quantum yield for the detecting of Hg2+ ions in a neutral
buffered water solution. Unfortunately, RMS-Hg2+ binding
strength, with a Ks value in the range of 104 M-1, is weak,
indicating that RMS is only effective at high Hg2+ ion
concentrations (in the present condition, Hg2+ ions could be
detected down to the micromolar range; clear emission spectra
shift was observed when Hg2+ ion concentration was down to
5 µM). Nonetheless, this work undoubtedly has paved the way
toward a highly sensitive ratiometric Hg2+ ion sensor molecule.
It is envisioned that sensor-Hg2+ binding strength will be
enhanced if the tetraamide receptor is incorporated into a “push-
pull” π-electron system, where the electron deficiency in the
electron-acceptor moiety, compared with that of RMS, is
reduced to some extent.
Experimental Section
FIGURE 6. Proposed RMS-Hg2+ complex structure and the energy-
minimized conformation by using Hyperchem software with the
molecular mechanics subroutine.17
RMS. 7 (150 mg) and 8 (90 mg, 0.408 mmol)16 were dissolved
in 15 mL of dry methanol containing five drops of piperidine. The
mixture was refluxed under nitrogen for 2.5 h. Then the solution
was cooled and concentrated under vacuum. The residue was
purified by flash chromatography using methanol-dichloromethane
(20:100, v/v) as eluant, affording 33 mg (0.046 mmol, 17%) of
RMS as a yellow solid. Mp: 195-197 °C; IR (KBr): 3368, 2937,
1655, 1615, 1549, 1056 cm-1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O): δ 7.44
(s, 1 H), 6.97 (s, 1H), 6.90 (d, J ) 6.9 Hz, 3 H), 6.79 (d, J ) 7.2
Hz, 1 H), 6.44 (t, J ) 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.36 (t, J ) 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.20
(s, 1 H), 4.20 (s, 4 H), 3.96 (s, 4 H), 3.62-3.66 (m, 8 H), 3.31-
3.35 (m, 8 H); 13C NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ 172.7, 172.6, 160.4,
150.9, 150.6, 149.2, 141.1, 139.0, 135.2, 126.5, 125.2, 122.9, 121.2,
113.9, 113.1, 107.1, 60.8, 55.9, 55.7, 42.3, 29.7, 14.2; HRMS (ES+)
Calcd for ([M + Na])+, 736.2377; Found, 736.2373.
get broadened. This could be attributed to a deshielding effect,
arising from the decrease of the electron density in the coumarin
fluorophore caused by N-Hg2+ (N, 6-, 7-nitrogen) complex-
ation, while the aliphatic protons, around the amide groups,
display only small downfield shifts. This could be attributed to
the shielding effect, arising from the negatively charged amide
groups (introduced by -N-Hg2+ complexation, -N-deprotonated
amide nitrogen), which, to some extent, counterbalances the
deshielding effect. In addition, ligand exchanges between the
four amide arms, on the NMR time scale, might occur since
1
only one set of aliphatic proton signals is observed. H NMR
spectra of the tetraamide receptor MR, in the presence of
different concentrations of Hg2+ ions, are also recorded (see
Supporting Information). Despite similar spectral shifting trends,
MR exhibits a higher Hg2+ ion binding strength15 since 2 equiv
of Hg2+ ions could almost bring about the maximum spectra
changes. This is reasonable in consideration of the presence of
two electron-deficient substituent groups in RMS, which
decreases the electron density on the 6-, 7-nitrogen and results
in a weaker N-Hg2+ binding strength.
CS was similarly prepared from RMS (94%) as a yellow solid.
Note: in this reaction, we used ethanol as the solvent instead of
methanol. Mp: 186-188 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.98
(s, 1 H), 8.06 (d, J ) 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.95 (d, J ) 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.51
(t, J ) 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.38-7.40 (overlapped, 2 H), 6.99 (s, 1H),
4.46 (s, 4 H), 4.24 (s, 4 H), 4.10-4.19 (m, 8 H), 1.21-1.26 (m, 12
H); 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.2, 170.1, 160.7, 160.3,
152.5, 151.5, 148.2, 141.5, 138.6, 136.6, 126.3, 125.1, 122.7, 121.9,
121.7, 117.3, 113.7, 108.0, 61.1, 60.9, 52.7, 29.7, 14.2; MS (ES+)
Calcd for ([M + H])+, 654; Found, 654.
Accordingly, on the basis of the evidence mentioned above,
Figure 6 presents a proposed Hg2+-RMS complexation struc-
ture, in which two deprotonated amide groups cooperate with
the two o-phenylenediamine nitrogen atoms to form a tetrahedral
ligand atmosphere for a Hg2+ ion. The other two unbound amide
arms may exert steric effects, which restrict the free rotation of
the amide arms and favor the Hg2+-RMS complexation.
In summary, we have developed a ratiometric ICT fluorescent
Hg2+ ion sensor RMS by incorporating an o-phenylenediamine-
derived tetraamide receptor into a coumarin platform. RMS has
several desirable sensor properties such as remarkable emission
wavelength shift, absolute selectivity, and almost constant
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National
Key Project for Basic Research (2003CB 114400) and the
National Natural Science Foundation of China. We thank the
reviewers for their smart and pertinent comments; some dis-
cussions originated from their comments.
Note Added after ASAP Publication. The emission intensity
ratio in Figure 3 was shown as 567 to 485 nm, instead of 475
nm, in the version published ASAP April 29, 2006; the corrected
version was published May 4, 2006.
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis and character-
ization of compounds 2-7, MR, NMR spectra, and spectrascopic
data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
(14) (a) Su, C.-Y.; Goforth, A. M.; Smith, M. D.; Loye, H.-C. Z. Inorg.
Chem. 2003, 42, 5685. (b) Li, G.; Song, Y.; Hou, H.; Li, L.; Fan, Y.; Zhu,
Y.; Meng, X.; Mi, L. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 913.
(15) The difference in the Hg2+ ion-binding stoichiometry also occurs
1
between MR and RMS. Job’s plot using H NMR data indicates that MR
JO052642G
binds Hg2+ ion with a 1:2 stoichiometry (see Supporting Information). While
it is difficult to determine the high association constant between MR and
the Hg2+ ion using NMR techniques, a photoinduced electron transfer (PET)
fluorescent sensor molecule, based on BODIPY (boron dipyrromethene)
fluorophore and the tetraamide receptor MR, shows that the association
constant of the 1:2 MR-Hg2+ complexation is larger than 1010 M-2. This
result will be published soon in a separate paper.
(16) Compound 8 was synthesized following the literature method.
Abbotto, A.; Bradamante, S.; Facchetti, A.; Pagani, G. A. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 5753.
(17) Detailed information on the calculation methods and results is
provided in Supporting Information.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 71, No. 11, 2006 4311