Konno et al.
SCHEME 1
SCHEME 2
SCHEME 3
In particular, the use of Pd2(dba)3CHCl3 + 4PPh3 led to
optimum regioselectivity (entry 10). On the contrary, a bulky
and monodentate trialkylphosphine ligand, like PCy3, decreased
the regioselectivity significantly. More interestingly, bidentate
ligands, such as dppe, dppf, and BINAP, resulted in a high
reverse regioselectivity, the R-product 7a being afforded in 75-
97% yields.
With the optimized reaction conditions (Table 1, entry 10),
we investigated the present palladium-catalyzed formate reduc-
tion of various types of allyl mesylates 2 as shown in Scheme
4 and Table 2.
Generally, all substrates could participate nicely in the
reaction to give the reduction products 1 and 7 in excellent
combined yields. The reaction of allyl mesylate bearing para-
and meta-substituted aromatic rings as R1 proceeded in a highly
regioselective manner (entries 1, 2, and 4); however, ortho-
substitution on the aromatic ring in R1 slightly decreased the
regioselectivity (entries 3 and 5). The use of an alkyl group as
R1 also led to a high regioselectivity. It should be noted that
various types of fluoroalkyl groups did not influence on the
yield and regioselectivity.
Formate Reduction of R-Substituted-Allyl Mesylates. We
next investigated the palladium-catalyzed formate reduction of
(R-substituted)allyl esters 2i-o, which could be easily prepared
as described in Schemes 5 and 6. Thus, 2i,j,l-n could be
prepared from 3 by a similar procedure as shown in Scheme 2,
though phosphonium salts 8 were used for the Wittig reaction,
instead of Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons reagents (Scheme 5).
The fluoroalkylated allylic mesylate with a phenyl group as R2
was too unstable to be prepared, so that the corresponding allyl
acetate 2k was used for the next formate reduction. On the other
hand, propargylic alcohol 9, which could be prepared from
2-bromo-3,3,3-trifluoropropene 10 according to the literature,6
was reduced with an excess amount of Red-Al followed by
treatment of I2, leading to vinyl iodide 11. The Suzuki-Miyaura
cross-coupling reaction of 117 and the subsequent mesylation
of the resultant allylic alcohol 12 gave the desired allylic
mesylate 2o in good yield (Scheme 6).
2 in good combined yields. Difluoromethylated allyl mesylate
was too unstable to be prepared, so that the corresponding allyl
carbonate 2g was used for the next reaction.
Treatment of 2a (E/Z ) 76/24) with HCO2-NEt3H+ (1.2
equiv) in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 in THF at room temperature
for 24 h afforded the desired γ-product 1a in 66% yield
preferentially, together with 20% of the R-product 7a (Scheme
3, Table 1, entry 1). The reaction in benzene resulted in a slight
increase of the chemical yield (entry 2). In contrast to these
solvents, more polar solvents, such as 1,4-dioxane and DMF,
were found to be less effective for the reaction at room
temperature, 1a being obtained in only 45% and 25% yields,
respectively (entries 3 and 4). Interestingly, higher reaction
temperatures caused a significant increase of the yield as shown
in entries 5-8. In particular, the reaction in DMF at 80 °C for
2 h gave 1a in 89% yield (entry 8).
We also examined the effect of the ligand on palladium as
shown in entries 9-17. When a phosphine ligand was not
employed, 7a was formed preferentially (entry 9). A series of
monodentate phosphine ligands, such as PPh3, P(o-Tol)3,
P(OPh)3, and P(n-Bu)3, were found to be very effective to afford
the desired 1a in high yields with a satisfactory regioselectivity.
(3) For the study of the fluorine-containng π-allylpalladium complex,
see: (a) Konno, T.; Takehana, T.; Ishihara, T.; Yamanaka, H. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2004, 2, 93-98. (b) Okano, T.; Matsubara, H.; Kusukawa, T.; Fujita,
M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2003, 676, 43-46. (c) Konno, T.; Nagata, K.;
Ishihara, T.; Yamanaka, H. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1768-1775. (d) Konno,
T.; Ishihara, T.; Yamanaka, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8467-8472.
(e) Hanzawa, Y.; Ishizawa, S.; Kobayashi, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1988,
36, 4209-4212. (f) Hanzawa, Y.; Ishizawa, S.; Ito, H.; Kobayashi, Y.;
Taguchi, T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1990, 394-395.
(6) (a) Yamazaki, T.; Mizutani, K.; Kitazume, T. J. Org. Chem. 1995,
60, 6046-6056. (b) Mizutani, K.; Yamazaki, T.; Kitazume, T. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 51-52.
(4) For the transition-metal-catalyzed formate reduction, see: (a) Lautens,
M.; Paquin, J.-F. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3391-3394. (b) Hayashi, T. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 195-202. (c) Fuji, K.; Sakurai, M.; Kinoshita,
T.; Kawabata, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6323-6326. (d) Tsuji, J.;
Manda, T. Synthesis 1996, 1-24. (e) Hayashi, T.; Iwamuara, H.; Uozumi,
Y.; Matsumoto, Y.; Ozawa, F. Synthesis 1994, 526-532.
(7) (a) Konno, T.; Daitoh, T.; Noiri, A.; Chae, J.; Ishihara, T.; Yamanaka,
H. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 9391-9404. (b) Konno, T.; Daitoh, T.; Noiri,
A.; Chae, J.; Ishihara, T.; Yamanaka, H. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 933-936. (c)
Wang, J.-J.; Ling, W.; Lu, L. J. Fluorine Chem. 2001, 111, 241-246. (d)
Qing, F.-L.; Ying, J.; Zhang, Y. J. Fluorine Chem. 2000, 101, 31-33. (e)
Pan, R.-Q.; Liu, X.-X.; Deng, M.-Z. J. Fluorine Chem. 1999, 95, 167-
170. (f) Prie´, G.; Thibonnet, J.; Abarbri, M.; Ducheˆne, A.; Parrain, J.-L.
Synlett 1998, 839-840.
(5) Kimura, M.; Yamazaki, T.; Kitazume, T.; Kubota, T. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 4651-4654.
3546 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 71, No. 9, 2006