4818
J. C. Kern et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 4816–4818
Table 4
Nuclear receptor antagonist cross-activities of 2, 15, and 20
N
N
N
N
Me
Me
O
N
OH
15
20
a
b
b
b
b
Compd
PR IC50 (nM)
ER IC50 (nM)
AR IC50 (nM)
GR IC50 (nM)
MR IC50 (nM)
2
15
20
0.2
3
3
5000
NAc
NA
6.9
100
165
0.6
NA
NA
590
NA
NA
a
50% inhibitory concentration of tested compounds on 1 nM progesterone induced alkaline phosphatase activity in the human T47D breast carcinoma cell line. Values
represent the average of at least duplicate determinations. The standard deviation for the assay was typically 20% of the mean or less.
b
Experimental values represented the average of at least duplicate determinations. The standard deviation for these assays was typically 30% of mean or less. See
reference for details.
c
Not active up to 10 lM concentration.
tent with an IC50 of 28 nM and 33 nM, respectively. The tetrahydro-
naphthalenols also displayed good PR antagonist potency. Unsub-
stituted (8) or 1-methyl (9) or 1-propargyl (10) analogs showed
good PR antagonist potency with an IC50 of 6–10 nM. Compound
11, with a phenyl substitution resulted in several fold reduction
in potency.
strated good in vitro selectivity for the PR over other steroid
receptors with an improved selectivity profile compared to
mifepristone.
Acknowledgment
In an effort to examine the SAR of acyclic analogs, the saturated
ring was excised to yield compound 13. Compared to the tetrahy-
dronaphthalenone analog 6, the acyclic methyl ketone 13 was
nearly 30-fold less potent. Additional ketone analogs were pre-
pared and demonstrated a broad range of PR antagonist potency
(Table 2). The ethyl, thienyl, and phenyl substituted ketone analogs
were weaker PR antagonists with IC50 values of 115–300 nM. Sur-
prisingly, the t-butyl group (15) substantially increased PR antago-
nist potency with an IC50 = 3 nM which was over 30-fold more
potent than the methyl and ethyl analogs (Table 2).16 Conversion
of ketones 13–15 into oximes gave compounds 18–20 which were
also PR antagonists. The oximes exhibited a similar SAR trend as
that of their ketone analogs with the t-butyl analog being most po-
tent. However, the methyl and ethyl oxime analogs 18 and 19 were
more potent than the corresponding ketones 13 and 14. The PR
antagonist potency of benzyl alcohols 21–25 is listed in Table 3.
These compounds showed moderate PR antagonist potency (IC50
24–118 nM). In contrast to the SAR of their ketone and oxime ana-
logs, 1-substitution (R) in the alcohol series did not significantly
impact the PR antagonist potency. The t-butyl analog 23 was sim-
ilar in potency to the methyl (21) and ethyl (22) derivatives.
Compounds 15 and 20 were evaluated for their selectivity
against other steroid receptors by using a Gal4-DNA binding do-
main (DBD)-hormone receptor ligand binding domain (LBD) one-
or two-hybrid assay for each receptor17 (Table 4). Compared to
the steroidal PR antagonist mifepristone (2), both compounds 15
and 20 are more selective for the PR over other steroid receptors.
Although these compounds showed moderate antagonist activity
at the AR, they displayed no activity at the ER, GR, or MR in this as-
say. This suggests that these novel PR antagonists will likely have
less GR-related side effects.
We thank Drs. Ronald Magolda, Richard Lyttle, and Magid
Abou-Gharbia for support and the assistance of Department of
Analytical Chemistry for analytical data.
References and notes
1. Yuzpe, A. A. J. Reprod. Med. 2002, 47, 967.
2. Brown, A.; Cheng, L.; Lin, S.; Baird, D. T. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 63.
3. Kettel, L. M.; Murphy, A. A.; Morales, A. J.; Ulmann, A.; Baulieu, E. E.; Yen, S. S.
Fertil. Steril. 1996, 65, 23.
4. Murphy, A. A.; Kettel, L. M.; Morales, A. J.; Roberts, V. J.; Yen, S. S. J. Clin.
Endocrinol. Metab. 1993, 76, 513.
5. Brogden, R. N.; Goa, K. L.; Faulds, D. Drugs 1993, 45, 384.
6. Combs, D. W.; Reese, K.; Cornelius, L. A. M.; Gunnet, J. W.; Cryan, E. V.; Granger,
K. S.; Jordan, J. J.; Demarest, K. T. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4880.
7. Kurihara, K.; Tanabe, K.; Yamamoto, Y.; Shinei, R.; Ajito, K.; Okonogi, T. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 1837.
8. Zhi, L.; Tegley, C. M.; Pio, B.; Edwards, J. P.; Motamedi, M.; Jones, T. K.;
Marschke, K. B.; Mais, D. E.; Risek, B.; Schrader, W. T. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46,
4104.
9. Jain, N.; Allan, G.; Linton, O.; Tannenbaum, P.; Chen, X.; Xu, J.; Zhu, P.; Gunnet,
J.; Demarest, K.; Lundeen, S.; Murray, W.; Sui, Z. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009,
19, 3977.
10. Wang, Y.; Duraiswami, C.; Madauss, K. P.; Tran, T. B.; Williams, S. P.; Deng, S.;
Graybill, T. L.; Hammond, M.; Jones, D. G.; Grygielko, E. T.; Bray, J. D.;
Thompson, S. K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 4916.
11. Collins, M. A.; Hudak, V.; Bender, R.; Fensome, A.; Zhang, P.; Miller, L.;
Winneker, R. C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Cohen, J.; Unwalla, R. J.; Wrobel, J. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 2185.
12. Fensome, A.; Bender, R.; Chopra, R.; Cohen, J.; Collins, M. A.; Hudak, V.;
Malakian, K.; Lockhead, S.; Olland, A.; Svenson, K.; Terefenko, E. A.; Unwalla, R.
J.; Wilhelm, J. M.; Wolfrom, S.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, P.; Winneker, R. C.;
Wrobel, J. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 5092.
13. Zhang, P.; Terefenko, E. A.; Fensome, A.; Wrobel, J.; Winneker, R.; Lundeen, S.;
Marschke, K. B.; Zhang, Z. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 4379.
14. Zhang, P.; Kern, J. C.; Terefenko, E. A.; Trybulski, E. J. US Patent
20070066628A1; US Patent 7,319,152.
15. Kern, J. C.; Terefenko, E.; Trybulski, E.; Berrodin, T. J.; Cohen, J.; Winneker, R. C.;
Yudt, M. R.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 6666.
16. Analytical data for 5-[4-(2,2-dimethylpropanoyl)phenyl]-1-methyl-1H-
In summary, 1-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carbonitrile containing
tetrahydronaphthalenones and analogs were evaluated as PR
antagonists. From these scaffolds, a number of PR antagonists with
low nanomolar in vitro potency were identified, most notably acy-
clic ketone 15 and oxime 20. Compounds 15 and 20 also demon-
pyrrole-2-carbonitrile (15).
A
white solid: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) 7.83 (d,
J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.63 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.07 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 6.47 (d,
J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 1.31 (s, 9H). HRMS: calcd for C17H18N2O + H+,
267.14919; found (ESI, [M+H]+), 267.1494.
17. Sadowski, I.; Bell, B.; Broad, P.; Hollis, M. Gene 1992, 118, 137.