3769–3771; i) S. Csihony, D. A. Culkin, A. C. Sentman, A. P. Dove,
R. M. Waymouth, J. L. Hedrick, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9079–
9084; j) M. S. Kerr, J. Read deAlaniz, T. Rovis, J. Org. Chem. 2005,
70, 5725–5728.
[9] K-NACHTERUG(N SiMe3)2]2 (“ACHTRE(UNG K-HMDS)2”) is dimeric in the solid state: a) K. F.
Insertion Reactions
FULL PAPER
Tesh, T. P. Hanusa, J. C. Huffman, Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 1584–
1586; b) P. G. Williard, Acta. Crystallogr. Sect. C 1988, 44, 270–272;
c) in benzene solution: d) H. Buerger, H. Seyffert, Angew. Chem.
1964, 76, 646; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1964, 3, 577; and in
THF: e) M. A. Nichols, D. Waldmueller, P. G. Williard, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1153–1154.
[5] For leading references on the mechanisms of dimerisation of het-
ACHTREUNGeroatom stabilised carbenes see: a) H. W. Wanzlick, Angew. Chem.
1962, 74, 129–134; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1962, 1, 75–80;
b) D. M. Lemal, R. A. Lovald, K. I. Kawano, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1964, 86, 2518–2519; c) H. E. Winberg, J. E. Carnahan, D. D. Coff-
man, M. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 2055–2056; d) M. F.
Lappert, J. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 358, 185–214; e) Y.-T. Chen, F.
Jordan, J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5029–5038; f) E. C¸ etinkaya, P. B.
Hitchcock, H. A. Jasim, M. F. Lappert, K. Spyropoulos, J. Chem.
Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1992, 561–568; g) J. A. Chamizo, P. B. Hitch-
cock, H. A. Jasim, M. F. Lappert, J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 451,
89–96; h) B. C¸ etinkaya, P. B. Hitchcock, M. F. Lappert, D. B. Shaw,
K. Spyropoulos, N. J. W. Warhurst, J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 459,
311–317; i) E. C¸ etinkaya, P. B. Hitchcock, H. KüÅükbay, M. F. Lap-
pert, S. Al-Juaid, J. Organomet. Chem. 1994, 481, 89–95; j) G. V.
Tormos, M. G. Bakker, P. Wang, M. V. Lakshmikantham, M. P.
Cava, R. M. Metzger, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8528–8535;
k) T. A. Taton, P. Chen, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1098–1100;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1011–1013; l) Z. Shi, V.
Goulle, R. P. Thummel, Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2357–2360;
m) M. K. Denk, A. Thadani, K. Hatano, A. J. Lough, Angew. Chem.
1997, 109, 2719–2721; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2607–
2609; n) R. W. Alder, M. E. Blake, Chem. Commun. 1997, 1513–
1514; o) B. C¸ etinkaya, E. C¸ etinkaya, J. A. Chamizo, P. B. Hitchcock,
H. A. Jasim, H. KüÅükbay, M. F. Lappert, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin
Trans. 1 1998, 2047–2054; p) M. K. Denk, K. Hatano, M. Ma, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2057–2060; q) R. W. Alder, M. E. Blake, J.
Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 11200–11211; r) Y. Liu, P. E. Lindner,
D. M. Lemal, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10626–10627; s) F. E.
Hahn, L. Wittenbecher, R. Boese, D. Bläser, Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5,
1931–1935; t) F. E. Hahn, L. Wittenbecher, D. Le Van, R. Frçlich,
Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 551–554; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
541–544; u) R. W. Alder, L. Chaker, F. P. V. Paolini, Chem.
Commun. 2004, 2172–2173; v) Y. Gok, E. C¸ etinkaya, I. Ozdemir, B.
C¸ etinkaya, M. F. Lappert, Acta Chim. Slov. 2004, 51, 437–446;
w) F. E. Hahn, M. Paas, D. Le Van, R. Frçlich, Chem. Eur. J. 2005,
11, 5080–5085; x) D. C. Graham, K. J. Cavell, B. F. Yates, J. Phys.
Org. Chem. 2005, 18, 298–309; see also reference [1b].
[10] The separation of the supernatent toluene solution of 2/H-HMDS
from the precipitated KPF6 and any residual 1, by filtration (0.45 mm
PTFE filter), was found to have no effect on the chemistry descri-
bed herein, other than to effect trace <5% hydrolysis of 2 to gener-
ate 5, 6H and 7H.
[11] R. W. Alder, unpublished, but discussed in reference [5u].
[12] U. Wannagat, H. Niederprüim, Chem. Ber. 1961, 94, 1540–1547.
[13] Reaction of phenacetaldehyde with N-ethyl-N’-isopropyl-propane-
1,3-diamine gave 4 along with a mixture of other products, including
enamides and imines. Moreover, hydrolysis of a sample of [13C1]-4,
generated in greater quantity by reaction of [13C1]-1/K-HMDS/tol-
uene gave [13C1]-9 (dt at d=9.22 (1H) and 197.2 ppm (13C),
1J
ACHTRE(UNG C,H)=175 Hz). All attempts to prepare 4 by reaction of 1 with
PhCH2MgX, analogous to the preparation of aminals, as reported
by Perrin (C. L. Perrin, D. B. Young, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
4451–4458) were unsuccessful.
[14] The slight excess (in terms of HMDS anion) of (K-HMDS)2 over 2,
results in a slightly shallower gradient for ꢀd
ACHTRE[UNG K-HMDS]/c than for
d[2]/c (c=conversion in the reaction 1-PF6 +K-HMDS=2+KPF6).
[15] K-HMDS is predominantly or exclusively dimeric in toluene see ref-
erence [9] for leading references; however, the stoichiometry of the
reaction with [13C1]-1 is 1:1 based on HMDS anion.
[16] C. Hansch, A. Leo, R. W. Taft, Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165–195, and
references therein.
[17] The large excess of the toluene over carbene 2 means that the [D0]/
[D8]toluene ratio remains essentially constant throughout reaction.
Kinetic simulation, which takes the small changes in ratio into ac-
count, was also employed and gives the same values. The error in
the isotope effect determination caused by the change in [D0]/
[D8]toluene ratio is far outweighed by the error in determination of
the partitioning ratios ([D0]/[D8] products). The molarities of [D8]-
and [D0]toluene in the neat liquid state (9.43 and 9.40 and moldmꢀ3
,
respectively) are very similar—[D8]toluene is ca. 0.3% more con-
centrated.
[18] Based on the results from reaction of 2 with [D0]- and [D1]toluene
(Table 1, entries 9 and 14) the net KIE arises from a medium pri-
mary KIE (kH/kD ca. 4.2), which is augmented by large secondary
[6] The dimerisation of carbene 2 is catalysed by 1+ to give 3, and
occurs readily when reaction is conducted in THF - even with re-
verse addition of a solution of 1-PF6 to the base: R. W. Alder, G. C.
Lloyd-Jones, G. J. J. Owen-Smith, unpublished results.
ꢀ
ꢀ
KIEs (5CAr D: 1.62 (average 1.1 per CAr D) and 2a-D (=
1.182): net secondary kH/kD: 2.26), giving a net KIE of 2.264.2=
9.5. For leading references see: a) N. Isaacs in Physical Organic
Chemistry, 2nd. ed., Longman, Harlow, England, 1995, pp. 296–302;
b) E. V. Ansyln, D. A. Dougherty in Modern Physical Organic
Chemistry, University Science Books, Sausilito, California, USA,
2006, pp. 428–430; c) T. H. Lowry, K. Schueller Richardson in
Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed., Harper Col-
lins, New York, 1987, pp. 232–240.
[7] For publications reporting the discrete reaction of stable carbenes
ꢀ
with C H units, giving the product shown in Scheme 1, see: a) A. J.
Arduengo III, J. C. Calbrese, F. Davidson, H. V. R. Dias, J. R. Goer-
lich, R. Krafczyk, W. J. Marshall, M. Tamm, R. Schmutzler, Helv.
Chim. Acta. 1999, 82, 2348–2364; b) S. Sole, H. Gornitzka, W. W.
Schoeller, D. Bourissou, G. Bertrand, Science 2001, 292, 1901–1903;
c) N. I. Korotikh, G. F. Rayenko, O. P. Shvaika, T. M. Pekhtereva,
A. H. Cowley, J. N. Jones, C. L. B. Macdonald, J. Org. Chem. 1993,
58, 5762–5765; d) G. W. Nyce, S. Csihony, R. M. Waymouth, J. L.
Hedrick, Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 4073–4079.
[19] A dual toluene, six-membered-ring transition state mechanism
ꢀ
(analogous to that proposed for RO H insertion by carbenes, see:
J. R. Pliego, Jr., W. B. DeAlmeida, J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103,
3904–3909) is eliminated on this basis—which would anyway be
highly disfavoured on entropic grounds. The pseudo-second-order
rate constant for reaction of 2 with [D0]toluene (9.13m) in the pres-
[8] a) A. J. Arduengo III, H. V. R. Dias, R. L. Harlow, M. Kline, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5530–5534; b) A. J. Arduengo III, J. R. Goer-
lich, W. J. Marshall, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11027–11028;
c) W. A. Herrmann, C. Kçcher, L. J. Goossen, G. R. J. Artus, Chem.
Eur. J. 1996, 2, 1627–1636; d) R. W. Alder, P. R. Allen, M. Murray,
A. G. Orpen, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1211–1213; Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1121–1123; e) A. J. Arduengo III, J. R.
Goerlich, W. J. Marshall, Liebigs Ann. 1997, 365–374; f) R. W.
Alder, M. E. Blake, Chem. Commun. 1997, 1513–1514; g) R. W.
Alder, M. E. Blake, C. Bortolotti, S. Buffali, C. P. Butts, E. Lineham,
J. M. Oliva, A. G. Orpen, M. J. Quayle, Chem. Commun. 1999, 241–
242.
ence of 82 mm (K-HMDS)2 is predicted to be kobs =4.4
10ꢀ7 dm3 molꢀ1 sꢀ1
by extrapolation of
obs =xH(k(H)ꢀk(D))+k(D)
(Figure 4) to xH =1. This is in reasonable agreement with the value
of obs =3.3
(ꢁ0.1)10ꢀ7 dm3 molꢀ1 sꢀ1 for reaction of [D0]toluene
(2.81m) in [D6]benzene in the presence of 68 mm (K-HMDS)2.
A
,
k
k
ACHTREUNG
13
[20] The generation of approximately 3.8% of [2H7]
ACHTRE[UNG C1]-4, as the C(2)
ꢀ
H isotopomer, is consistent with the approximate 0.9% [D7]toluene
(CHD2 isotopomer) present in [D1]toluene (1H NMR analysis),
when one takes into account the predicted primary kH/kD =4.2
A
Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 5361 – 5375
ꢁ 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
5373