Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
of 2as and 2at, the byproducts 4-nitrophenyl trifluorometha-
trifluoromethanesulfonyl group has a cationic character was
nesulfonate (3; 26%) and methyl 4-(((trifluoromethyl)sulfo-
nyl)oxy)benzoate (4; 7%), respectively, were isolated,
together with 2-iodophenyl trifluoromethanesulfonate (5; 29
and 5% yield, respectively). To account for the formation of 3
and 4, electron-deficient diaryliodonium salts probably pro-
ceeded through two competing reaction pathways by either
direct substitution with the anion or intramolecular rear-
rangement.[14] Gratifyingly, when the symmetric diaryliodo-
nium salts 1au was employed in the reaction, one of the OTf
substituents was retained and the product 2au was isolated in
84% yield. The reaction is also compatible with diaryliodo-
nium salts containing naphthalene moieties (2av–aw). The
substrate 1ax, bearing a bulky aryl group with 2,4,6-triiso-
propyl substituents, furnished the diaryl ether 2ax in 83%
yield, and the structure of 2ax was verified by the X-ray
crystallographic analysis.[15] We next turned our attention to
the other aryl moiety (Ar1) of the diaryliodonium salts. The
reactions all went smoothly to afford the desired products
2ba–ga in nearly quantitative yields when either the methyl,
tert-butyl, or halogen substituents were positioned at either
the meta or para position to the iodine. The trifluoromethyl-
substituted 2ha was obtained in a good yield of 91%.
Interestingly, substrates bearing electron-withdrawing
groups, such as NO2 or an ester group, furnished the products
of 2ia, 2ka, and 2la in 72–85% yields without the detection of
byproducts, which was not the case in the formation of 2as
and 2at. Importantly, the reaction also led to the polyhalo-
genated ortho-iodo diaryl ethers 2ma–qa in excellent yields,
ethers which are useful as fine chemicals.
suggested by 1H and 19F NMR analyses and ESI-TOF spectra
of an isolated mixture of 1a upon treatment under basic
conditions.[17] An extremely unstable compound was observed
in polar form by thin-layer chromatography when the
reaction was conducted in either MeCN at À308C or in
water at 258C, and it was converted into 2aa immediately. The
base was essential to the reaction for trapping the anion and
accelerating dissociation of the sulfonyl group. The reaction in
Scheme 2c demonstrates that the p-toluenesulfonyl cation is
the leaving group in the reaction, and tosylmorpholine (6) was
obtained in 73% yield, which is the same as that of 2aa.
Next, ortho-iodo diaryl ether products as a family of
synthetically versatile synthons were readily converted into
important aromatic building blocks. Taking advantage of
À
highly reactive C I bond of 2ab, we performed a series of
subsequent synthetic manipulations to transform 2ab into
functional molecules (Scheme 3).[13b,18] For example, treat-
ment of 2ab with nBuLi and B(OMe)3 led to the correspond-
ing boric acid 7. A Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction
provided the diarylalkyne product 8. Ullmann reaction of
2ab with either indole or phenol as nucleophiles, in the
presence of copper catalysts, gave the N-aryl indole 9 and
diaryl ether 14, respectively. Suzuki coupling of 2ab with 4-
tolylboronic acid generated the biaryl 10. Intramolecular
À
C H activation for coupling reaction was attempted to
furnish dibenzofuran (11). Additionally, copper-catalyzed
arylation of diethyl malonate with 2ab formed 12 in good
yield of 88%. Palladium-catalyzed Buchwald–Hartwig cross-
coupling in the synthesis of the diaryl amine 13 was
accomplished with aniline.
Mechanistic studies on possible intermediates in aryla-
tions involving hypervalent iodine reagents have been
recently documented.[14,16] A crossover experiment of the
reaction between 1ah and 1ka revealed the intramolecular
manner of the reaction (Scheme 2a). The aryl migration
products are proposed to be generated through a sulfonyl-
directed nucleophilic aromatic substitution pathway. As
shown in Scheme 2b, the transition state wherein the
Scheme 3. Versatility of 2ab in further transformations. a) 1. nBuLi,
THF, À788C; 2. B(OMe)3; 3. HCl, RT. b) Phenylacetylene, Pd(PPh3)4/
CuI, Et3N, reflux. c) Indole, CuI, K2CO3, DMF, 1208C. d) 4-Tolylboronic
acid, Pd(PPh3)4, K2CO3, DMF, 1008C. e) Pd(OAc)2/PCy3-HBF4, K2CO3,
DMA, 1308C; f) Diethyl malonate, CuI/2-pincolinic acid, Cs2CO3, 1,4-
dioxane, 258C. g) PhNH2, Pd(OAc)2/(tBu)3P, NaOtBu, tol., 1008C.
h) Phenol, CuI/2-picolinic acid, K3PO4, DMSO, 958C. DMA=N,N-
dimethylacetamide, DMF=N,N-dimethylformamide, DMSO=dimethyl
sulfoxide, THF=tetrahydrofuran.
Scheme 2. a) Crossover experiment. b) Proposed mechanism for
migration. c) Investigations on the mechanism.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1 – 6
ꢀ 2018 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!