3170
S. Pu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 3167–3171
the optoelectronic properties of diarylethenes was inves-
900
750
600
450
300
150
0
3b
3a
2b
1a
1b
2a
tigated for the first time. The results showed that the
optoelectronic performances of diarylethenes, including
molar absorption coefficient, photochromic quantum
yields, fluorescence intensity, and electrochemical prop-
erty, etc., were significantly dependent on the effect of
the substituent position. The oxidation potential differ-
ences of the open-ring and closed-ring forms of the
ortho-, meta-, and para-substituted diarylethene deriva-
tives were 0.03, 0.07, and 0.18 V, respectively. The rea-
son may be attributed to the different electro-
withdrawing effects when the fluorine atom was substi-
tuted on the different positions of the terminal phenyl
groups. The para-position of the terminal phenyl groups
of diarylethene on these performances is the most signif-
icant. The present results are useful for the designation
of efficient photoactive and excellent characteristic
diarylethene compounds.
1a
1b
2a
2b
3a
3b
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.8
2.1
Potential / V vs. Pt
Figure 4. The anodic polarization curves of diarylethene 1–3.
0.5 mm) served as working electrode and counter elec-
trode. Platinum wire served as a quasi-reference elec-
trode. It was calibrated using the ferrocene (Fc/Fc+)
Acknowledgments
redox couple, which has a formal potential E1/2
=
This work was supported by the Projects of National
Natural Science Foundation of China (Granted No.
20564001), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi,
China (Granted No. 050017) and the Science Funds of
the Education Office of Jiangxi, China (Granted No.
[2005] 140).
+0.35 V versus platinum wire. The typical electrolyte
was acetonitrile (5 mL) containing 0.15 mol/L LiClO4
and 4.0 · 10ꢀ3 mol/L dithienylethene. All solutions were
deaerated by a dry argon stream and maintained at a
slight argon overpressure during electrochemical experi-
ments. Figure 4 shows the anodic polarization curves of
1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, and 3b. We can see from Figure 4 that
ortho- and para-fluorine substituted diarylethenes (com-
pounds 1 and 2) showed similar electrochemical behav-
ior both in closed-ring and open-ring forms. The
oxidation potential onsets of 1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b initiated
at 1.14, 1.11, 1.22, and 1.15 V, respectively. In sharp
contrast to 1 and 2, the oxidation potentials of 3a and
3b decreased significantly to 0.97 and 0.79 V, respec-
tively. Moreover, the great difference of the open-ring
form and closed-ring form of compound 3 was observed
up to 0.18 V. Furthermore, the anodic current densities
of 3a and 3b were much higher than that of 1a, 1b and
2a, 2b at given applied potentials. On the other hand,
similar phenomenon was observed when the oxidation
potentials of 1a, 2a, and 3a are all higher that those of
1b, 2b, and 3b.
References and notes
1. (a) Du¨rr, H.; Bouas-Laurent, H. Photochromism: Mole-
cules and Systems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1990; (b) Brown,
G. H. Photochromism; Wiley-Interscience: New York,
1971.
2. Irie, M. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1685–1716.
3. Tian, H.; Yang, S. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 85–97.
4. Chen, Y.; Xie, N. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 3229–3232.
5. Li, X. C.; Tian, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 5409–5412.
6. Morimoto, M.; Irie, M. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3895–3905.
7. Pu, S. Z.; Yang, T. S.; Xu, J. K.; Shen, L.; Li, G. Z.; Xiao,
Q.; Chen, B. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6623–6629.
8. (a) Irie, M.; Sakemura, K.; Okinaka, M.; Uchida, K. J.
Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 8305–8309; (b) Uchida, K.; Mats-
uoka, T.; Kobatake, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Irie, M. Tetra-
hedron 2001, 57, 4559–4565.
9. Morimitsu, K.; Shibata, K.; Kobatake, S.; Irie, M. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 4574–4578.
10. Takami, S.; Irie, M. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 6155–6161.
11. Tanifuji, N.; Matsuda, K.; Irie, M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
3777–3780.
12. Yamamoto, S.; Matsuda, K.; Irie, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2003,
9, 4878–4886.
13. Ern, J.; Bens, A. T.; Martin, H.-D.; Mukamel, S.; Schmid,
D.; Tretiak, S.; Tsiper, E.; Kryschi, C. Chem. Phys. 1999,
246, 115–125.
14. Selected data for 1–3: compound 1a: mp = 106.3–
107.3 ꢁC; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 1.98 (s, 6H),
7.12–7.19 (m, 6H), 7.44 (s, 2H), 7.54–7.58 (m, 2H); 19F
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 110.05 (4F), 113.60 (2F),
113.78 (2F); MS m/z (M) 556; compound 2a: mp = 145.9–
146.8 ꢁC; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 1.97 (s, 6H),
6.98–7.02 (t, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.22 (s, 2H), 7.29 (s, 2H),
7.30–7.38 (m, 4H); 19F NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 110.00
(4F), 112.30 (2F), 131.77 (2F); MS m/z (M) 556;
These phenomena described above strongly suggested
that substituent position of fluorine atom at phenyl ring
had significant effect on the optoelectronic properties of
diarylethenes. The main reason for these may be as-
cribed to the electro-withdrawing nature of fluorine
atom at para-position of the terminal phenyl groups.
For meta-position substituent fluorine atom of diaryl-
ethene 2, the electro-withdrawing effect is not remark-
able. For ortho-position substituent fluorine atom of
diarylethene 1, the electro-withdrawing effect, together
with its steric effect plays a main role so that the com-
positive effect is similar to that of diarylethene 2.22
In conclusion, three diarylethenes bearing fluorine
atoms at the ortho-, meta-, and para-positions of both
terminal phenyl groups were synthesized. The effect of
different substitution positions of fluorine atoms on