K. A. Emmitte et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 1694–1697
1697
Table 4
2. Chabner, B. A.; Ryan, D. P.; Paz-Ares, L.; Garcia-Carbonero, R.; Calabresi, P. In
Goodman s the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics; Hardman, J. G., Limbird, L.
E., Gilman, A. G., Eds., 10th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 2001; pp 1417–1425.
3. (a) Warner, S. L.; Stephens, B. J.; Von Hoff, D. D. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2008, 10, 122;
(b) McInnes, C.; Mezna, M.; Fischer, P. M. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 181.
4. (a) Barr, F. A.; Sillje, H. H. W.; Nigg, E. A. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5, 429; (b)
Fisher, R. A. H.; Ferris, D. K. Curr. Med. Chem. Immun. Endocr. Metab. Agents 2002,
2, 125; (c) Glover, D. M.; Hagan, I. M.; Tavares, A. A. M. Genes Dev. 1998, 12,
3777.
Expanded kinase selectivity panel
a
Kinase
IC50 (nM)
24
25
PLK1
PLK3
Nek2
PDGFR1b
PIM-1
2
270*
25
110*
340*
390*
530*
800
2
630*
21*
420*
310*
—
440*
1200*
5. Liu, X.; Erikson, R. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 5789.
6. Elez, R.; Piiper, A.; Kronenberger, B.; Kock, M.; Brendel, M.; Hermann, E.;
Pliquett, U.; Neumann, E.; Zeuzem, S. Oncogene 2003, 22, 69.
PI3K-
c
7. Takai, N.; Hamanaka, R.; Yoshimatsu, J.; Miyakawa, I. Oncogene 2005, 24, 287.
8. Emmitte, K. A.; Andrews, C. W.; Badiang, J. G.; Davis-Ward, R. G.; Dickson, H. D.;
Drewry, D. H.; Emerson, H. K.; Epperly, A. H.; Hassler, D. F.; Knick, V. B.; Kuntz,
K. W.; Lansing, T. J.; Linn, J. A.; Mook, R. A., Jr.; Nailor, K. E.; Salovich, J. M.;
Spehar, G. M.; Cheung, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 1018.
9. Lansing, T. J.; McConnell, R. T.; Duckett, D. R.; Spehar, G. M.; Knick, V. B.;
Hassler, D. F.; Noro, N.; Furuta, M.; Emmitte, K. A.; Gilmer, T. M.; Mook, R. A., Jr.;
Cheung, M. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007, 6, 450.
PI3K-d
VEGFR2
Nuak1
Others
840*
2000*
>1000 (50 kinases)
>1000 (48 kinases)
a
Data are the average of n P 2, except where noted with (*), which is n = 1.
10. The PLK1 enzyme assay was conducted using the kinase domain only. The PLK3
assay was conducted using full length enzyme. Both were in an SPA format. For
a complete description see Ref. 9.
11. Cell proliferation assays: Cells were seeded in 96-well dishes, incubated
overnight at 37 °C, and treated with various concentrations of inhibitors for
72 h. Cell proliferation was quantified using the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell
Viability Assay (Promega, Madison, WI), following the manufacturer’s
recommendations. IC50 values were determined from using a 4-parameter
curve fit software package (XLfit4).
O
O
N
N
S
S
N
N
NH2
NH2
O
X
O
O
N
N
N
F3C
12. The compound was first dissolved in DMSO in a concentrated form (10 or
20 mM) followed by spiking a fixed volume of the DMSO stock solution into the
final buffer. Two samples were prepared for each compound. One (the standard
GSK461364
24 X = CF3
25 X = Cl
sample) contained the compound at a fixed concentration of 20
aqueous/organic mixed solvent cocktail. The other (test sample) contained the
compound at a maximum total concentration of 200 M in, pH 7.4, 0.05 M
lM in an
l
Figure 4. GSK461364.
phosphate buffer. The test sample was spun for 15 min to remove any
undissolved solid. HPLC analyses were performed on these samples. The peak
areas were used for computing the solubility.
than 100-fold in all other cases, with the exception of PDGFR1b for
24, which is approximately 50-fold selective versus that enzyme.
In summary, the appendage of cyclic amine functionality to the
6-position of the benzimidazole of thiophene inhibitors was used
to afford compounds with suitable potency, selectivity, solubility,
and protein binding for progression into advanced assays. Subse-
quent work within this chemical template resulted in the discovery
of GSK461364 (Fig. 4), a close structural analog of 24 and 25.19
GSK461364 is currently under evaluation in clinical trials. Further
communications regarding the discovery and profile of GSK461364
are planned.
13. Stock solutions of compound were spiked into human plasma at target
concentrations of 2000 ng/mL. The mixtures were inverted gently several
times to insure homogeneity and triplicate 50 lL aliquots were collected to
verify initial concentrations. Following assembly of dialysis plate (HTDialysis
membrane strips, molecular weight cut off limit of 12,000–14,000 daltons),
spiked plasma (150
lL) was placed in the donor compartment of the well and
phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4 (150
lL) in the receiver compartment. Eight
wells were set up per compound and plasma type. Plate was placed in a 37 °C
incubator on a plate shaker. Following the 6-h incubation period, the plate was
removed. Single 50 lL aliquots from each donor and receiver compartment
(per well) were analyzed. Sample analysis was by LC/MS/MS (results reported
as Drug Peak Area/Internal Standard Peak Area ratios).
14. Hornberger, K. H.; Badiang, J. G.; Salovich, J. M.; Kuntz, K. W.; Emmitte, K. A.;
Cheung, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 6348.
Acknowledgments
15. Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1.
16. Hornberger, K.; Cheung, M.; Pobanz, Mark A.; Emmitte, Kyle A.; Kuntz, Kevin
W.; Badiang, Jennifer G. PCT Int. Appl. 2007, WO 2007030366.
17. Other kinases were screened using conditions and assays optimized for each.
18. Hayward, D. G.; Fry, A. M. Cancer Lett. 2006, 237, 155.
19. Kuntz, K.; Salovich, J.; Mook, R.; Emmitte, K.; Chamberlain, S.; Rheault, T.;
Hornberger, K.; Emerson, H.; Smith, S.; Wilson, B.; Davis-Ward, R.; Donaldson,
K.; Adjabeng, G.; Nailor, K.; Hassler, D.; Smith, G.; Lansing, T.; Duckett, D.;
Knick, V.; McConnell, R.; Jackson, J.; Cheung, M. Abstract of Papers, 98th Annual
Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, Los Angeles, CA;
American Association for Cancer Research: Philadelphia, PA, 2007; Abstract
4171.
We thank Helen Gao for cell proliferation data, Xiaoliu Geng for
HTS solubility data, and Diane Talaber for human protein binding
data.
References and notes
1. Ruddon, R. W. Cancer Biology, 3rd ed.; Oxford University: New York, 1995.
Chapter 10.