SCHEME 1. Synthesis of the Chiral Schiff Base
New Chiral Schiff Base as a Tridentate Ligand
for Catalytic Enantioselective Addition of
Diethylzinc to Aldehydes
Takanori Tanaka, Yorinobu Yasuda, and Masahiko Hayashi*
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Kobe UniVersity,
Kobe 657-8501, Japan
ReceiVed May 9, 2006
TABLE 1. Effect of Substituents in the Schiff Base on the
Asymmetric Addition to Benzaldehydea
entry
ligand
R1
% yieldb
% eec,d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9e
4a
5a
4b
5b
4c
5c
4d
4e
5e
H
H
Me
Me
Ph
Ph
36
53
84
90
95
94
90
93
92
18
21
88
94
90
96
86
87
95
We have developed new chiral Schiff base catalysts for the
enantioselective addition of diethylzinc reagents to aldehydes.
The reaction of benzaldehyde with diethylzinc in the presence
of 1 mol % of the chiral Schiff base catalyst proceeded to
afford 1-phenyl-1-propanol in 96% enantiomeric excess (ee).
4-tBu-C6H4
â-Np
â-Np
a Conditions: PhCHO/Et2Zn/Schiff base ) 1.0:2.0:0.05, 0 °C, 24 h.
b Determined by 1H NMR analysis after silica gel column chromatography.
c Determined by HPLC using a chiral OD-H column (DAICEL). d Absolute
configuration was determined as R by comparison of the optical rotation
values with those in the literature.9 e 1 mol % of Schiff base was used.
Since the first discovery by Oguni and Omi in 1984,1 there
have been many reports on enantioselective addition of dialkyl-
zinc to aldehydes. Most of them are catalyzed by bidentate
â-amino alcohol or its derivatives.2,3 To our knowledge, there
are only three reports using tridentate ligands;4 furthermore, all
of them afforded the alkylated products in lower enantiomeric
excess (ee). For example, Corey and Hannon reported enantio-
selective ethylation of benzaldehyde catalyzed by a tridentate
ligand derived from (+)-pseudoephedrine to give 1-phenyl-1-
propanol in 87% ee.4a In this paper, we report that our developed
tridentate chiral Schiff base catalyzed the alkylation of aldehydes
to give the alkylated products in high ee (up to 96% ee).5
The chiral Schiff bases used in our alkylation were prepared
according to the procedure shown in Scheme 1. The crucial
step was the oxidation of alcohol 2 to ketones 3; that is, the
conventional method using CrO3 afforded ketones only in low
yield (25-35%) because of oxidative decomposition of the
phenolic moiety. Fortunately, this oxidation problem was over-
come by a hydrogen transfer reaction using a Pd/C-ethylene
system.6 By the use of 30 wt % of 10% Pd/C under an ethylene
atmosphere, we obtained a high yield (83%) of ketone in the
case of R1 ) Ph. Thus, the obtained ketones 3 were condensed
with chiral â-amino alcohols that are now prepared by direct
reduction of R-amino acid as developed by Meyers7 and Abiko.8
We examined the reaction of benzaldehyde with diethylzinc
in the presence of 5 mol % of chiral Schiff bases in hexane.
Hexane or toluene was the choice for this reaction after
screening of the solvent effect. The obtained results are
summarized in Table 1. As shown in entry 6, the Schiff base
5c derived from L-tert-leucinol and 3-tert-butyl-2-hydroxyben-
zophenone afforded (R)-1-phenyl-1-propanol in 94% yield and
96% ee. When the amount of chiral Schiff base 5c was decreased
to 1 mol %, the same level of chemical yield and enantiomeric
excess were obtained (Table 2, entry 1).
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +81-78-803-5688.
(1) Oguni, N.; Omi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 2823-2824.
(2) (a) Noyori, R.; Suga, S.; Kawai, K.; Okada, S.; Kitamura, M.; Oguni,
N.; Hayashi, M.; Kaneko, T.; Matsuda, Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 1990, 382,
19-37. (b) Noyori, R.; Kitamura, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991,
30, 49-69. (c) Soai, K.; Niwa, S. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 833-856. (d) Pu,
L.; Yu, H.-B. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 757-824.
The effect of the tert-butyl group at the ortho position on the
phenolic hydroxy group should be mentioned. That is, in the
case of the use of 5 mol % of Schiff base without a tert-butyl
(3) Noyori, R. Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis; John Wiley
& Sons, Inc.: New York, 1994; Chapter 5.
(4) (a) Corey, E. J.; Hannon, F. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 5237-
5240. (b) Cherng, Y.-J.; Fang, J.-M.; Lu, T.-J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
3207-3212. (c) Danilova, T. I.; Rozenberg, V. I.; Sergeeva, E. V.; Starikova,
Z. A.; Bra¨se, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 2013-2019.
(5) (a) Hayashi, M.; Tanaka, K.; Oguni, N. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1995, 6, 1833-1836. (b) Hayashi, M.; Yoshimoto, K.; Hirata, N.; Tanaka,
K.; Oguni, N.; Harada, K.; Matsushita, A.; Kawachi, Y.; Sasaki, H. Isr. J.
Chem. 2001, 41, 241-246.
(6) (a) Hayashi, M.; Yamada, K.; Nakayama, S. Synthesis 1999, 1869-
1871. (b) Hayashi, M.; Yamada, K.; Nakayama, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 2000, 1501-1503.
(7) (a) McKennon, M. J.; Meyers, A. I.; Drauz, K.; Schwarm, M. J. Org.
Chem. 1993, 58, 3568-3571. (b) Poindexter, G. S.; Meyers, A. I.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 18, 3527-3528.
(8) Abiko, A.; Masamune, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5517-5518.
10.1021/jo060964u CCC: $33.50 © 2006 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/05/2006
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7091-7093
7091