation functional (B3LYP)27 without symmetry restriction, employ-
ing the LANL2DZ basis set for zinc atom, and 6-31G* basis set for
the other atoms (denoted as 631LAN). The NICS values were obtained
with the GIAO method at B3LYP/631LAN level. The ring centers were
designated at the nonweighted means of the carbon and nitrogen
coordinates on the conjugate pathways. The ground-state structure of
3 with D4h symmetry was optimized at the level of B3LYP/6-31G*,
where the tert-butyl groups were omitted and replaced with hydrogen
atoms. With this optimized structure, the 40 excitation energies and
oscillator strengths were calculated using time-dependent Hartree-Fock
theory (TDHF) with ZINDO/S Hamiltonian.
Acknowledgment. The work at Kyoto was partly supported
by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Area (No.
16033231, Reaction Control of Dynamic Complexes) from the
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technol-
ogy, Japan, and 21st Century COE on Kyoto University Alliance
for Chemistry. The work at Tohoku was supported by the COE
project, Giant Molecules and Complex Systems, 2005, and a
Transient Absorption Spectroscopy. The dual-beam femtosecond
time-resolved transient absorption spectrometer consisted of a self-
mode-locked femtosecond Ti:sapphire oscillator (Coherent, MIRA), a
Ti:sapphire regenerative amplifier (Clark MXR model TRA-1000) that
(26) Frisch, M. J.; et al. Gaussian 03, revision B.05; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh,
PA, 2003.
(27) (a) Becke, A. D. Phys. ReV. A 1988, 38, 3098-3100. (b) Lee, C.; Yang,
W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785-789.
9
4126 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 12, 2006