K. Sztanke et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 14 (2006) 3635–3642
3641
chloroform extracts yielded a solid, which was heated
under reflux with methanol (40 mL) for 1 h. The excess
solvent was removed by evaporation and upon cooling
the precipitate was collected, washed 2· 20 mL cold
propan-2-ol and finally recrystallized from methanol.
ganisms was determined visually after incubation for
24 h at 37 ꢁC. The lowest concentration at which there
was no visible growth (turbidity) was taken as the MIC.
The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values
were studied for reference bacterial strains: S. aureus
ATCC 25923 and E. coli ATCC 25922 towards eight
compounds determined in the disc-diffusion assay.
Ampicillin and chloramphenicol were used as standard
drugs for comparison in the antibacterial studies. Con-
trol experiments using dimethylsulfoxide were done for
antibacterial activity studies. The presented results were
obtained from three independent measurements. The
MIC values (in micromolars) are given in Table 3. The
investigations were carried out in the Department of
Medical Microbiology, Medical University, Lublin.
6.2. Microbiology
6.2.1. Disc diffusion assay. Assay of antimicrobial activity
in vitro. The synthesized compounds were tested for their
antimicrobial (antibacterial and antifungal) activities by
disc-diffusion method by Kirby–Bauer, using Mueller–
Hinton medium for bacteria and the same medium with
4% glucose for fungi. The majority of tested microorgan-
isms were isolated from clinical specimens of the Labora-
tory of Medical Microbiology Department, Medical
University of Lublin. The assayed collection included
the following microorganisms: S. epidermidis, S. pyoge-
nes, S. agalactiae (Gram-positive bacteria), P. aeruginosa,
P. vulgaris, K. pneumoniae, E. aerogenes (Gram-negative
bacteria), C. albicans and Aspergillus spp. Besides, two
reference strains of bacteria—S. aureus ATCC 25923
and E. coli ATCC 25922 were included in these studies.
References and notes
ˇ
1. Waisser, K.; Hladuvkova, J.; Hrabalek, A.; Klimeso-
va, V.; Kubicova, L.; Kunes, J.; Machacek, M.;
ˇ
ˇ
ˇ
Palat, K.; Sova J.; Vinsova J.; Buchta V.; Jilek, P.;
Odlerova, Z. Postepy nauk farmaceutycznych, Ed.;
Warszawa, 1996.
2. Organisch-Chemische Arzneimittel und ihre Synonyma;
Negwer, M., Ed.; Akademie-Verlag: Berlin, 1987.
In the disc-diffusion method, sterile paper discs
(B 5 mm) impregnated with compound dissolved in
dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) at concentrations of 100
and 200 lg mLꢀ1 were used. Discs containing DMSO
were used as control. The microorganism cultures were
spread over the following appropriate media: Mueller–
Hinton agar for S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. pyogenes,
S. agalactiae, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, P. vulgaris, K. pneu-
moniae, E. aerogenes and Sabouraud’s agar for the
yeast-like fungi (C. albicans) and for the moulds (Asper-
gillus spp.) in Petri dishes. Then, the paper discs impreg-
nated with the solutions of the compound tested were
placed on the surface of the media inoculated with the
microorganism. The plates were incubated at 35 ꢁC/
24 h for the microorganism cultures. After incubation,
the growth inhibition zones around the discs were ob-
served, indicating that the examined compound inhibits
the growth of microorganism.25–27 Each assay in this
experiment was repeated three times. Ampicillin in a
concentration of 200 lg mLꢀ1 (572.4 lM) was used as
a standard drug. Dimethylsulfoxide was used as solvent
control. Results were interpreted in terms of the diame-
ter of the inhibition zone and are shown in Table 2.
ˇ
3. Waisser, K.; Klimesova, V.; Odlerova, Z. Folia Pharm.
Univ. Carol. 1995, 18, 27, 31.
ˇ
ˇ
ˇ
4. Klimesova, V.; Otcenasek, M.; Waisser, K. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 1996, 31, 389.
ˇ
ˇ
5. Klimesova, V.; Svoboda, M.; Waisser, K.; Machacek, M.;
Buchta, V.; Odlerova, Z. Arch. Pharm. Med. Chem. 1996,
329, 438.
ˇ
6. Klimesova, V.; Svoboda, M.; Waisser, K.; Pour, M.;
Kaustova, J. Il Farmaco 1999, 54, 666.
ˇ
7. Waisser, K.; Klimesova, V.; Buchta, V. Folia Pharm. Univ.
Carol. 1996, 20, 53.
ˇ
8. Waisser, K.; Klimesova, V.; Odlerova, Z. Folia Pharm.
Univ. Carol. 1996, 20, 59.
9. Donkor, I. O.; Clark, A. M. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 34,
639.
´
´
10. Szymanska, E.; Kiec-Kononowicz, K. Il Farmaco 2002,
57, 355.
11. Matysiak, J.; Niewiadomy, A.; Krajewska-Kułak, E.;
Ma˛cik-Niewiadomy, G. Farmaco 2003, 58, 455.
´
´
12. Sztanke, K.; Sidor-Wojtowicz, A.; Truchlinska, J.; Pas-
ternak, K.; Sztanke, M. Ann. UMCS, Sect. D 2004, 59,
100.
13. Singh, H.; Shukla, K. N.; Dwivedi, R.; Yadav, L. D. S.
Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 1990, 52, 9.
6.2.2. Microdilution assays. The minimal inhibitory con-
centration (MIC) values for all compounds tested, de-
fined as the lowest concentration of the compound
preventing the visible growth, were determined by using
the microdilution broth method according to NCCLS
standards.26 The inocula of microorganisms were pre-
pared from 24 h broth cultures and suspensions were
adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard turbidity. The test
compounds dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
were first diluted to the highest concentration
(500 lg mLꢀ1) to be tested. Then serial twofold dilutions
were made in concentration ranges from 1.95 to
500 lg mLꢀ1 in 10 mL sterile tubes. A prepared suspen-
sion of the standard microorganisms was added to each
dilution in a 1:1 ratio. Growth (or its lack) of microor-
14. Ikizler, A. A.; Uc¸ar, F.; Demirbas, N.; Yasa, I.; Ikizler, A.;
Genzer, T. Indian J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1999, 61, 271.
15. Yuksek, H.; Denirbas, A.; Ikizler, A.; Johansson, C. B.;
¨
C¸ elik, C.; Ikizler, A. A. Arzneim.-Forsch. Drug Res. 1997,
47, 405.
16. Ersan, S.; Nacak, S.; Berkem, R. Il Farmaco 1998, 53,
773.
17. Holla, B. S.; Gonsalves, R.; Shennoy, S. Il Farmaco 1998,
53, 574.
18. Sztanke, K.; Fidecka, S.; Kedzierska, E.; Karczmarzyk, Z.;
Pihlaja, K.; Matosiuk, D. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 40, 127.
19. Lehmann, D.; Faust, G. DD Patent 155 6141, 1982; Chem.
Abstr. 1983, 98, 125599 g.
20. Knoevenagel, E.; Mercklin, E. Ber. 1904, 37, 4089.
21. Takeda, A. J. Org. Chem. 1957, 22, 1096 (and other
references there).