560
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 60, No. 3, March, 2011
Moiseev et al.
wise, and the reaction mixture was stirred at –5—0 °C for 1 h.
Then the mixture was poured into the mixture of ice and 25%
aqueous ammonia, stirred for 5 min, the products were extracted
with diethyl ether (200 mL) with vigorous stirring for 30 min.
The organic layer was separated, washed with water (2×100 mL),
dried with Na2SO4, and the solvent was removed in vacuo to give
compound 8 (2.25 g, purity ~95% according to the 1H NMR
data), foam, which crystallized at standing. The product can be
used on the next steps without further purification. Analytically
pure compound 8 was obtained by recrystallization from hepꢀ
tane—ethyl acetate (5 : 1), physicochemical characteristics and
NMR 1H spectra are identical to those given in literature.6
the ketal hydrolysis, in the acidic media, compound 6a
gives the C(6)ꢀcarbocation 9a, which is prone to reꢀ
arrangement into the C(8)ꢀcarbocation 9b additionally staꢀ
bilized by 8ꢀ[(1E)ꢀ2ꢀphenylethenyl] moiety. In this case,
formation of a mixture of two products is the result of the
competitive processes of the nucleophilic attack of water
on cation 9a to give 6b and the stabilization of cation 9b by
elimination of the proton from the position C(14) to give
2b (Scheme 1). Possible attack of a water molecule on
cation 9a can be disregarded since it resulted in epimeric
C(8) alcohols, which are, for the obvious reasons, in equiꢀ
librium with carbocation 9b under acidic conditions of
hydrolysis. In the case of ketal 6c, which contains no subꢀ
stituent capable of addition stabilizing the carbocationic
center at the C(8) atom, the formation of C(8)ꢀcation
analogous to 9b is less favorable as compared with the
corresponding C(6)ꢀcation making the preparation of theꢀ
baine (2a) in preparative yields impossible.
References
1. A. F. Casy, R. T. Parfitt, Opioid Analgesics. Chemistry and
Receptors, Plenum Press, New York—London, 1986.
2. G. R. Lenz, S. M. Evans, D. E. Walters, A. J. Hopfinger,
in Opiates, Academic Press, Orlando—London, 1986.
3. W. Chen, D. A. Parrish, J. R. Deschamps, A. Coop, Helv.
Chim. Acta, 2005, 88, 822.
4. H. Wu, D. Bernard, W. Chen, G. D. Strahan, J. R. Desꢀ
champs, D. A. Parrish, J. W. Lewis, A. D. MacKerell, A. Coop,
J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 1907.
5. H. Wu, T. A. Smith, H. Huang, J. B. Wang, J. R. Deschamps,
A. Coop, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2007, 17, 4829.
6. V. N. Kalinin, I. V. Shishkov, S. K. Moiseev, E. E. Shults,
G. A. Tolstikov, N. I. Sosnina, P. V. Petrovskii, K. A. Lysꢀ
senko, H. Schmidhammer, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2006, 44, 861.
7. H. Rapoport, C. H. Lovell, H. R. Reist, M. E. Warren, Jr.,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1967, 89, 1942.
In summary, the 8ꢀ[(1E)ꢀ2ꢀphenylethenyl] moiety
and, obviously, other substituents at the C(8) atom capable
of effective πꢀconjugation can affect the chemical behavior
of the codeinone and thebaine derivatives, which are the
key intermediates in the synthesis of potent physiologicalꢀ
ly active compounds of orvinol and morphinone series.
Experimental
(5α,8β)ꢀ6,7ꢀDidehydroꢀ3,6ꢀdimethoxyꢀ17ꢀmethylꢀ8ꢀ[(1E)ꢀ
2ꢀphenylethenyl]ꢀ4,5ꢀepoxymorphinan (8). To a solution of comꢀ
pound 5a (2.67 g, 6.66 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (34 mL), NaH
(0.40 g, 9.99 mmol, 60% dispersion in mineral oil) was added.
The reaction mixture was stirred at ~20 °C until nearly clear
solution was formed (20—30 min). The mixture was cooled to
–10 °C, dimethyl sulfate (0.95 mL, 9.99 mmol) was added dropꢀ
8. D. D. Weller, H. Rapoport, J. Med. Chem., 1976, 19, 1171.
Received March 29, 2010;
in revised form November 13, 2010