Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Strategy for BI 201302
Figure 1. Macrocyclic HCV inhibitors.
metathesis (RCM) reaction must be overcome, which is a
typical problem for macrocyclization. The high ruthe-
nium (Ru) catalyst loading (3À5 mol %) for RCM
reaction was impractical due to not only its high cost
but also the extreme difficulty of removing high levels
of residual Ru metal from the Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredient (API). Its long reaction time (∼24 h) and risk
for epimerization6 were also troublesome for production.
Second, the assembly sequence via double SN2 reactions
was lengthy and costly, and a higher level of the assembly
convergency called for a direct installation of the quino-
line heterocycle to the macrocycle through an SNAr reac-
tion to avoid the double inversions of the stereocenter at
the C-4 position of the hydroxyproline moiety (4).
The development of a more efficient RCM started from
various initial observations on our early RCM process.
It was noticed that the remote substituent at the C-4 posi-
tion of the hydroxyproline moiety in 4 had a small but
detectable effect5 on the RCM rate and therefore on the
Effective Molarity7 (EM = kintra/kinter). This small effect
was tentatively ascribed to subtle conformational factors.
Also, when the initiation of the reaction was monitored
using a substoichiometric amount of Grubbs’ catalyst
(7, Scheme 2), carbene transfer occurred to a large extent
(96%) at the vinylcyclopropane moiety 8, where the Ru
may be stabilized by chelation to the carbonyl group.
Such stabilization, in turn, may reduce the concentration
of the active Ru catalyst in the reaction and negatively
affect the rate of the RCM reaction.6 Guided by these
observations, we postulated that substitution on the NH
of the P1 amide (vinylcyclopropane amimo acid unit)
would change such coordinative stabilization and its
conformation in which the Ru-insertion pathway would
be altered. A number of derivatives were subsequently
prepared, in which the amide bond was protected with
various removable groups.8,9
profound effects on the efficiency of the RCM reaction.
As shown in Scheme 2, the simple N-Boc substrate 6 not
only switches the initiation site of the RCM reaction
through interrupting the coordinative stabilization by
the ester group but also dramatically increase its effective
molarity which enables the RCM reaction to be per-
formed at much higher concentrations. As a result, in
comparison with the corresponding NÀH substrate 5 the
desired RCM reaction proceeded 3À4 times faster, and
more importantly it could be carried out at a 10À20-fold
greater concentration (0.1À0.2 M) which was unprece-
dented for this type of macrocyclization. In consideration
of the reversible nature of the metathesis reaction, the
origins of this “N-Boc effect” seem to be grounded in
favorable kinetic and thermodynamic effects. The strate-
gic induction of an electron-withdrawing group on the
RCM linker can direct the initiation site and have a
remarkable effect on the RCM, hence complementing
the known relay strategy;10,11 also it increases the thermo-
dynamic EM, presumably by reducing the ring strain of
the macrocyclic product because of its favored conforma-
tional characteristics. This hypothesis is supported by
theoretical analysis9,12 through the calculation of the con-
formational energy change of the macrocycle between the
open chain molecules with and without Boc substitution.
With the critical RCM obstacle resolved, the synthesis
of BI 201302 used similar building blocks developed for
BILN 2061.5a,13 For preparation of the RCM precursor,
(S)-2-(tert-butyloxycarbonyl)-amino-8-nonenoic acid (12)
was first coupled with trans-hydroxyl-proline ester (13)
(10) Change of initiation site is known to affect RCM. See: Wallace,
D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1912–1915.
(11) Hoye, T. R.; Jeffrey, C. S.; Tennakoon, M. A.; Wang, J.; Zhao,
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10210–10211.
As reported in our preliminary studies, the modifica-
tions of the RCM substrates 6, through introducing
a substituent on the NH of the P1 amide, led to the
€
(12) Jaguar, v 6.5; Schrodinger, Inc.: New York, 2006.
(13) (a) Beaulieu, P. L.; Gillard, J.; Bailey, M. D.; Boucher, C.;
Ducepee, J.-S.; Simoneau, B.; Wang, X.-J.; Zhang, L.; Grozinger, K.;
Houpis, I.; Farina, V.; Heimroth, H.; Krueger, T.; Schnaubelt, J. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 5869–5879. (b) Faucher, A.-M.; Bailey, M. D.; Beaulieu,
P. L.; Brochu, C.; Duceppe, J.-S.; Ferland, J.-M.; Ghiro, E.; Gorys, V.;
Halmos, T.; Kawai, S. H.; Poirier, M.; Simoneau, B.; Tsantrizos, Y. S.;
(6) Zeng, X.; Wei, X.; Farina, V.; Napolitano, E.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, L.;
Haddad, N.; Yee, N. K.; Grinberg, N.; Shen, S.; Senanayake, C. H.
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8864.
(7) Mitchell, L.; Parkinson, J. A.; Percy, J. M.; Singh, K. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 2389–2395.
(8) Shu, C. (2007). PCT Int. Appl. WO 2007030656.
(9) Shu, C.; Zeng, X.; Hao, M.-H.; Wei, X.; Yee, N. K.; Busacca,
C. A.; Han, Z.; Farina, V.; Senanayake, C. H. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1303.
ꢁ
Llinas-Brunet, M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6 (17), 2901–2904. (c) Wang, X.-j.;
Zhang, L.; Smith-Keenan, L. L.; Houpis, I. N.; Farina, V. Org. Process
Res. Dev. 2007, 11, 60–63. (d) Frutos, R. P.; Haddad, N.; Houpis, I. N.;
Johnson, M.; Smith-Keenan, L. L.; Fuchs, V.; Yee, N. K.; Farina, V.;
Faucher, A-M; Brochu, C.; Hache, B.; Duceppe, J.-S.; Beaulieu, P.
Synthesis 2006, 15, 2563–2567.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 5, 2013
1017