Because of its novel structure and interesting mode of
action, we initiated a program aimed at the synthesis of
cruentaren A and analogues thereof. The synthetic scheme
must address the formation of the stereotetrad that extends
into the side chain.10 In addition, connection of the aryl part
with the aliphatic sector poses a certain challenge. Most
importantly, the propensity of cruentaren A to rearrange to
a less active six-membered lactone (cruentaren B) under
acidic or basic conditions has to be considered. A retrosyn-
thetic analysis is shown in Figure 1. Thus, the Z-configured
allylamine could be fashioned by a Wittig reaction or
reduction of a triple bond. As a key step for macrolactone
formation, a ring-closing alkyne metathesis (RCAM) fol-
lowed by Lindlar reduction was deemed appropriate.11 Of
course, classical macrolactonization strategies (Yamaguchi,
Mitsunobu) might also be considered.12 The stereocenters
at C9 and C10 could be derived from the product of an aldol
reaction. As a key step in the synthesis of a fragment of
type 3 containing the stereotetrad, a Marshall reaction was
envisioned to fashion the anti-configuration at C17/C18. In
this paper, we illustrate the synthesis of the core structure
of cruentaren A based on these key bond-forming reactions.
The synthesis of a benzoic acid building block corre-
sponding to structure 2 was started with 2,4-dimethoxyben-
zoic acid (4), which was allylated13 via the dianion followed
by esterification (Scheme 1). Degradation of the terminal
double bond to an aldehyde function was achieved by a
dihydroxylation/periodate cleavage sequence in good overall
yield.14 Aldehyde 6 was combined with pentynyloxazolidi-
none 7 via an Evans aldol reaction using the standard boron
enolate.15 Protection of the secondary hydroxyl function of
aldol product 8 as a triisopropylsilyl ether using TIPS triflate
and proton sponge as base16 followed by reductive cleavage
of the chiral auxiliary produced the primary alcohol 10.
Conversion of the primary alcohol to the corresponding
methyl group was achieved by tosylation of the alcohol and
treatment of the intermediate tosylate 11 with zinc/sodium
iodide.17 After saponification of the methyl ester 12, the
obtained alkynoic acid 13 was converted to the dianion which
was alkylated at the acetylide using MeI. This way, the acid
14 containing an internal alkyne required for the alkyne
metathesis could be obtained in a concise manner.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Functionalized Benzoic Acid 14
propargylic mesylate (S)-17 came to use. This transformation
to alkyne 18 proceeded with excellent diastereoselectivity
(22:1) and good chemical yield (Scheme 2). After silyl
protection of the hydroxyl function, the triple bond of 19
was hydroborated with Cy2BH. The vinylborane intermediate
was in situ oxidized to aldehyde 20.21 Reduction of the
aldehyde gave primary alcohol 21, which was protected using
3,4-dimethoxybenzyltrichloroacetimidate leading to ether 22
in excellent yield.22 Cleavage of the acetonide moiety under
mild conditions (CuCl2‚2H2O, acetonitrile, -5 °C) afforded
diol 23.23 Other attempts to cleave the acetal of 22 (AcOH
in THF at 50 °C, TFA in CH2Cl2, FeCl3/SiO2 in CHCl3) were
As a key step for creation of the stereotetrad of fragment
3, a Marshall reaction18,19 of the known aldehyde20 16 with
(8) D’Ambrosio, M.; Guerriero, A.; Debitus, C.; Pietra, F. HelV. Chim.
Acta 1996, 79, 51-60.
(9) (a) Jansen, R.; Kunze, B.; Reichenbach, H.; Ho¨fle, G. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 917-921. (b) Kunze, B.; Jansen, R.; Ho¨fle, G.; Reichenbach,
H. J. Antibiot. 2004, 57, 151-155.
(17) Fujimoto, Y.; Tatsuno, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 17, 3325-3326.
(18) (a) Marshall, J. A.; Schaaf, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7825-
7831. (b) Marshall, J. A.; Yanik, M. M.; Adams, N. D.; Ellis, K. C.;
Chobanian, H. R. Org. Synth. 2005, 81, 157-170.
(19) Prusov, E.; Ro¨hm, H.; Maier, M. E. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1025-
1028.
(20) Arai, N.; Chikaraishi, N.; Omura, S.; Kuwajima, I. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 2845-2848.
(21) Marshall, J. A.; Schaaf, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7428-
7432.
(22) (a) Horita, K.; Yoshioka, T.; Tanaka, T.; Oikawa, Y.; Yonemitsu,
O. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 3021-3028. (b) Dahan, A.; Portnoy, M. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 6480-6482. (c) Wang, C.; Forsyth, C. J. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 2997-3000.
(23) Liu, Z.-Y.; Chen, Z.-C.; Yu, C.-Z.; Wang, R.-F.; Zhang, R.-Z.;
Huang, C.-S.; Yan, Z.; Cao, D.-R.; Sun, J.-B.; Li, G. Chem. Eur. J. 2002,
8, 3747-3756.
(10) Koskinen, A. M. P.; Karisalmi, K. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2005, 34, 677-
690.
(11) For a review, see: Fu¨rstner, A.; Davies, P. W. Chem. Commun.
2005, 2307-2320.
(12) Parenty, A.; Moreau, X.; Campagne, J. M. Chem. ReV. 2006, 106,
911-939.
(13) Yang, K.; Blackman, B.; Diederich, W.; Flaherty, P. T.; Mossman,
C. J.; Roy, S.; Ahn, Y. M.; Georg, G. I. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 10030-
10039.
(14) For a recent example, see: Jiang, X.; Fortanet, J. G.; Brabander, J.
K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11254-11255.
(15) (a) Gage, J. R.; Evans, D. A. Org. Synth. 1989, 68, 83-91. (b)
Arya, P.; Qin, H. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 917-947.
(16) Other bases, such as 2,6-lutidine or i-Pr2NEt, gave inferior yields.
656
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 4, 2007