G.K. Dey et al.: Micropyretic synthesis of NiAl containing Ti and B
ciated increase in temperature. The effect would have
been more substantial had the amount of TiB2 formed
been larger.
higher and higher amounts of Ni, ultimately leading to
the formation of the NiAl phase. Ti and B initially got
incorporated in the Al-rich phases and were later passed
on to the phases which became progressively richer in
Ni. The TiB2 phase formed only after the formation of
the NiAl phase was complete.
A comparison can be made between the mechanism of
synthesis of the single-phase NiAl alloy and the alloy
studied in the present work where the final microstruc-
ture had more than one phase. It has been observed that,
in the case of NiAl, the first stage in the synthesis is
melting of Al. The molten Al reacts with Ni to form
Al-rich phases first. These then react with more of Ni,
leading to the formation of phases which contain higher
and higher amounts of Ni such as NiAl3 and Ni2Al3. It
may be noted that the mechanism of formation of NiAl
from elemental powders reported in several studies14,15 is
very similar to the one described here for the two-phase
alloy containing Ti and B additions. This is not surprising
in view of the fact that the addition of Ti alone or along
with B was not found to influence the ignition tempera-
ture of the compacts (Table III) of these alloys. This
indicated that the mechanism of formation of the NiAl
phase remained similar and that this was the first phase to
form. Ti and B got incorporated in the intermediate
phases as these formed. The formation of the TiB2 phase
occurs only after the NiAl phase formation was nearing
completion.
REFERENCES
1. R.D. Noebe, R.R. Bowman, and M.V. Nathal, Int. Mater. Rev. 38,
193 (1993).
2. V.I. Levit, I.A. Bul, J. Hu, and M.J. Kaufmann, Scr. Mater. 34,
1925 (1996).
3. W.A. Kayseer, R. Laag, J.C. Murray, and G.E. Petzow, Int. J.
Powder Met. 27, 43 (1991).
4. R. Darolia, J. Met. 3, 44 (1991).
5. C.T. Liu and C.L. White, Scr. Mater. 20, 1613 (1986).
6. E.P. George and C.T. Liu, J. Mater. Res. 5, 754 (1990).
7. T. Cheng and H.M. Flower, Acta Met. Mater. 42, 1399 (1994).
8. D.J. Whittenberger, R.K. Viswanadham, S.K. Mannan, and
K.S. Kumar, J. Mater. Res. 4, 1164 (1989).
9. H.P. Li and J.A. Sekhar, J. Mater. Sci. 30, 4628 (1995).
10. J. Subramanyan and M. Vijayakumar, J. Mater. Sci. 27, 6249
(1992).
11. K.A. Philopt, Z.A. Munir, and J.B. Holt, J. Mater. Sci. 22, 159
(1987).
12. N.A. Martirosyan, S.K. Dolukhanyanand, and A.G. Mershanov,
Combust. Explos. Shock Waves (Engl. Transl.) 19, 569 (1985).
13. V.V. Boldyrev, V.V. Alekshandrov, M.A. Korchagin, B.P. Tolo-
chko, S.N. Guesenko, A.S. Sokolov, M.A. Shermonov, and
N.Z. Lyakhov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. USSR 259, 1127 (1981).
14. G.K. Dey and J.A. Sekhar, Met. Mater. Trans. 28, 905 (1997).
15. V.V. Aleksandrov and M.A. Korchagin, Combust. Explos. Shock
Waves (Engl. Transl.) 23, 557 (1987).
16. V.V. Alekshandrov, M.A. Korchagin, B.P. Tolchonko,
S.N. Gusenko, A.S. Sokolov, and M.A. Sheromov, Combust. Ex-
plos. Shock Waves (Engl. Transl.) 19, 30 (1984).
17. D.C. Dunand, J.L. Sommer, and A. Mortensen, in Processing and
Fabrication of Advanced Materials for High Temperature Appli-
cations II, edited by T.A. Srivatsan and R.A. Ravi (TMS, War-
rendale, PA, 1993), p. 635.
18. D.C. Dunand, J.L. Sommer, and A. Mortensen, Met. Trans. 24A,
2161 (1992).
19. O. Kubaschewski and C.B. Alcock, in Metallurgical Thermo-
chemistry, International Series on Materials Science and Technol-
ogy, edited by G.V. Raynor (Pergamon Press, Oxford, United
Kingdom, 1989).
20. R. Hultgren, P.D. Desai, D.T. Hawkins, M. Gleiser, and K. McKelly,
Selected Values of Thermodynamic Properties of Binary Alloys
(ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1973).
21. L. Kaufman and H. Bernstein, in Computer Calculation of Phase
Diagrams, Refractory Materials, A Series of Monographs Vol. 4,
edited by J.L. Margrave (Academic Press, New York, 1970).
22. H.P. Li and J.A. Sekhar, J. Mater. Res. 8, 2515 (1993).
23. H.P. Li and J.A. Sekhar, Mater. Sci. Eng. A160, 221 (1993).
24. H.P. Li and J.A. Sekhar, in Proceedings of the First International
Conference on Advanced Synthesis of Engineered Materials,
San Francisco, CA, edited by J.J. Moore, E.J. Lavernia, and
F.H. Froes (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1993), p. 25.
25. H.P. Li and J.A. Sekhar, J. Mater. Res. 10, 2471 (1995).
26. Hj. Feng and J.J. Moore, Prog. Mater. Sci. 39, 275 (1995).
27. Y.S. Naiborodenko and V.I. Itin, Combust. Explos. Shock Waves
(Engl. Transl.) 11, 734 (1995).
IV. CONCLUSIONS
On the basis of the observations made in this work, the
following conclusions could be drawn:
(1) The microstructure of the micropyretically synthe-
sized quaternary alloy comprised the NiAl and the TiB2
phases in the unpreheated specimens. The former was the
matrix phase where as the latter was present as a grain
boundary phase. No specific orientation relationship
between these phases was observed. The microstruc-
ture was different from that of binary NiAl because of
the additional heat generated by the reaction between
Ti and B.
(2) The extent of preheat had a major influence on the
microstructure and the nature of the phases present in the
micropyretically synthesized Ni45Al45Ti8B2 alloy. In
preheated specimens of this alloy, the formation of the
TiB phase occurred in addition to that of the TiB2 phase.
(3) A thermodynamic analysis of the process of syn-
thesis was carried out, and it could be inferred that, in the
alloys having Ti and B, the adiabatic temperature as well
as the melted fraction would be higher. This inference
was found to be consistent with the microstructural ob-
servations.
(4) The mechanism of synthesis of the two-phase mi-
crostructure involved the formation of the NiAl phase
first. This phase formed through a sequence starting with
the formation of the Al-rich phases. Ni reacted with the
Al-rich phases to yield progressively the phases having
74
J. Mater. Res., Vol. 15, No. 1, Jan 2000
Downloaded: 31 Mar 2015
IP address: 203.64.11.45