J. A. Maier et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 3646–3650
3649
(BBr3, CH2Cl2, ꢀ78 ꢁC to rt) gave 5-hydroxy-2-methyl
derivative 10b which showed excellent activity in the
kinase assay. The substitution of the pyrimidyl 4-(2-
PK studies (Table 5). All compounds were tested for
inhibition of IL-2 production in a Jurkat cellular as-
say.10 Morpholinyl and piperazinyl analogs 7c and 7g
showed fair to good IL-2 inhibitory activity (2.90 and
0.749 lM). However, both of these compounds showed
poor aqueous solubility contributing to the reported
poor bioavailability for 7c. When the 4-(2-diethylamino-
ethoxy)-aniline was used (7i and 7j), the resulting com-
pounds again showed good to fair IL-2 activity, but
both compounds showed significantly improved aque-
ous solubility and good in vitro metabolism. Additional-
ly, 7i proved to be well absorbed orally in a rat PK study
(F% = 66%). The highly potent lck inhibitor 10b showed
equally strong potency in the IL-2 assay. The compound
also possessed good aqueous solubility. However,
metabolism studies showed a high intrinsic clearance
(CLint = 108 mL/min/kg)11 resulting in very poor oral
bioavailability. We then transitioned to the equally po-
tent amides 16a and 18c, which showed even greater rel-
ative inhibition of IL-2 production, but low solubility
prohibited further progression of these compounds into
PK studies.
diethylamino)-ethoxyaniline with
aniline (10c) did not result in any reduction in activity.
a
4-morpholinyl
Based on the success of the N0-5-hydroxy phenyl analogs
10b and 10c, we decided to extend the substitution at the
5-position of the N0-phenyl group to include amide func-
tionality. Scheme 2 shows the synthesis of amides 16 and
18. Starting with anilines 119 or 12, formation of the cor-
responding isocyanates was effected by heating the
hydrochloride salts of the amides in the presence of
phosgene in a sealed tube to give 13 and 14. The Boc-
protected ureas 15 and 17 were formed using standard
conditions (see Scheme 1). Deprotection of the Boc
group in 15 gave the desired amide urea 16. Nitro analog
17 was reduced (H2, Pd/C) and the resulting aniline acyl-
ated and Boc-deprotected to give the reverse amide 18.
Table 4 shows the results of kinase inhibition experi-
ments for five of these analogs. Activities in the
3–149 nM range were observed for the various deriva-
tives, indicating that even larger, more extended ureas
were well tolerated in the assay. Perhaps most interest-
ing was the 10-fold difference in potency between the
two amide isomers 16b and 18c.
Urea 7i was progressed further into an in vivo rat adju-
vant-induced arthritis study to test for oral efficacy. We
observed that 7i significantly (p < 0.01) inhibited hind
paw swelling when administered orally twice daily at
25 mg/kg for 7 days by 63% compared to vehicle-treated
control animals.14
Compounds from above that showed promising lck
inhibition were progressed into further in vitro and
In summary, we have reported a class of trisubstituted
ureas that have shown nanomolar activity for inhibiting
lck kinase activity. Six of the most potent analogs were
further tested for inhibition of IL-2 cytokine production,
showing a wide range of potencies. The urea analog that
showed the best profile from an in vitro activity and
pharmacokinetic stand point was tested for in vivo effi-
cacy. Urea 7i showed significant reduction in hind paw
swelling when tested in a rat adjuvant-induced arthritis
study. Therefore, this class of lck inhibitors shows prom-
ise as an orally bioavailable treatment for inflammatory
disorders.
a
b
H2N
R
OCN
R
13 R = C(O)NHR2
14 R = NO2
11 R = C(O)NHR2
12 R = NO2
O
N
N
HN
N
R3
N
N
HN
R
d, e, c
H
HN
Ar
N
O
R1N
Ar
N
O
15 R = C(O)NHR2, R1 = Boc
16 R = C(O)NHR2, R1 = H
17 R = NO2
c
18
Acknowledgments
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i)—1 M HCl, Et2O; (ii)—
phosgene, toluene, 100 ꢁC; (b) 4,6-diaminopyrimidine, CH2Cl2; (c)
TFA, CH2Cl2; (d) 17, H2, Pd/C, MeOH; (e) NaOH (aq), CH2Cl2,
R3C(O)Cl.
We thank M. M. Belkin for solubility and formulation
studies, J. A. Troutman, C. A. Cruze, and W. P.
Schwecke for metabolism and PK studies, C. M. Dun-
away, M. Martin, and P. H. Zoutendam for analytical
chemistry support, and J. T. Roesgen for kinase assay
support.
Table 5. IL-2 inhibition and pharmacokinetic data for select ureas
a
Compound IL-2 IC50 Solubility CLint
b
Cmax
F
(lM)
(lg/mL) (mL/min/kg) (ng/mL) (%)
7c
7g
2.90
0.749
0.862
3.10
3
2
48
—
9
—
394
—
3
0
—
66
—
1
References and notes
7i
38
34
41
1
40
25
1. Shaw, A. S.; Amrein, K. E.; Hammond, C.; Stern, D. F.;
Sefton, B. M.; Rose, J. K. Cell 1989, 59, 627.
2. Rudd, C. E.; Treyillyan, J. M.; Dasgupta, J. D.; Wong, L.
L.; Schlossman, S. F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1988,
85, 5190.
3. Duplay, P.; Thome, M.; Herve, F.; Acuto, O. J. Exp. Med.
1994, 179, 1163.
4. Weiss, A.; Littman, D. Cell 1994, 76, 263.
7j
10b
16a
18c
0.064
<0.010
<0.010
108
—
—
—
—
—
3
—
a IL-2 synthesis inhibition measured from Jurkat cells.
b Intrinsic clearance after 1 h for compounds (1 lM concentration)
tested in cryopreserved rat hepatocyte suspensions.