H. Jin et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 472 (2014) 184–190
185
Vosko–Wilk–Nusair (VWN) functional implemented in the DMOL3
software package Material Studio 6.0 from Accelrys.
tions.
Mesoporous zeolites containing both crystalline micropores
attention in various alkylation reactions [24–31], which exhib-
ited enhanced catalytic activity and remarkable change of product
selectivity due to improved accessibility to and/or from active
reported the novel method for synthesis of mesoporous ZSM-
5 by microwave induced assembly via electrostatic interaction
between anionic sulfonic acid functionalized ZSM-5 nanoparti-
cles and counter cationic surfactant (Cetyltrimethylammonium
bromide: CTAB) [37]. This mesoporous ZSM-5 showed not only
remarkably improved catalytic activity in aromatic benzylation
but also much higher selectivity of desired monobenzylated
aromatic compared with microporous ZSM-5, which was due
to enhanced intracrystalline mesoporosity and external acid
sites. Moreover, the selectivity of desired monobenzylated aro-
matic increased with increase in mesoporosity was observed
[38].
2.3. Catalytic tests
All the experiments were carried out in a 25 ml single-necked
flask equipped with reflux condenser. The mole ratio of phenol,
p-cresol, and guaiacol with cyclohexene was 5:1. In a typical reac-
tion, 1 ml solution containing 9.41 mmol of phenol and 1.88 mmol
of cyclohexene were placed into the reactor. The 0.05 g/ml of cata-
lyst was loaded with respect to total volume of the reaction mixture.
The reaction was carried out at 80 ◦C for 4 h. Small amounts of clear
liquid reaction mixture was analyzed by using a gas chromatograph
(Agilent Technologies, GC 6890 N) equipped with a flame ionization
detector (FID) and a capillary column (HP 5% silicone gum, 0.25
micron i.d. with 30 m long). The products were also confirmed by
GC–MS (Agilent Technologies GC 6890 N, and MS5975).
3. Results and discussion
In continuation to our earlier studies on aforementioned zeolitic
catalyst, in the current study, we investigated the effect of meso-
porosity and external acid sites on the catalytic activity and
selectivity of O- and C-alkylated products in the chemoselective
alkylation of phenol with cyclohexene as an alkylating agent over
ZSM-5 catalysts with different degree of mesoporosity such as Meso
ZSM-5 (SO3H-CTAB)-MW, Meso ZSM-5 (CTAB)-MW (mesoporous
ZSM-5 were synthesized by assembly via electrostatic interac-
tion between sulfonic functionalized or non-functionalized ZSM-5
nanozeolites and counter cationic surfactant under microwave),
ZSM-5 (SO3H-CTAB)-HT, and ZSM-5 (HT) (hydrothermal synthe-
sis with or without sulfonic acid functionalization and surfactant).
Moreover, the effects of mole ratio of phenol to cyclohexene, reac-
tion temperature and time, catalyst loading, substituent on phenol,
and recyclability have also been investigated.
3.1. Porosity and acidity of catalyst
All the obtained ZSM-5 catalysts such as Meso ZSM-5 (SO3H-
CTAB)-MW, Meso ZSM-5 (CTAB)-MW, ZSM-5 (SO3H-CTAB)-HT, and
ZSM-5 (HT) showed typical crystalline structure of MFI in wide-
angle XRD patterns. In low-angle XRD patterns, The meso ZSM-5
(SO3H-CTAB)-MW exhibited remarkably higher intensity of the
diffraction peak at 2Â = 1–3◦ which was an evidence for the pres-
ence of mesopore arrays compared with meso ZSM-5 (CTAB)-MW.
Whereas there was no distinct peak observed in case of ZSM-5
(SO3H-CTAB)-HT which was similar to microporous ZSM-5 (HT)
[38]. These results coincided with the N2 adsorption–desorption
isotherms and physical properties which are summarized in Table
S1. The three types of pores such as micropores (<2 nm), uni-
pore size distribution of meso ZSM-5 (SO3H-CTAB)-MW [37,38].
The forced closure at relative pressure of 0.45 was due to ten-
sile strength effect which was in consonance with earlier reports
[39–41]. The BET surface area, external surface area, and mesopore
volume of meso ZSM-5 (SO3H-CTAB)-MW were 529, 400 m2/g and
0.75 cm3/g, respectively, which were much higher than those of
other catalysts due to enhanced mesoporosity.
The number of strong acid sites and external acid sites
were measured by NH3 TPD and chemisorptions of 2,6-di-tert-
butylpyridine, respectively as shown in Table S1. The strong acid
sites of meso ZSM-5 (SO3H-CTAB)-MW (0.32 mmol/g) were only 8%
less than the ZSM-5 (HT) (0.46 mmol/g). This was approximately
similar which indicated that the meso ZSM-5 (SO3H-CTAB)-MW
was prepared without significantly sacrificing acidity [42]. More-
over, the external acid sites increased with the increasing of
mesoporosity were confirmed.
2. Experiment
2.1. Chemicals and catalysts
Phenol, p-cresol, guaiacol, cyclohexene, tetraethyl orthosilicate
(TEOS, 98%), and aluminum isopropoxide (AIP) were purchased
from Sigma–Aldrich Co. Ltd. Tetrapropylammonium hydroxide
(TPAOH, 20 ∼ 25%), 3-mercaptopropyltriethoxysliane (MPTES) and
cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) were obtained from
Tokyo Chemical Industry CO. Ltd. (TCI). Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2,
The ZSM-5 catalysts with different degree of mesoporosity such
as Meso ZSM-5 (SO3H-CTAB)-MW, Meso ZSM-5 (CTAB)-MW, ZSM-
5 (SO3H-CTAB)-HT, and ZSM-5 (HT) were prepared according to
established procedures reported in Ref. [37]. Prior to reaction all
the catalysts were pretreated at 450 ◦C for 2 h.
2.2. Catalysts characterization
3.2. Chemoselective alkylation of substituted phenols with
cyclohexene
All the catalysts were characterized by powder X-ray diffrac-
tion (XRD), N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms (BET surface
pore volume), temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) of NH3,
chemisorption of 2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine, and the details were
published recently by our group [38]. Molecular size of products in
Scheme 2A was estimated by geometry optimizations which were
calculated using the local density approximation (LDA) with the
Chemoselective alkylation of phenol, p-cresol, and gua-
iacol with cyclohexene are presented in Scheme 1. These
4-methylbenzene,
and
1-cyclohexyloxy-2-methylbenzene;
the C-alkylated products are O- and p-cyclohexylphenol, 2-
cyclohexyl-p-cresol and o- and m- and p-cyclohexyl guaiacol,
respectively [14,19,20]. Moreover, several parallel reactions can be
occurred such as cyclohexene oligomerization (to form cyclohexyl