C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 1. (A) EPR spectrum of 5a with g1 ) 2.96, g2 ) 1.95, and g3 )
1.88 (in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran glass at 20 K, 9.474 GHz). (B) Cyclic
voltammetry of 5a (0.40 M [nBuN4][ClO4] in THF, scan rate ) 100 mV/s
(full), 500 mV/s (inset)) and [PhBPiPr3]FetNAd (0.40 M [nBuN4][PF6] in
THF).
electrons (S ) 1), consistent with the ground state electronic
configuration (dz2)2(dxy)1(dx2-y2)1(dxz)0(dyz)0.
We undertook a crystallographic investigation of 5a and 6a to
confirm their connectivities and to examine their Fe-N bond
distances and Fe-Nimide-C bond angles for comparison with
[PhBPR ]FetNR imides. For the case of 5a, the crystals that we
3
obtained were twinned, regardless of the method employed for
crystallization. Its structure could nonetheless be refined isotropi-
cally to confirm its pseudotetrahedral geometry (see SI). Evident
from its isotropic structure is an expectedly short Fe-Nimide bond
distance (1.63 Å) and a nearly linear C-N3-Fe angle (169°).3
Owing to the thermal instability of 6a, its XRD analysis proved
to be a more challenging experiment. Single green crystals could
be obtained by storing a THF/petroleum ether solution at -78 °C
for several days, and XRD analysis confirmed its proposed
assignment (see SI). To obtain a better quality data set, we set out
to prepare an analogue of 6a of greater kinetic stability. We thus
pursued a [PhBPtBu2(pz′)]- derivative substituted by methyl groups
at the 3 and 5 positions. The required precursor ([PhBPtBu2(pzMe2)]-
Tl, 2b) and an analogous series of iron complexes (3b-6b, Scheme
1) were readily prepared by the same procedures described above.
The imide cation 6b indeed exhibits far greater thermal stability
than 6a. Its cyclic voltammetry is very similar to that of 6a, and
the FeIV/III redox couple is reversible even at slower scan rates (e.g.,
100 mV/s). 6b can even be isolated in pure form at ambient
temperature (86.7% yield) and manipulated without appreciable
degradation for short periods. X-ray data sets were obtained for
5b (disordered structure; see SI) and 6b. The anisotropically refined
X-ray crystal structure of {[PhBPtBu2(pzMe2)]FeIVtNAd}{B(ArF)4}
6b is shown in Figure 2. The structure reveals the anticipated
pseudotetrahedral iron cation and its tetra(aryl)borate counteranion.
The Fe-N3 bond distance (1.634(4) Å) and the Fe-Nimide-C bond
angle (176.2(3)°) are similar to the parameters obtained for
crystallographically characterized [PhBP3]Fe imides in the +3 and
+2 oxidation states.3 Assuming that the two unpaired electrons of
6b reside in relatively nonbonding d-orbitals, as predicted from
simple MO considerations,2b,3c the Fe-N bond should retain its
triple bond character (i.e., FeIVtNR+) and the Fe-N distance is
therefore not expected to change to a large extent upon oxidation.
In summary, whereas iron imides had been previously obtained
Figure 2. Anisotropically refined thermal ellipsoid representation of
{[PhBPtBu2(pzMe )]FeIVtNAd}{B(ArF)4} (6b); two molecules of THF and
2
all hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity; Fe-N3 1.634(4) Å; Fe-
N3-C1 176.2(3)°.
symmetry of the [PhBPtBu2(pz′)] ligand, and the compatibility of
this lower symmetry with a d4 triplet electronic configuration.
Acknowledgment. We acknowledge Larry Henling for crystal-
lographic assistance, and Dr. Mark Mehn for assistance with EPR
spectroscopy. We thank the NIH for financial support (GM 070757),
and N.P.M. is grateful for an NSF graduate fellowship.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental pro-
cedures for 1, 2a,b-6a,b, all characterization data, and crystallographic
details for 3a, 5a, 5b, 6a, and 6b. This material is available free of
References
(1) (a) Li, Z.; Conser, K. R.; Jacobsen, E, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
5326. (b) Evans, D. A.; Faul, M. M.; Bilodeau, M. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 2742. (c) DuBois, J.; Tomooka, C. S.; Hong, J.; Carreira, E.
M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 364. (d) Wigley, D. E. In Progress in
Inorganic Chemistry; Karlin, K. D., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York,
1994; Vol. 42, pp 239-482. (e) Eikey, R. A.; Abu-Omar, M. M. Coord.
Chem. ReV. 2003, 243, 83.
(2) For recent examples, see: (a) Mindiola, D. J.; Hillhouse, G. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4623. (b) Jenkins, D. M.; Betley, T. A.; Peters, J.
C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5272. (c) Eikey, R. A.; Khan, S. I.;
Abu-Omar, M. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3592. (d) Dai, X.;
Kapoor, P.; Warren, T. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4798. (e) Hu,
X.; Meyer, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16322.
(3) (a) Brown, S. D.; Betley, T. A.; Peters, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 322. (b) Betley, T. A.; Peters, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
10782. (c) Brown, S. D.; Peters, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4538.
(d) Brown, S. D.; Peters, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1913.
(4) Fe(IV) imides have been implicated as intermediates in nitrene transfer
reactions: (a) Lucas, R. L.; Powell, D. R.; Borovik, A. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 11596. (b) Jensen, M. P.; Mehn, M. P.; Que, L., Jr. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4357.
(5) For recent non-heme iron examples, see: (a) Rohde, J.-U.; In, J.-H.; Lim,
M. H.; Brennessel, W. W.; Bukowski, M. R.; Stubna, A.; Mu¨nck, E.;
Nam, W.; Que, L., Jr. Science 2003, 299, 1037. (b) Klinker, E. J.; Kaiser,
J.; Brennessel, W. W.; Woodrum, N. L.; Cramer, C. J.; Que, L., Jr. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3690. (c) Bukowski, M. R.; Koehntop, K. D.;
Stubna, A.; Bominaar, E. L.; Halfen, J. A.; Mu¨nck, E.; Nam, W.; Que,
L., Jr. Science 2005, 310, 1000. (d) Grapperhaus, C. A.; Mienert, B.; Bill,
E.; Weyhermuller, T.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 5306.
(6) Verma, A. K.; Nazif, T. N.; Achim, C.; Lee, S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 11013.
in the +3 and +2 oxidation states using [PhBPR ]Fe systems, we
3
now find that imides in the +3 and +4 oxidation states are acces-
sible using [PhBPtBu2(pz′)]Fe systems. It is remarkable that termi-
nally bonded L3FetNR species have now been characterized in
three distinct oxidation states using phosphine-borate ligands given
the paucity of such species more generally. The cause of the in-
creased stability of the FeIVtNR linkage in the [PhBPtBu2(pz′)]Fe
system described herein is an interesting issue and might in part
be attributed to (i) a cathodic shift in the FeIV/III potential by compar-
(7) A related bis(pyrazole)(phosphine)borate ligand was reported recently:
Casado, M. A.; Hack, V.; Camerano, J. A.; Ciriano, M. A.; Tejel, C.;
Oro, L. A. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 9122.
(8) In this paper, we adopt the ligand abbreviations [PhBPtBu2(pz)] and
[PhBPtBu2(pzMe2)] to refer to a parent pyrazole and a 3,5-dimethyl-
substituted derivative, respectively. [PhBPtBu2(pz′)] is a general notation
to represent any pyrazole derivative.
(9) (a) Sur, S. K. J. Magn. Reson. 1989, 82, 169. (b) Evans, D. F. J. Chem.
Soc. 1959, 2003.
ison to previous [PhBPR ]Fe imide systems, which in turn might
3
lend added stability to the ligand borate unit and/or (ii) to the lower
JA0604358
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 15, 2006 4957