us to obtain X-ray quality crystals. The X-ray structure of
19 reveals the assignment for the major isomer of 16 to be
S for the new stereocenter. The absolute stereochemistry of
cycloadducts 13-15, 17, and 23-29 were assigned by
comparison to 16.
Other examples of such a stereoselective approach to
pericyclic ring closure of 1-azatrienes are shown in Table
2.18 It was found that the best stereoselectivity was obtained
Similarly, annulations of amides 20-22 with the iminium
salt derived from enal 11 proceeded in a rather stereorandom
manner (entries 3, 5, and 7).
While these ratios are modest, it provides an opportunity
to examine this ring closure more closely from a mechanistic
perspective. It is not obvious that one should expect any
diastereomeric induction during the ring-closure step of the
aza-[3 + 3] annulation given the high degree of conforma-
tional freedom of the chirality at the C-terminus of these
1-azatrienes. Toward this end, we proposed a model based
on a potential rotational preference to rationalize observed
torquoselectivity.
Table 2. Variations in the Amides
As shown in Scheme 3, there are two predominant con-
formations, 30A and 30B, with both minimizing allyl strains
Scheme 3
by placing the largest RL group at the allylic position in the
plane of the C-terminus vinyl strand. While both can undergo
ring-closure, simple molecular modeling reveals that 1-aza-
triene 30A could have an advantage over 30B given the
remote steric interaction (in green) between the N-Bn group
and the C-terminus allylic substituent. With 1-azatriene 30A
as the preferred conformation, a disrotatory ring closure in
the direction a (in red) should be favored to give the observed
major isomer because the direction b (in blue) would bring
the RL group (dotted arrow in blue) into closer contact with
the N-Bn group.
a The iminium salt was generated using 1 equiv of piperidine and 1 equiv
of Ac2O at 85 °C for 1 h. b The iminium salt was generated using 1 equiv
of piperidine trifluoroacetate salt at 85 °C for 1 h. c All reactions were carried
out in EtOAc/toluene (2:3) in a sealed tube for 24-72 h. d Isolated yields
only. e Ratios determined by 1H NMR. f The two diastereomers are insepa-
rable.
With this model in mind, we should note that 6π-electron
electrocyclic ring-closure can be reversible,19,20 especially
at high temperatures, leading to ratios reflecting thermody-
namic stabilities of the two diastereomeric isomers. We did
from the reactions of the iminium salt derived from enal 10,
which gave dihydropyridines 24, 26, and 28 with ratios of
77:23, 69:31, and 83:17, respectively (entries 2, 4, and 6).
(10) For a review on rotational preferences leading to diastereomeric
induction during a 6π-electron electrocyclic ring closure, see: Okamura,
W. H.; de Lera, A. R. ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Fleming, I., Eds.; Paquette, L. A., Vol. Ed.; Pergamon Press: New York,
1991; Vol. 5, pp 699-750.
(11) For some examples of torquoselective processes, see: (a) Harmata,
M.; Lee, D. R.; Barnes, C. L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1881. (b) Harmata, M.;
Schreiner, P. R.; Lee, D. R.; Kirchhoefer, P. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 10954. (c) Murakami, M.; Hasegawa, M.; Igawa, H. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 587. (d) Murakami, M.; Miyamoto, Y.; Ito, Y. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 189. (e) Murakami, M.; Miyamoto, Y.; Ito, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6441. (f) Giese, S.; Kastrup, L.; Stiens, D.; West, F.
G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2000, 39, 1970.
(12) (a) Earle, M. J.; Abdur-Rashid, A.; Priestley, N. J. Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 5697. (b) Brown, J. M.; Leppard, S. J.; Oakes, J.; Thornthwaite, D.
Chirality 2000, 12, 496.
(13) (a) Campbell, A. D.; Raynham, T. M., Taylor, R. J. K Synthesis
1998, 12, 1707. (b) Zhang, X.; Ni, W.; van der Donk, W. A. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 6685.
(14) Gonzales, F.; Lesage, S.; Perlin, A. S. Carbohydr. Res. 1975, 42,
267.
(15) Castaldi, G.; Cavicchioli, S.; Giordano, C.; Uggeri, F. J. Org. Chem.
1987, 52, 3018.
(16) See the Supporting Information.
(17) For a study employing enal 10 in oxa-[3 + 3] annulations with
4-hydroxy-2-pyrones, see: Sagar, R.; Singh, P.; Kumar, R.; Maulik, P. R.;
Shaw, A. K. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 1287.
(18) Despite our efforts, we were not able to render the reaction of 7 to
proceed feasibly with either aminopyrone 21 or amide 22.
(19) For a review on rotational preferences leading to diastereomeric
induction during a 6π-electron electrocyclic ring closure, see: Okamura,
W. H.; de Lera, A. R. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Fleming, I., Eds.; Paquette, L. A., Vol. Ed.; Pergamon Press: New York,
1991; Vol. 5, pp 699-750.
(20) For a recent computational study, see: Cabaleiro-Lago, E. M.;
Rodr´ıguez-Otero, J.; Santiago M. Varela-Varela, S. M.; Pena˜-Gallego, A.;
Hermida-Ramon, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3921.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 12, 2006
2613