Scheme 1
Figure 2. Structures of side products formed on tri(n-butyl)tin
hydride-AIBN reduction of the imidazolylthionocarbonyl deriva-
tive 10.
tive 11 (Figure 2) were formed along with an unstable tin-
containing derivative to which structure 12 was assigned (by
1H NMR) and the alcohol 9. Fragmentation of hemiacetal
12 provides a likely mechanism for reversion from 10 to
the starting alcohol 9. When the thionocarbamate 10 in
toluene containing AIBN was added to neat Bu3SnH at 120
°C, methoxy derivative 11 was obtained in 77% yield.
Reduction of 10 in dilute solutions but at a lower temperature
(80 °C) also gave considerable amounts of 11 and 12. These
results corroborate some earlier reported observations on tri-
n-butyltin hydride reduction of xanthate esters.15
atom delivery from the R-side in allylic alcohols related to
6 via “chirality transfer”. All of these methods lead to olefins
5 which have a lack of regiocontrolling factors for further
functionalization. Direct conjugate reduction of ketones 3
with DIBAL-cuprous iodide provides a short-step approach
to functionalized trans-hydrindane derivatives,9 but the fragile
nature of the intermediate copper hydride species may
obstruct large-scale preparations. More circumvent ap-
proaches to 2 starting from 3 or 4 have also been developed.10
We wish now to present a facile and operationally simple
method for transforming 4 into 2 via alcohol 6, epoxide 7,
and diol 8.
Although the overall yield of 2 compared rather well with
those attainable by other methods, other approaches to
selective removal of the C-5 hydroxyl group in diol 8 were
examined.
Allylic alcohol 6 was treated with m-CPBA to give
â-epoxide 7 quantitatively. Reduction of the epoxide 7 with
sodium cyanoborohydride-BF3‚Et2O in THF according to
the Hutchins protocol11 afforded diol 8 in 77% yield. Use
of Et2O12 as the solvent led to an increase of the product
yield to 86%.13 Diol 8 was transformed quantitatively into
the diacetate which by controlled hydrolysis and chroma-
tography afforded monoacetate 9 in 70% yield along with
unchanged diacetate (7%), isomeric monoacetate (7%), and
diol 8 (16%). The hydrolysis step was not optimalized
extensively since all side products could be easily recycled.
The monohydroxy derivative 9 was esterified with thiono-
carbonyl-1,1′-diimidazole (TCDI) in THF at reflux, and the
thionocarbonate 10 was reduced with tri(n-butyl)tin hydride-
2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropanenitrile) (AIBN).14 Chromatog-
raphy then gave the known4 derivative 2. The best yields of
2 (80% in two steps) were obtained when a solution of 10
containing AIBN (ca. 20 mol %) was added slowly with a
syringe pump to a dilute solution of Bu3SnH (4 molar equiv)
in toluene at reflux. At higher concentrations of tri(n-
butyltin)hydride substantial amounts of the methoxy deriva-
Figure 3. Structures of monotosylate 13 and of the product
obtained on its reduction with LiAlH4.
Monotosylate 13 (Figure 3) was obtained almost quanti-
tatively by treating 8 with 1.5 molar equiv of tosyl chloride
in pyridine. Upon reduction of tosylate 13 with LiAlH4 in
THF rearranged primary alcohol 14 was obtained. Anti-
periplanar disposition of the C-3a-C-4 bond and the tosyloxy
C-O bond explains the rearrangement (Figure 3, 13a).
Diol 8 when treated with TCDI produced cyclic thiono-
carbonate 15 (Scheme 2) quantitatively. Reduction of 15 with
tri-n-butyltin hydride-AIBN provided a complex mixture
of products. Gratifyingly, treatment of 15 with methyl
iodide16 at 40 °C (sealed ampule) provided crystalline and
stable iodohydrine derivative 16 (81% yield after chroma-
tography). The structure of 16 was confirmed by narrow
multiplets corresponding to equatorial protons at C-4 (δ 5.33
(8) Corey, E. J.; Virgil, S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6429-6431.
Myers, A. G.; Zheng, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4841-4844.
(9) (a) Daniewski, A. R.; Kiegiel, J. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 5534-
5535. (b) Daniewski, A. R.; Liu, W. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 626-628.
(10) For a review, see: Jankowski, P.; Marczak, S.; Wicha, J. Tetrahe-
dron 1998, 54, 12071-12150.
(11) Hutchins, R. O.; Taffer, I. M.; Burgoyne, W. J. Org. Chem. 1981,
46, 5214-5215.
(12) Leyes, A. E.; Poulter, C. D. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1067-1070.
(13) In THF, partial gelling of the solvent occurred that complicated the
isolation procedure, especially on larger scale runs.
1
ppm) and C-5 (δ 4.63 ppm). An H NMR spectrum of the
(15) Robins, M. J.; Wilson, J. S.; Hansske, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983,
105, 4059-4065.
(16) (a) Vedejs, E.; Wu, E. S. C. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3641-3645.
(b) Barton, D. H. R.; Stick, R. V. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1975,
1773-1776.
(14) Barton, D. H. R.; McCombie, S. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1975, 1574-1585.
2552
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 12, 2006