Communications
[12] C. R. Gentry-Weeks, J. Spokes, J. Thompson, J. Biol. Chem.
1995, 270, 7695.
[13] I. Rossol, A. Puhler, J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 2968.
[14] H. Kamitani, N. Esaki, H. Tanaka, K. Soda, Agric. Biol. Chem.
1990, 54, 2069.
[15] C.-H. Tai, P. F. Cook, Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 49.
[16] J. L. Palmer, R. H. Abeles, J. Biol. Chem. 1979, 254, 1217.
[17] D. Pei, J. Zhu, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 492.
[18] V. L. Y. Yip, A. Varrot, G. J. Davies, S. S. Rajan, X. J. Yang, J.
Thompson, W. F. Anderson, S. G. Withers, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 8354.
[19] A. Varrot, V. L. Y. Yip, Y. Li, S. S. Rajan, X. Yang, W. F.
Anderson, J. Thompson, S. G. Withers, G. J. Davies, J. Mol. Biol.
2005, 346, 423.
[20] A. G. Day, Purification and Preliminary Characterization of b-
Glucosidase from Alcaligenes faecalis (ATCC 21400), MSc
Thesis, 1985.
[21] M. S. Macauley, K. A. Stubbs, D. J. Vocadlo, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 17202.
[22] J. Mullegger, M. Jahn, H. Chen, R. A. J. Warren, S. G. Withers,
Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2005, 18, 3 3 .
[23] N. D. Meadow, D. K. Fox, S. Roseman, Annu. Rev. Biochem.
1990, 59, 497.
which cannot cleave unactivated thioglycosides. The efficient
hydrolysis of thiodisaccharides therefore provides further
supporting evidence for the novel glycosidase mechanism
proposed for family 4 enzymes. Cleavage of such thioglyco-
sides at rates comparable to those of their oxygen counter-
parts is quite reasonable for the anionic mechanism proposed
but not for reactions via oxocarbenium-ion-like transition
states. The majority of glycosidases do not hydrolyze thio-
glycosidic linkages, and those that have been reported to
possess thioglycosidase activity only react with thioglycosides
containing highly activated leaving groups, as clearly demon-
strated by the Brønsted plot determined for thioglycoside
hydrolysis in the case of O-GlcNAcase.[21] The cleavage of the
thioglycosidic linkages by O-GlcNAcase does not rely on
general acid catalysis, and there is substantial development of
negative charge on the sulfur atom at the transition state.[21]
Since the cleavage of the glycosidic linkage is not rate-limiting
for BglT,[24] it is reasonable that substitution of the glycosidic
oxygen with a sulfur atom does not significantly affect the
overall rate.
[24] V. L. Y. Yip, S. G. Withers, Biochemistry 2006, 45, 571.
[25] W. P. Burmeister, S. Cottaz, H. Driguez, R. Iori, S. Palmieri, B.
Henrissat, Structure 1997, 5, 663.
On the basis of these results, it is clear that thioglycosides
should not be employed in any inhibition strategies for
family 4 enzymes whether this be for structural or mechanistic
studies or as part of any biological control strategy. Indeed,
the ability to cleave a thiodisaccharide could be a useful
diagnostic of whether a new glycosidase belongs to family 4.
Finally, these findings raise the question of whether O-C6’P is
in fact the natural substrate for BglT, or whether this enzyme
has evolved to cleave some other, as yet undiscovered,
substrate. The locations of the genes encoding many GH4
enzymes within the PEP:PTS operon argues strongly that the
disaccharide 6-phosphates are the natural substrates and that
the facile cleavage of thioglycosides is just a circumstantial
consequence of the mechanism utilized by the enzyme.
However, the uncanny similarities between the mechanisms
utilized by GH4 enzymes and by AdoHCyase suggests that
other possibilities should be kept in mind.
Received: April 10, 2006
Revised: June 20, 2006
Published online: August 17, 2006
Keywords: elimination · enzyme catalysis · glycoside hydrolase ·
.
thioether cleavage · thioglycosides
[1] Z. J. Witczak, Curr. Med. Chem. 1999, 6, 165.
[2] N. Asano, Glycobiology 2003, 13, 93R.
[3] D. Mandelman, A. Belaich, J. P. Belaich, N. Aghajari, H.
Driguez, R. Haser, J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 4127.
[4] G. Sulzenbacher, H. Driguez, B. Henrissat, M. Schulein, G. J.
Davies, Biochemistry 1996, 35, 15280.
[5] M. L. Sinnott, Chem. Rev. 1990, 90, 1171.
[6] D. L. Zechel, S. G. Withers, Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 11.
[7] D. E. Koshland, Biol. Rev. 1953, 28, 416.
[8] J. L. Jensen, W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 1476.
[9] J. P. Ferraz, E. H. Cordes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 1488.
[10] T. H. Fife, T. J. Przystas, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 292.
[11] M. Bertoldi, B. Cellini, T. Clausen, C. B. Voltattorni, Biochem-
istry 2002, 41, 9153.
6182
ꢀ 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6179 –6182