trans-glycosidic linkages during chain elongation, the same
ester functionality at C2 would be expected to offer anchi-
meric assistance, whereas benzyl ethers at such locations
might have the stereochemistry of glycosidation controlled
via solvent effects (e.g., CH3CN).7 In addition, a temporary
protecting group (TBDPS) is needed to mask the primary
hydroxyl on the D-glucopyranosyl subunit of 1 to allow
oxidation to the corresponding carboxylic acid. The 2-naph-
thylmethyl group (2-NAP),8 which was used to block the
C4 hydroxy group of the GlcNH2 subunit, would allow
mildly chemoselective deprotection for further elongation of
the sugar chain, and it could also be simultaneously removed
along with other permanent benzyl groups under hydro-
genolytic conditions at the final termination process. The C2
amino group of GlcNH2 would typically be protected as an
azide owing to its nonparticipating nature in coupling
reactions. It would be expected to predominantly lead to the
R-anomeric disaccharide building blocks and could be readily
transformed into the NHAc and NHCbz groups. At a later
stage, the -N3 could be selectively converted to the
-NHSO3- unit via a combination of Staudinger reaction and
N-sulfonation, whereas the -NHCbz could be expected to
reveal a free -NH2 upon hydrogenolysis. The 1,6-anhydro-
â-L-idopyranosyl sugars 5, which can be prepared from
D-glucose through C5 epimerization, serve as highly active
glycosyl acceptors because of the rigid conformation and
three equatorially substituted groups at C2, C3, and C4. The
1,6-anhydro ring of 2 can be opened, and further functional
group modification and glycosylation of the corresponding
L-idopyranosyl sugar at C6 and C1 can be carried out,
respectively. Thus, four D-glucosamine-derived glycosyl
donors 3 may be individually coupled with two D-glucopy-
ranosyl 4-alcohols 4 and two L-idopyranosyl 4-alcohols 5
via Schmidt’s trichloroacetimidate method9 to get two
sets of eight disaccharides. These 16 compounds can each
be converted into the N-acetylated and N-Cbz-protected
derivatives, generating a total of 48 disaccharide synthons 1
and 2.
Scheme 1
for determining structure-activity relationships. Such mol-
ecules are extremely difficult to acquire from natural sources,
and chemical synthesis may offer one of the best options
for securing them. Over the past few years, several ap-
proaches have been documented in the literature to prepare
specific HP and HS saccharide units.6 Herein, we report a
straightforward synthesis of the entire set of 48 disaccharide
building blocks needed for the assembly of HP and HS
oligosaccharide libraries.
The synthesis of four glycosyl donors 15-18 is shown in
Scheme 2. First, D-glucosamine-derived 1,3-diol 610 was
converted to the â-1,3-dibenzoate 7 (BzCl, Et3N, 92%). The
corresponding 3-OBn derivative 8 was obtained in 77%
overall yield via anomeric benzoylation (Bz2O, Et3N) fol-
lowed by O3 benzylation (Ag2O, BnBr). A highly regiose-
lective borane-reductive O6 ring opening of 4,6-O-naph-
thylidene acetals 7 and 8 in the presence of 5 mol % of
Our retrosynthesis of 48 disaccharide synthons 1 and 2
from two common sugars, D-glucose and D-glucosamine, is
outlined in Scheme 1. The O-sulfation pattern in the target
molecules called for strategic placement of acyl groups (Bz)
to protect those hydroxyls that would be ultimately sulfonated
and of permanent benzyl protecting groups (Bn) for those
that would remain free. For the generation of exclusive 1,2-
11
Cu(OTf)2 cleanly afforded the individual 6-alcohols 9
(6) (a) Tabeur, C.; Mallet, J.-M.; Bono, F.; Herbert, J.-M.; Petitou, M.;
Sinay¨, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 2003-2012. (b) de Paz, J.-L.;
Angulo, J.; Lassaletta, J.-M.; Nieto, P. M.; Ridondo-Horcajo, M.; Lozano,
R. M.; Gimenez-Gallego, G.; Martin-Lomas, M. ChemBioChem 2001, 2,
673-685. (c) Prabhu, A.; Venot, A.; Boons, G.-J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4975-
4978. (d) Orgueira, H. A.; Bartolozzi, A.; Schell, P.; Litjens, R. E. J. N.;
Palmacci, E. R.; Seeberger, P. H. Chem.-Eur. J. 2003, 9, 140-169. (e)
Poletti, L.; Lay, L. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 2999-3024. (f) Karst, N. A.;
Linhardt, R. J. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 1993-2031. (g) Lee, J.-C.;
Lu, X.-A.; Kulkarni, S. S.; Wen, Y. S.; Hung, S.-C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 476-477. (h) Yu, H. N.; Furukawa, J.-I.; Ikeda, T.; Wong, C.-
H. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 723-726. (i) Lubineau, A.; Lortat-Jacob, H.; Gavard,
O.; Sarrazin, S.; Bonnaffe´, D. Chem.-Eur. J. 2004, 10, 4265-4282. (j)
Code, J. D. C.; Stubba, B.; Schiattarella, M.; Overkleeft, H. S.; van Boeckel,
C. A. A.; van Boom, J. H.; van der Marel, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 3767-3773. (k) Noti, C.; Seeberger, P. H. Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 731-
756.
(89%) and 10 (86%), which were subsequently benzoylated
to give the 6-OBz derivatives 11 and 12 in 95% and 92%
yields, respectively. Benzylation of 9 or 10 employing BnBr/
Ag2O or BnBr/NaH did not succeed. Alternatively, TMSOTf-
(7) Schmidt, R. R.; Behrendt, M.; Toepfer, A. Synlett 1990, 694-696.
(8) Xia, J.; Abbas, S. A.; Locke, R. D.; Piskorz, C. F.; Alderfer, J. L.;
Matta, K. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 169-172.
(9) Schmidt, R. R.; Kinzy, W. AdV. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1994,
50, 21-123.
(10) Lu, X.-A.; Chou, C.-H.; Wang, C.-C.; Hung, S.-C. Synlett 2003,
1364-1366.
(11) Shie, C.-R.; Tzeng, Z.-H.; Kulkarni, S. S.; Uang, B.-J.; Hsu, C.-Y.;
Hung, S.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1665-1668.
5996
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 26, 2006