K.J. Kilpin et al. / Polyhedron 26 (2007) 204–213
211
13C–{1H} NMR, d 53.5 (CH2Cl2), 53.0 (CH3), 75.5 (CH2),
122.4–144.5 (aryl C), 172.7, 177.5 (C@O).
product was then washed with ice-cold methanol
(2 · 10 mL) and diethyl ether (10 mL) before being dried
under vacuum giving 324 mg (81%) of 11. M.p. 194–
196 ꢁC (decomp.). Anal. Calc. for C30H26N7O4S4Au: C,
41.2; H, 3.0; N, 11.2. Found: C, 40.8; H, 3.0; N, 10.9%.
IR: t(NH) 3430 cmÀ1 (w), t(SN) 1459 cmÀ1 (vs), t(SO2,
sym) 1323 cmÀ1 (s), t(SO2, asym) 1131 cmÀ1 (s). ESI MS:
Cone voltage 20 V: NaCl added, m/z 677 (100%, [M-
stz+Cl+Na]+), 896 (72%, [M+Na]+). 1H NMR, d 4.64
(br s, 2H), 5.69 (s, 4H, NH2), 5.75 (br s, 2H), 6.51 (d,
2H), 6.56 (d, 1H), 6.66 (d, 1H), 6.77 (d, 1H), 6.90 (t, 1H),
7.13 (d, 1H), 7.21 (t, 1H), 7.31 (d, 1H), 7.36 (d, 1H), 7.52
(t, 1H), 8.02 (d, 1H), 8.22 (t, 1H), 8.55 (d, 1H). The com-
pound was too insoluble for a satisfactory 13C–{1H}
NMR spectrum.
5.6. Synthesis of (2-bp)Au(isa)2 (8)
The complex (2-bp)AuCl2 (3) (200 mg, 0.46 mmol) and
isatin (270 mg, 1.84 mmol) were added to refluxing metha-
nol (40 mL). While stirring, trimethylamine (2 mL, excess)
was added, resulting in the solution changing from deep
red to bright orange. The solution was further refluxed with
stirring for 20 min. Water (50 mL) was added, resulting in
the deposition of orange microcrystals which were collected
by filtration. The crude product was recrystallised from
dichloromethane and pentane, filtered, washed with water
(2 · 10 mL) and diethyl ether (10 mL) and dried under vac-
uum to give 266 mg (88%) of 8. M.p. 225 ꢁC (decomp.).
Anal. Calc. for C28H18N3O4Au Æ 0.12CH2Cl2: C, 50.6; H,
2.8; N, 6.3. Found: C, 49.7; H, 3.0; N, 6.3%. IR: t(C@O)
1736 cmÀ1 (s), 1692 cmÀ1 (s) and 1605 cmÀ1 (s). ESI MS:
Cone voltage 20 V: m/z 680 (100%, [M+Na]+), 569 (67%,
[M-isa + Cl + Na]), 565 (56%, [M-isa+MeO+Na]+). 1H
NMR, d 4.35 (br. s, 2H), 5.33 (s, 0.24H, from CH2Cl2),
6.87 (t, 1H), 6.95 (t, 1H), 7.01 (d, 1H), 7.18–7.51 (m,
11H), 7.81 (d, 1H), 8.06 (t, 1H). 13C–{1H} NMR, d 47.7
(CH2), 53.5 (CH2Cl2), 112.4–157.3 (aryl C), 162.9, 166.8,
185.1, 189.0 (C@O).
6. X-ray crystallography
X-ray intensity data were collected on a Bruker CCD
diffractometer using standard procedures and software.
Empirical absorption corrections were applied (SADABS)
[52]. Structures were solved by direct methods and devel-
oped and refined on F 2o using the SHELX programmes [53]
operating under WINGX [54,55]. Hydrogen atoms were
included in calculated positions. For both structures there
was potential pseudo symmetry which could have led to
disorder between the phenyl and pyridyl rings of the
cyclometallated ligand. However, as found for other
examples [12], the assignment of the metallated C and
N atoms could be done unambiguously, showing there
was no disorder. As discussed earlier [12]: (i) the N posi-
tion was revealed with higher electron density than the C
in the difference map; (ii) the Uiso values for the atoms
were similar when refined as allocated, but were quite dif-
ferent if the assignment was reversed, and R1 values
increased in each case on changing the assignment; (iii)
the differences in the Au–N distances to the sacc or phth
ligands were consistent with the expected trans influences
of C and N as assigned.
5.7. Synthesis of (damp)Au(isa)2 (9)
The complex (damp)AuCl2 (1) (100 mg, 0.25 mmol) and
isatin (148 mg, 1 mmol) were stirred in refluxing methanol
(30 mL). Trimethylamine (2 mL, excess) was added, result-
ing in the solution turning from orange to deep red, and the
mixture was refluxed for a further 10 min during which
time orange microcrystals were deposited. After cooling
to room temperature, the product was filtered, washed with
water (2 · 10 mL) and diethyl ether (10 mL) and dried
under vacuum to give 117 mg (75%) of product. M.p.
210–212 ꢁC (decomp.). Anal. Calc. for C25H20N3O4Au: C,
48.2; H, 3.2; N, 6.7. Found: C, 47.7; H, 3.4; N, 6.7%. IR:
t(C@O) 1730 cmÀ1 (s), 1701 cmÀ1 (m), 1682 cmÀ1 (s),
1603 cmÀ1 (s). ESI MS: Cone voltage 20 V: m/z 646
(100%, [M+Na]+), 465 (55%, [(damp)2Au]+), 678 (35%,
6.1. Structure of (2-bp)Au(sacc)2 (4)
White prism crystals of 4 (M.p. 131–134 ꢁC) were
obtained from CH2Cl2/Et2O.
1
[M+Na+MeOH]+), 1269 (27%, [2M+Na]+). H NMR, d
3.24 (s, 3H), 3.48 (s, 3H), 4.17 (d, 1H), 4.89 (d, 1H), 6.85
(t, 1H), 6.92 (t, 1H), 7.06–7.39 (m, 13H), 7.43 (t, 1H).
The compound was too insoluble for a satisfactory 13C–
{1H} NMR spectrum.
Crystal
data:
C26H18AuN3O6S2 Æ 0.5CH2Cl2 Æ 0.5-
C4H10O, M = 809.04, orthorhombic, space group Pccn,
˚
a = 15.7051(2), b = 18.7045(3), c = 19.5764(1) A, V =
5750.7(1) A , T = 84(2) K, Z = 8, Dcalc = 1.869 g cmÀ3
,
3
˚
l(Mo Ka) = 5.405 mmÀ1, F(000) = 3168; 32131 reflections
collected with 2ꢁ < h < 26ꢁ, 5862 unique (Rint = 0.0309) used
after correction for absorption (Tmax,min = 0.521, 0.385).
Crystal dimensions = 0.22 · 0.20 · 0.14 mm3.
5.8. Synthesis of (2-bp)Au(stz)2 (11)
The complex (2-bp)AuCl2 (3) (200 mg, 46 mmol) and
sulfathiazole (10) (257 mg, 1 mmol) were stirred in reflux-
ing methanol (25 mL). Trimethylamine (2 mL, excess)
was added, resulting in the rapid deposition of pale yellow
microcrystals. The mixture was refluxed with stirring for a
further 2 h before being cooled in ice and filtered. The
When the main molecule had been refined, there was sig-
nificant residual electron density around special positions
with 2-fold symmetry at 41; 14; z. These appeared to be a mix-
ture of CH2Cl2 and Et2O, but were very disordered and
could not be sensibly modelled. This electron density was