S. R. Byeon et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 1466–1470
1469
Figure 4. Compound (finally 10 lM) cytotoxicities by MTT assay on HT-22 cell. The cells were treated with the compounds in media with 10% fetal
bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (totally 0.5% DMSO). In control, the cells were only treated with the same media (0.5% DMSO).
In the structure–activity relationship, the central pyridine
or benzene did not affect the IC50 and R1 substituents in
the central ring also did not show a meaningful effect (I-
13–18 in Table 1). The value of IC50 was increased slightly
in order of halogen < Me < OMe < NMe2. The com-
pounds (II-12, 13, and 14) with only one substituent (dim-
ethylamine) at C-4 position in the terminal aromatic ring
showed lower activity than compound (II-3) with two
substituents (dimethylamine and methoxy) both at C-3
and C-4.
Additional assays including in vitro BBB penetration,
protection effect of toxicity induced by Ab 42 fibrils,
in vivo pharmacokinetics, and behavior tests on APP/
PSI mice are currently in progress.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Ministry of Science and Technol-
ogy (MOST) and Ministry of Commerce, Industry and
Energy (MCIE) of Korea for financial support.
Changing –OMe at C-4 (II-11) to –OH (II-15) or –NH2
(II-10) significantly enhanced the inhibitory activity.
These results suggest that the presence of two electron
donating groups both at C-3 and C-4 positions probably
plays a critical role to display higher activity, and at
least one of them at C-3 or C-4 is necessary to be –
NH2, –NHMe, –NMe2 or OH.12 When R3 substituent
was replaced with NH2, NMe2 or N(CH2 CH2)2, inhib-
itory activity was decreased from 0.6, 1.0 to >20 lM (in
II-1, 3, and 9).
References and notes
1. Cutler, N. R.; Sramek, J. J. Progr. Neuro-Psychopharma-
col. Biol. Psychiatr. 2001, 25, 27.
2. Meyer-luemen, M. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6, 1.
3. Nussbaum, R. L.; Ellis, C. E. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 348,
1356.
4. Hardy, J.; Selkoe, D. J. Science 2002, 297, 353.
5. (a) Thorsett, E. D.; Latimer, L. H. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2000, 4, 377; (b) Vickers, J. C.; Dickson, T. C.; Adlard, P.
A.; Sounders, H. L.; King, C. E.; McCormack, G. Prog.
Neurobiol. 2000, 60, 139.
6. (a) Hammarstrom, P.; Wiseman, R. L.; Powers, E. T.;
Kelly, J. W. Science 2003, 299, 713; (b) Dominquez, D. I.;
De Strooper, B. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2002, 23, 324.
7. (a) Lashuel, H. A.; Petre, B. M.; Wall, J.; Simon, M.;
Nowak, R. J.; Walz, T.; Lansbury, P. T. J. Mol. Biol.
2002, 322, 1089; (b) Volles, M. J.; Lansbury, P. T.
Biochemistry 2003, 42, 7871.
8. Lee, K. H.; Shin, B. H.; Shin, K. J.; Kim, D. J.; Yu, J.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 328, 816.
9. Revine, H., III Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2002, 404, 106, In
vitro ThT assay: the final concentration of Ab 42
(Bachem) was 25 lM. The excitation and emission wave-
lengths were 450 and 482 nm with 10 nm slit (LS-55
luminescence spectrometer: Perkin-Elmer).
Selected nine compounds were initially screened at low
concentration of 1 lM for the compound cytotoxicity
and then at high concentration of 10 lM. In Figure 4,
II-2 (150%) showed a predominant relative cell viability
compared with control (100%) and curcumin (116%) at
10 lM. And HT-22 neuronal cells are mostly safe to the
other compounds at high dose.
In conclusion, most of the synthesized compounds in
this study inhibit Ab 42 fibril formation near sub-lM
range of IC50 and most of the compounds do not show
their own cytotoxicities on HT-22 neuronal cell even at
high concentration. In particular, I-7 and II-2 exhibited
the best combination of inhibitory activity and com-
pound cytotoxicity. Based on these results, they are
more potent Ab fibril formation inhibitors than
curcumin.
10. MTT assay: MTT(3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphe-
nyltetrazolium bromide) was added into the HT-22 cell.