7782
P. K. Kalita et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 7779–7782
13. To a solution of 2-chloro-3-formyl quinoline 2a (8 mmol)
in dichloromethane (10 ml) were added allyl alcohol
(0.4 ml, 10 mmol) and a catalytic amount of tetrabutyl-
ammonium bromide. To this was added, 10 ml of 50%
aqueous KOH solution and the mixture was allowed to stir
for 8 h. The organic layer was separated and washed
2–3 times with water. The solvent was evaporated and the
crude product was purified by column chromatography
using 5% ethyl acetate in hexane as eluent. Compound 3a,
extraction with dichloromethane. The organic extract was
dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and then evaporated
under reduced pressure to obtain 7a. Yield 98%, mp 156–
158 °C. H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 5.12 (dd, J = 9.6,
5.8 Hz, 2H), 5.46 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 6.10 (m, 1H), 7.20–
7.60 (m, 4H), 8.15 (s, 1H), 8.46 (s, 1H). Compounds 7b
(94%) and 7c (88%) were prepared similarly.
1
17. To a mixture of oxime 7a (2 mmol) and Et3N (202 mg,
2 mmol) in dichloromethane (8 ml), 10% aqueous NaOCl
solution (3.5 ml) was added dropwise at ꢀ10 °C. The
reaction mixture was allowed to stir for 1 h at room
temperature. The organic phase was separated and the
solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Product 8a
was purified by preparative TLC using dichloromethane
and hexane (7:3) as eluent. Yield 87%, mp 203 °C. 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 4.07 (m, 2H), 4.35 (m, 1H),
4.86 (m, 2H), 7.20–7.75 (m, 4H), 7.95 (s, 1H). 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3): d 152.2 (C-11a), 153.96 (C-1a), 147.80
(C-5a), 132.10 (C-6b), 130.55 (C-6a), 127.00 (C-6), 126.15
(C-3), 124.20 (C-2), 123.95 (C-4), 112.00 (C-5), 66.85 (C-
10), 65.50 (C-9), 30.5 (C-9a). m/z [M+H]+ 227. CHN
analysis (calcd%) C, 69.02; H, 4.43; N, 12.39; C13H10N2O2
(found%) C, 68.98; H, 4.38; N, 12.34. Compounds 8b–c
were prepared similarly.
18. Compound 3a (2 mmol) and phenylhydrazine (2.5 mmol)
in 15 ml of ethanol were reacted at room temperature for
half an hour and then warmed for 10 min. The reaction
mixture was filtered hot. The solution was evaporated and
the solid compound obtained was recrystallized from
ethanol. Compound 9a, yield 87%, mp 161–162 °C. 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 5.05 (dd, J = 9.8, 6.7 Hz, 2H),
5.32 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 5.95 (m, 1H), 6.90–7.40 (m, 9H),
8.00 (s, 1H), 8.32 (s, 1H). Compounds 9b (82%) and 9c
(77%) were prepared similarly.
1
yield 78%, mp 56 °C. H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 5.30
(dd, J = 9.7, 6.8 Hz, 2H), 5.40 (d, J = 6.00 Hz, 2H), 6.29
(m, 1H), 6.95–7.80 (m, 4H), 8.20 (s, 1H), 9.80 (s, 1H).
Compound 3b (75%) and 3c (70%) were prepared as above.
14. To a solution of 2-allyloxy 3-formylquinoline 3a (2 mmol)
in 5 ml toluene was added MeNHOHÆHCl (2 mmol), and
the reaction stirred at room temperature. NaHCO3
(168 mg, 2 mmol) was added portionwise over a period
of 5 min (NaHCO3 was not required in the case of
PhNHOH) and stirring was continued for 2 h. The solvent
was removed under reduced pressure and the product 4a
was purified by preparative TLC using CHCl3 as eluent.
Compound 4a, yield 90%, mp 102 °C. 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d 3.96 (s, 3H), 5.29 (dd, J = 9.8,
6.2 Hz, 2H), 5.47 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 6.21 (m, 1H), 7.20–
7.90 (m, 4H), 8.34 (s, 1H), 8.60 (s, 1H).
15. Compound 4a (1 mmol) was refluxed in toluene (5 ml) for
10 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure.
The residue was purified by preparative TLC using ethyl
acetate/hexane (4:6) as eluent to give 5a and 6a. Com-
pound 5a: yield 75%, mp 153–154 °C. 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): d 2.90 (s, 3H), 3.22 (m, 1H), 4.30
(m, 2H), 4.43 (m, 2H), 3.86 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 7.20–7.90
(m, 4H), 8.10 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d
152.96 (C-1a), 149.1 (C-11a), 147.89 (C-5a), 130.45 (C-6a),
127.36 (C-6), 127.22 (C-3), 123.92 (C-2), 123.84 (C-4),
112.51 (C-5), 66.8 (C-10), 65.5 (C-9), 30.5 (N-CH3), 29.5
(C-9a), 28.3 (C-6b). m/z [M+H]+ 243. CHN analysis
(calcd%) C, 69.43; H, 5.78; N, 11.57; C14H14N2O2
(found%) C, 69.40; H, 5.72; N, 11.52. Compound 6a:
yield 7%, mp 109 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 2.85
(s, 3H), 3.22 (m, 1H), 4.30 (m, 2H), 4.45 (m, 2H), 3.90 (d,
J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.2–8.0 (m, 4H), 8.15 (s, 1H). 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3): d 152.80 (C-1a), 149.01 (C-11a), 147.00
(C-5a), 131.15 (C-6a), 126.86 (C-6), 126.20 (C-3), 124.00
(C-2), 123.70 (C-4), 113.00 (C-5), 67.5 (C-10), 65.5 (C-9),
31.0 (N-CH3), 29.5 (C-9a), 28.3 (C-6b). m/z [M+H]+ 243.
CHN analysis (calcd%) C, 69.43; H, 5.78; N, 11.57;
C14H14N2O2 (found%) C, 69.50; H, 5.91; N, 11.48.
19. To a suspension of phenylhydrazone 9a (2 mmol) in
carbon tetrachloride (10 ml) was added a solution of N-
chlorosuccinimide (2.5 mmol) in 10 ml of carbon tetra-
chloride. The reaction mixture was heated at 50 °C for 1 h,
then cooled and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated in
vacuo to afford the hydrazonyl chloride 10a. Chlorides
10b–c were prepared in a similar way and used in the next
step without further purification.
20. A mixture of compound 10a (2 mmol) and triethylamine
(2 mmol) was refluxed in toluene (15 ml) for 2 h. The
solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the
residue was purified by preparative TLC using chloroform
and hexane (1:2) as eluent to give 11a, yield 85%, mp
189 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 4.12 (m, 1H), 4.21
16. Compound 3a (2 mmol) in 6 ml of EtOH/H2O mixture
(1:1) was reacted with an aqueous solution of hydroxyl-
amine prepared by adding NaOH (175 mg in 4 ml H2O) to
a solution of NH2OHÆHCl (166.7 mg, 2 mmol in 3 ml
water), with stirring at room temperature. After 10 min,
the solution was clear. The reaction mixture was allowed
to stir at room temperature for 1 h after which the EtOH
was evaporated and the compound was separated by
(m, 2H), 4.69 (m, 2H), 6.95–7.72 (m, 9H), 7.82 (s, 1H). 13
C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d 154.05 (C-1a), 151.25 (C-11a),
148.00 (C-5a), 128.20 (C-6b), 129.55 (C-6a), 127.00 (C-6),
126.85, 126.20, 125.10, 124.30, 123.53 (two C), 122.19 (two
C), 121.00 [all Ar], 67.25 (C-10), 65.00 (C-9), 31.15 (C-9a).
m/z [M+H]+ 302. CHN analysis (calcd%) C, 75.75; H,
4.98; N, 13.95; C19H15N3O (found%) C, 75.65; H, 4.94; N,
13.90. Compounds 11b–c were synthesized similarly.