Aldol-type chirons from asymmetric hydrogenations of trisubstituted alkenes

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/ol900308w

Catalyst control dominates in the asymmetric hydrogenations of largely unfunctionalized trisubstituted alkenes formed from lactic acid and glyceraldehyde, affording syn- and anfi-aldol products of the type shown above.

Full text of DOI:10.1021/ol900308w

ORGANIC
LETTERS
2009
Vol. 11, No. 10
2053-2056
Aldol-Type Chirons from Asymmetric
Hydrogenations of Trisubstituted
Alkenes
Jian Zhao and Kevin Burgess*
Texas A & M UniVersity, Chemistry Department, P.O. Box 30012,
College Station, Texas 77842
burgess@tamu.edu
Received February 12, 2009
ABSTRACT
Catalyst control dominates in the asymmetric hydrogenations of largely unfunctionalized trisubstituted alkenes formed from lactic acid and
glyceraldehyde, affording syn- and anti-aldol products of the type shown above.
Innumerable natural products synthesized over the past three
decades contain polypropionate-derived fragments.1 These
entities can be situated at chain termini or internally, and
many correspond to the generic chirons A and B, i.e.,
building blocks that can be elaborated in one or two
directions, respectively. The state-of-the-art approach for
preparation of chirons like these has shifted from diastereo-
selective aldol reactions involving chiral auxiliaries,2 to
catalytic enantioselective ones.3-6 However, the latter ap-
proach is challenging because both relative and absolute
stereochemistries of two new chiral centers need to be
controlled in a single, C-C bond-forming step.
(1) Schetter, B.; Mahrwald, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7506–
7525.
(2) Palomo, C.; Oiarbide, M.; Garcia, J. M. Chem.sEur. J. 2002, 8,
This paper describes an alternative to the strategy described
above. It involves stepwise introduction of stereocenters:
hydrogenation of chiral trisubstituted alkenes derived from
readily available chiral starting materials. This approach is
viable because excellent conversions and high levels of
catalyst-control are possible using chiral analogs of Crab-
36–44.
(3) Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 159, 5–1601
.
(4) Notz, W.; Tanaka, F.; Barbas, C. F., III. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37,
580–591
.
(5) Palomo, C.; Oiarbide, M.; Garcia, J. M. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2004, 33,
65–75
.
(6) Ngai, M.-Y.; Kong, J.-R.; Krische, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
1063–1072
.
10.1021/ol900308w CCC: $40.75
Published on Web 04/15/2009
 2009 American Chemical Society

Table 1. Hydrogenation of Lactic Acid Derivatives 4
substrates 4
entry
P
FG
CO2Et
1
H2 (bar)
syn/antia (crude material)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
a
b
c
H
R
S
R
S
R
S
R
S
50
50
5
5
5
5
20
20
1.0:2.0
61:1.0
1.0:10
27:1.0
1.0:10
16:1.0
1.0:1.2
14:1.0
MOM
MOM
MOM
CO2Et
CH2OH
d
CH2OTBDPS
a Reactions run to >99% conversion. Conversions and enantiomeric excesses determined via GC on a chiral column.
tree’s Ir-complexes7-12 like (S)-1.13,14 Stereoselective hy-
drogenations of chiral allylic alcohols were investigated
extensively about two decades ago.15- However, those
reactions were all substrate-controlled, so it was not possible
to obtain syn- and anti-aldol fragments by varying the catalyst
chirality. Here it was possible to do that; hence, some
important chirons were produced with high levels of catalyst
control using 0.5 mol % of complex 1; the syntheses are
practical and potentially scalable with minimal optimization.
Before the current studies began, we had already reported
moderate enantioselectivities for ethyl tiglate C and the
corresponding alcohol D; both these substrates have an
R-methyl group adjacent to the ester or hydroxymethylene
group.18 In the current work, we discovered that much better
enantioselectivities were obtained for substrates 2 and 3
where the methyl group is attached to the ꢀ-carbon of the
alkene (100% conversion at 0.5 mol% (S)-1, 25 °C, 6 h; 2,
5 bar H2; 3: 25 bar H2), as outlined below.
to optimize the diastereoselectivities in either direction, i.e.,
so that either the syn or the anti diastereomers could be
obtained. Pressure can influence enantioselectivities in
hydrogenations of some substrates with catalyst 1, but that
was not the case here; the main objective of varying it for
substrates 4 was to achieve >99% conversion within 12 h.
All of the data in Table 1 indicate hydrogenation of 4 is
catalyst controlled, but the substrate vector is also influential.
Excellent syn selectivities could be obtained, with entry 2
being best of those studied. After flash chromatography of
the material corresponding to entry 2, the syn/anti ratio was
>99:1.0 (75% yield). The best crude selectivity for the anti
isomer was 10:1.0 (entries 3 and 5); the material from the
experiment represented by entry 3 was purified by flash
chromatography giving 68% isolated yield of 1.0:31 syn/
anti material.17
An interesting difference emerges when comparing the
data for the “ꢀ-methyl” substrates in Table 1 (cf. Figure 1a)
with similar “R-methyl” alkenes. Relatively many com-
pounds of the latter type have been studied in our group,18-21
and two illustrative examples are given in Figure 1b. In all
cases of the later type, carbonyl derivatives (like the ester
shown) give opposite face selectivities relative to primary
alcohol and ether compounds. This has been explained in
terms of a catalyst vector (usually dominant) that involves
(12) Cheruku, P.; Diesen, J.; Andersson, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 5595–5599.
Substrates 4a-d were prepared to expand the scope of
the discovery outlined above in the context of preparing
chirons A (Table 1). Largely inconsequential changes were
made to the protecting group “P” and the functional group
(13) Perry, M. C.; Cui, X.; Powell, M. T.; Hou, D.-R.; Reibenspies,
J. H.; Burgess, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 113–123.
(14) Powell, M. T.; Hou, D.-R.; Perry, M. C.; Cui, X.; Burgess, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8878–8879.
(15) Brown, J. M.; Cutting, I. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985,
578–579.
(7) Crabtree, R. H.; Felkin, H.; Fillebeen-Khan, T.; Morris, G. E. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1979, 168, 183–198.
(16) Evans, D. A.; Morrissey, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 3866–
3868.
(8) Markert, C.; Roesel, P.; Pfaltz, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
3234–3235.
(17) Holscher, B.; Braun, N. A.; Weber, B.; Kappey, C.-H.; Meier, M.;
Pickenhagen, W. HelV. Chim. Acta 2004, 87, 1666–1680.
(18) Zhou, J.; Ogle, J. W.; Fan, Y.; Banphavichit, V.; Zhu, Y.; Burgess,
K. Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13, 7162–7170.
(9) Wang, A.; Wustenberg, B.; Pfaltz, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 2298–2300.
(10) Dieguez, M.; Mazuela, J.; Pamies, O.; Verendel, J. J.; Andersson,
P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7208–7209.
(11) Helmchen, G.; Pfaltz, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 336–345.
(19) Zhou, J.; Burgess, K. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1391–1393.
(20) Zhou, J.; Burgess, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1129–1131
.
(21) Zhu, Y.; Burgess, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8894–8895
.
2054
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 10, 2009

obtained from the E-alkene 5a (entry 1; 40:1.0 syn/anti and
84% yield after chromatography). Excellent anti-selectivity
was obtained from the same substrate simply by using the
enantiomeric catalyst (entry 2; 1.0:53 syn/anti and 78% yield
after chromatography), and even better control was achieved
via the Z-alkene (entry 3) and the allylic alcohol (entry 6).
DIBAL-H reduction of the products obtained from entries
1 and 2, benzylation (BnBr, NaH), and removal of the
acetonide (HOAc/H2O) gave chirons 6a and 6b. Glycitol
acetonide is available as both enantiomers, so the optical
antipodes of these chirons are also accessible via this route.
These chirons have been used in syntheses of pectenotox-
ins,22,23 azinothricins,24 and halichorine.25 Generally, they
have been made via opening of Sharpless’ epoxidation
products26 using trimethylaluminum. We believe the method
shown here is safer, greener, more scalable, and equally
practical; it should facilitate wider applications of these
materials.
Figure 1. Substrates with an R-methyl group respond differently
to the catalyst relative to those with a ꢀ-methyl group.
transient Ir coordination to the ester carbonyl in the catalytic
cycle, and a substrate vector dictated by 1,3-allylic strain
effects.18 The ꢀ-methyl of the alkenes in Table 1 may
disfavor Ir coordination to the ester, changing the catalyst
vector, while 1,2-strain effects govern the substrate one. The
net effect of all these issues is that the selectivity for the
ꢀ-methyl substrates is not affected by peripheral functional
groups in the same way that the R-methyl substrates are.
Optically pure glycitol acetonide was transformed into
substrates 5a-c for access to chirons B (Table 2). Again,
Looking forward, we are interested in developing hydro-
genations of trisubstituted alkenes to access stereochemical
triads and higher homologues based on aldol products.
Toward that end, Scheme 1 outlines how manipulation of
Table 2. Hydrogenation of Glycitol Derivatives 5
Scheme 1. Preparation of the anti,anti-Chiron 9
Roche ester derivatives can give substrates like 8 that can
then be hydrogenated with very high diastereoselectivities
to afford the valuable chiron 9.27
a Reactions run to >99% conversion. Conversions and enantiomeric
excesses determined via GC on a chiral column.
(22) Amano, S.; Fujiwara, K.; Murai, A. Synlett 1997, 1300–1302.
(23) Heapy, A. M.; Wagner, T. W.; Brimble, M. M. Synlett 2007, 2359–
2362.
elevated pressures were used in some cases to drive the
reactions to completion. All the transformations were catalyst
controlled except those shown in entries 3 and 4. 1,3-Allylic
strain considerations apparently accentuated the substrate
vector in the latter reactions. The best syn-selectivity was
(24) Hale, K. J.; Bhatia, G. S.; Peak, S. A.; Manaviazar, S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1993, 34, 5343–5346.
(25) Hurley, P. B.; Dake, G. R. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4131–4138.
(26) Gao, Y.; Hanson, R. M.; Klunder, J. M.; Ko, S. Y.; Masamune,
H.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5765–5780.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 10, 2009
2055

The hydrogenations described here have several attributes.
They are catalytic, high stereoselective, and afford chirons
that should be valuable for preparations of many polyketide-
derived natural products.
this work was provided by the National Science Founda-
tion (CHE-0750193) and the Robert A. Welch Foundation.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental pro-
cedures and characterization data for the new compounds
reported. This material is available free of charge via the
Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Acknowledgment. We acknowledge Dr. Jianguang Zhou
for some preliminary experiments. Financial support for
(27) Pilli, R. A.; Murta, M. M. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 338–342.
OL900308W
2056
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 10, 2009