selectivity (Table 1, entry 12). These results strongly sug-
gest the importance of the H-bond in the intermediate B. It
has been reported that the H-bonded conformation of
a biradical is the key to stereoselectivity in the Norrish-
Type II reaction of β-methoxy ketones.19 Moreover, as the
combination of an ion pair and a H-bond has been
postulated in the several catalytic reactions using ionic
liquids20 and in the ammonium betaine catalysis in
Mannich reactions,21 the ion pair of the ammonium cation
and the anion may contribute to the stabilization of the
intermediate B.
Although there have been several examples of the use of
organic cations as a template for organic synthesis, such as
formation of hosts,22 catenane syntheses,23 and macrocyc-
lic RCM reactions,24 to the best of our knowledge, there
has been little work on their application to stereoselective
reactions.
In summary, we have reported that TBAXs serve as
templates for diastereoselective NorrishꢀYang cycliza-
tions. The dual interactions between an ammonium with
a benzene ring and a carbonyl group significantly changed
the conformation of the substrate. The counteranions also
have a significant effect on the stereoselectivity. The
weakly basic anions are speculated to stabilize the inter-
mediary biradical by forming a H-bond with the hydroxy
group of the intermediate, the cyclization of which leads to
trans-dihydrobenzofuranols in high stereoselectivities. As
TBAXs are common reagents, they would be useful for
various template-controlled organic syntheses.
Scheme 2. Postulated Reaction Mechanism for
TBAX-Templated NorrishꢀYang Cyclization
The stabilization energy of the complex shown in
Figure 1b was calculated for that orientation to be ꢀ15.3
kcal/mol. The electrostatic (ꢀ10.6 kcal/mol) and induction
(ꢀ4.3 kcal/mol) components are mainly responsible for
the strong attraction. The significant contribution of the
electrostatic and induction components toward the stabi-
lization energy suggests that these interactions can be
categorized as cationꢀπ interactions.17
Taken together, the above results led us to conclude that
the mechanism for the stereoselective NorrishꢀYang cy-
clization of 2-benzyloxyacylbenzenes is as shown in
Scheme 2. As predicted by the calculations, the substrate
forms a complex A with Bu4Nþ through dual interac-
tions at the aromatic ring and the carbonyl group.
The abstraction of the benzyl hydrogen by an excited
carbonyl group produces a biradical and a hydroxy group
as shown in B. Ring closure of the biradical would thus
produce trans-dihydrobenzofuranol 3 or 5. Although the
role of the counteranions toward the stereoselectivity still
remains unclear, the H-bond acceptor ability seems to be
animportant factor. Thehalideandacetate ionscan forma
H-bond with the hydroxy group of the intermediate B,
which would contribute to the stabilization of the con-
formation of B. The order of the basicity of the anions are
AcOꢀ > Fꢀ > Clꢀ > Brꢀ, whichcorrespondsclosely with
the order of their stereoselectivities (Table 1, entries 7, 10,
11, and 13, and entries 22ꢀ2ꢀ5). On the other hand, the
noncoordinating anions, PF6 and BF4ꢀ, are much less
effective (Table 1, entries 14 and 15). The observation that
a solvent containing 10% water significantly decreased the
selectivity supports the contribution of the H-bond to the
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas
‘Advanced Molecular Transformations by Organocata-
lysts’ from MEXT (24105508).
Supporting Information Available. Experimental and
computational details, characterization data, and 1H and
13C NMR spectra of new compounds. This material
is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
(22) (a) Li, J.; Nowak, P.; Otto, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9222–
9239. (b) Otto, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 2200–2210.
(23) (a) Niu, Z.; Gibson, H. W. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 6024–6046. (b)
Stoddart, J. F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1802–1820.
(24) Bolduc, P.; Jacques, A.; Collins, S. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 12790–12791.
(19) Moorthy, J. N.; Samanta, S.; Koner, A. L.; Saha, S.; Nau, W. M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13608–13617.
(20) (a) Chakraborti, A. K.; Roy, S. R.; Kumar, D.; Chopra, P. Green
Chem. 2008, 10, 1111–1118. (b) Chakraborti, A. K.; Roy, S. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6902–6903.
(21) Uraguchi, D.; Koshimoto, K.; Ooi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 10878–10879.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 23, 2013
5997