Synthesis of Carpanone-like Molecules
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 3
erodimer in the solid phase was significant not only because it
demonstrated that the key carpanone dimerization reaction could
be performed in resin, but it also transformed the dimerization
reaction into a diversity-generating step. Thus, many scaffolds
could be produced from the same resin-bound o-hydroxystyrene
simply by varying the structure of the o-hydroxystyrene
introduced in solution.
A screen of different linkers (R1) and spacers (R2) was
conducted to optimize the yield of heterodimer 3 relative to 4,
the undesired product of intra-resin homodimerization of 1. The
optimal combination, depicted in Scheme 2, proved general.
Five unique electron-deficient o-hydroxystyrenes were found
to couple with 1 to yield resin-bound heterodimers that were
isolated in 77-81% yield after cleavage from the resin. Analyses
of the reaction products indicated that the only significant
byproduct of these reactions was undesired homodimer 4, which
was produced in 10-15% yield.
The presence of homodimer byproduct, however, complicated
the use of this reaction as the basis for a split-and-pool library
synthesis. At maximal resin loading levels of 1 (1.1 mmol/g
resin), formation of homodimer 4 effectively suppressed het-
erodimerization. At a lower loading level of 1 (0.15 mmol/g
resin), heterodimer 3 was favored over 4 by the ratio of 5.3:1,
but this loading level was considered to be too low to support
multiple biological screens using the ICCB16 standard protocols
for library formatting and analysis.17 Furthermore, the unwanted
homodimer present in each resin bead following oxidative
coupling would be retained throughout the split-and-pool
synthesis and would contaminate the stock solutions of final
library compounds.
With these considerations in mind, we elected to use a
homodimer similar to 4 as a scaffold for our library synthesis.
This strategy offers several benefits over a heterodimeric library.
A scaffold formed in a solid-phase homodimerization would
not suffer from the impurity problems that plagued our
heterodimeric scaffolds. Furthermore, loading levels could be
significantly increased over those used for heterodimerizations
since there would be no need to spatially separate the resin-
bound substrates in order to minimize intra-bead homodimer-
ization.18 Finally, the diethylsilyl linker and amide spacer, which
were developed empirically solely to enhance selectivity for
heterodimerization, could be replaced with a more robust
diisopropylsilyl linker19 and an all-carbon spacer, thus simplify-
ing resin preparation. The primary drawback to this approach
is that, unlike the analogous situation with heterodimeric
scaffolds, the dimerization reaction itself could not be used as
a diversification step to yield multiple scaffolds20 since there is
only one possible homodimer that can be formed from a resin-
bound monomer. We envisioned that the consequences of this
modification could be minimized if allylated phenol 5 were used
as the monomer (Scheme 3). After formation of homodimer 6,
a selective deallylation would reveal a free phenol (7) which
would provide a handle for diversification, thereby recapturing
some of the diversification potential at this position. We also
hoped to utilize the remaining allyl group as a component of
reactions designed to alter the scaffold structure of 7 and yield
multiple new scaffolds.
The synthesis of resin-bound racemic homodimer is depicted
in Scheme 4. Hydroquinone was monoallylated to yield 8, which
was formylated under basic conditions to produce aldehyde 9.21
An E-selective Wittig reaction22 gave acid 10, which was
reduced to alcohol 11 with lithium aluminum hydride. Direct
resin loading of 11 gave a small amount of undesired attachment
through the phenol hydroxyl, so the phenol was selectively
protected as the acetate (12) prior to resin loading.23 Protode-
silylation of the resin19 with triflic acid, addition of 12, and
deprotection of the resulting resin-bound methyl ester with
piperidine yielded the loaded resin 13 (loading level ) 1.05
mmol/g resin).
Our attempts to prepare resin-bound homodimer 18 directly
via PhI(OAc)2-mediated24 dimerization of silyl-protected 14
(step g) with 13 were not successful. The attempted dimerization
proceeded cleanly;25 however, the mass recovery of cleaved
homodimer 16 was only 50% based on the desired incorporation
of one molecule of 14 per molecule of 13. The most likely
explanation for this occurrence is that exclusive intra-bead
homodimerization occurred producing cross-linked 15. Indeed,
treatment of 13 with PhI(OAc)2 in the absence of 14 gave a
quantitative yield of homodimer 16 after resin cleavage,
presumably via 15.
Intra-bead homodimerization was unacceptable because it
reduced the loading level of the resin by 50%. To avoid this
complication, we loaded onto the resin a mixture of molecules
17a and 17b. 17a and 17b were prepared by a solution-phase
homodimerization of 11 to produce 16 (step j) and subsequent
monosilylation. Loading took place successfully to yield the
(16) Institute for Chemistry and Cell Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge,
MA.
(17) The standard resin used by the ICCB is a derivative of 500 µm polystyrene
resin with a diisopropyl-p-methoxyphenylsilyl terminus. See: (a) Sternson,
S. M.; Louca, J. B.; Wong, J. C.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 1740-1747. (b) Spring, D. R.; Krishnan, S.; Blackwell, H. E.;
Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1354-1363. (c) Blackwell,
H. E.; Pe´rez, L.; Stavenger, R. A.; Tallarico, J. A.; Eatough, E. C.; Foley,
M. A.; Schreiber, S. L. Chem. Biol. 2001, 8, 1167-1182. (d) See ref 19.
(18) For an analysis of site-site interactions, see: Hodge, P. Chem. Soc. ReV.
1997, 26, 417-424.
(21) Baker, R.; Castro, J. L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 47-65.
(22) Suzuki, Y.; Takahashi, H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1983, 31, 1751-1753.
(23) Torrini, I.; Zecchini, G. P.; Agrosi, F.; Paradisi, M. P. J. Heterocycl. Chem.
1986, 23, 1459-1463.
(24) For a discussion of the reactivity of hypervalent iodine reagents, see:
Varvoglis, A. HyperValent Iodine in Organic Synthesis; Elsevier: London,
1996.
(19) Tallarico, J. A.; Depew, K. M.; Pelish, H. E.; Westwood, N. J.; Lindsley,
C. W.; Shair, M. D.; Schreiber, S. L.; Foley, M. A. J. Comb. Chem. 2001,
3, 312-318.
1
(25) As judged by the crude H NMR of product 16, which was cleaved from
(20) Burke, M. D.; Schreiber, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 46-58.
the resin with HF‚pyridine.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 16, 2006 5393