1524 Organometallics, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2007
Moret and Chen
a literature procedure.13 All the other chemicals were obtained
commercially and used as received unless otherwise stated.
Complex Syntheses. [(N-N)Pt(CH3)(TFE)]+[BF4]-, ∼5 mM
Solution. One droplet of HBF4‚Et2O was added to a suspension of
(N-N)Pt(CH3)2 (6 mg, 10 µmol) in TFE, resulting in complete
dissolution and a color change from violet to orange, and the
mixture was stirred for 10 min. The solution was used without
further purification for electrospraying 1a.
(presumably elemental Pt) was removed by filtration, and 12 mL
of hexane was slowly added at 0 °C. The solution was left at
-20 °C overnight. Subsequent filtration and washing of the solid
with hexane (2 × 2 mL), followed by a second crystallization from
CH2Cl2/hexane, afforded the product as black microcrystals (92 mg,
37%). On some occasions, separation of the complex from the free
ligand by crystallization was not successful, and the product was
purified by column chromatography over dry, degassed neutral
alumina (30 g) with 1:1 hexane/Et2O as eluant, resulting in pure
product but lower yield (43 mg, 17%). The solid product can be
handled for short periods under air, but should be stored at 4 °C
under an inert atmosphere. Its solutions decompose over several
hours when exposed to air or at room temperature, yielding a black
[(N-N)Pt(C6H5)(TFE)]+[BF4]-, ∼4 mM Solution. Benzene
(0.5 mL, 0.44 g, 5.6 mmol) was added to 2 mL of a ∼5 × 10-3
M
solution of [(N-N)Pt(CH3)(TFE)]+[BF4]- and stirred for 2 h. The
solution was used without further purification for electrospraying
2a and 2b.
[(N-N)Pt(C2H5)(TFE)]+[BF4]-, ∼5 mM Solution. One droplet
of HBF4‚Et2O was added to a suspension of (N-N)Pt(C2H5)2 (7; 6
mg, 10 µmol) in TFE, resulting in complete dissolution and a color
change from violet to orange, and the mixture was stirred for 10
min. The solution was used without further purification for
electrospraying 3a and 4.
1
precipitate (presumably elemental Pt). Mp: g137 °C (dec). H
3
NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 7.55 (d, J(H-H) ) 8 Hz, 4H, ArHm), δ 7.27
(t, 3J(H-H) ) 8 Hz, 2H, ArHp), δ 1.89 (q, 3J(H-H) ) 8 Hz, 2J(195
-
Pt-H) ) 96 Hz, 4H, PtCH2CH3), δ 1.063 (s, 6H, NC(CH3)C), δ
3
4
0.61 (t, J(H-H) ) 8 Hz, J(195Pt-H) ) 84 Hz, 6H, PtCH2CH3).
13C NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 172.9 (CdN), δ 143.4 (Cipso), δ 128.7
(Cmeta), 127.8 (Cpara), 127.6 (Cortho), δ 21.5 (PtCH2CH3), δ 17.5
(NC(CH3)C(CH3)N), δ 0.8 (PtCH2CH3), no J(Pt-C) observed.
Anal. Calcd for C20H22N2Cl4Pt: C, 38.29, H, 3.53, N, 4,47.
Found: C, 38.34, H, 3.82, N, 4.62.
cis/trans-PtCl2(SMe2)2. (This reaction does not require an inert
atmosphere.) To a solution of H2PtCl6‚xH2O (10.8 g, 22 mmol) in
50 mL of water was added solid N2H4‚2HCl (1.16 g, 11 mmol) in
small amounts. The flask containing the dark red solution was then
placed in a 100 °C bath until no more gas evolution was observed
(0.5 h). After cooling to room temperature, a small amount of
platinum black was filtered off, 12 mL (0.16 mol) of dimethyl
sulfide was added, and the pink suspension was heated to 80 °C
until it had completely turned yellow. After cooling, it was extracted
with dichloromethane (3 × 50 mL) and the combined organic
phases were dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Evaporation
of the solvent under reduced pressure yielded the product as a
yellow crystalline solid (8.40 g, 97%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300
[(N-N)Pt(C2H5)(CD3CN)]+[BF4]- Solution. A 50 µL sample
of a dilution of HBF4 (50% in water, 19 µL, 0.3 mmol) in TFE-d3
(1 g) was added to a suspension of 7 (6.3 mg, 10 µmol) in TFE-d3
(1 g), resulting in complete dissolution and a color change from
violet to orange. The mixture was stirred for 10 min, and 50 µL of
CD3CN was added. 1H NMR: δ 7.59-7.65 (m,4H, ArHm), δ 7.36-
7.45 (m, 2H, ArHp), δ 2.07 (s, 3H, NC(CH3)C), δ 1.96 (s, 3H,
3
2
NC(CH3)C, other side), δ 1.37 (q, J(H-H) ) 7.5 Hz, J(195Pt-
H) ) 85 Hz, 2H, PtCH2CH3), δ 0.51 (t, 3J(H-H) ) 7.5 Hz, 4J(195
Pt-H) ) 36 Hz, 3H, PtCH2CH3).
-
MHz): δ 2.58 (s, 3J(195Pt-H) ) 49 Hz, SMe2(cis)), δ 2.47 (s, 3J(195
Pt-H) ) 42 Hz, SMe2(trans)), cis/trans ratio 1:2.
-
Mass Spectrometry. Mass spectrometric measurements were
performed on a TSQ 700 instrument, modified as previously
described.12 The complexes 1a-3a and 2b were electrosprayed from
(1-2) × 10-5 M solutions in TFE and 1:4 mixtures of TFE and
H2O or pure H2O respectively.
Pt2(C2H5)4(µ-Me2S)2 (5). A 6.3 mL amount of a 0.46 M solution
of ethyllithium in 9:1 benzene/cyclohexane (2.90 mmol) was added
to a suspension of finely powdered [PtCl2(Me2S)2] (500 mg, 1.37
mmol) in diethyl ether (20 mL) at -15 °C (ice/salt mixture). The
mixture was stirred for 40 min, during which time the yellow solid
disappeared, the liquid phase became dark brown, and a white solid
(presumably LiCl) appeared. (All workup was performed at 0 °C
under argon.) The reaction was quenched with a N2-flushed, cooled
(0 °C) dilution of 1 mL of saturated NH4Cl in 20 mL of water. A
dark solid was filtered off, then the phases were separated, and the
aqueous phase was extracted with 3 × 10 mL of diethyl ether. The
combined organic phases were dried over MgSO4, activated
charcoal (ca. 0.2 g) was added, and the black mixture was filtered
to give a pale yellow solution, which was generally concentrated
to about 20 mL and used without further purification. (Evaporation
of the solvent in Vacuo at 0 °C yielded a tan solid that started turning
brown as it was becoming dry, as well as when it was allowed to
warm to room temperature.) The yield could be estimated from
the integrals of the 1H NMR spectrum of a sample taken from the
subsequent ligand exchange reaction to 0.20 mmol (29%). 1H NMR
Energy-resolved reactive cross-section measurements were ex-
ecuted as reported earlier.12 The ions were thermalized in the first
24-pole region to a temperature of 343 K using argon or a suitable
reaction gas (3-10 mTorr) and then mass selected by the first
quadrupole. They were then reacted with argon in the octopole
collision cell while monitoring the products as a function of collision
energy. Argon was chosen as reaction gas because it allows working
at higher energies in the lab frame in order to move the CID
threshold region away from the region where the ion beam is
truncated.
The “daughter” mode was used for mass selection, and a
retarding potential measurement of the kinetic energy distribution
of the ions was performed before each experiment, yielding roughly
Gaussian distributions with a fwhm between 1.5 and 2.1 eV in the
laboratory frame. The parent and daughter channels were monitored
alternately while the collision offset was scanned. Additionally, for
each measurement, a normal mass scan was performed with a fixed
collision offset to check the gross reaction chemistry and ensure
that no unexpected products appeared. The intensities of the two
channels were scaled so that their ratio matched the ratio of integrals
observed on the corresponding mass scan, and the cross sections
were calculated as described by Ervin et al.14 with a measured
effective path length of 23 ( 5 cm.
3
(C6D6): δ 2.10 (s, J(195Pt-H) ) 17 Hz, 12H, SCH3), δ 1.62 (q,
2
3J(H-H) ) 8 Hz, J(195Pt-H) ) 93 Hz, 8H, PtCH2CH3), δ 1.38
3
4
(t, J(H-H) ) 8 Hz, J(195Pt-H) ) 93 Hz, 12H, PtCH2CH3).
(N-N)Pt(C2H5)2 ((N-N) ) ArNC(Me)C(Me)N)Ar, Ar ) 2,6-
dichlorophenyl) (7). A 225 mg (0.60 mmol) amount of ArNC-
(Me)C(Me)N)Ar (Ar ) 2,6-dichlorophenyl) (6) was added to a
solution of 0.20 mmol of 5 in 20 mL of ether at 0 °C. The yellow
solution was allowed to warm at room temperature and stirred for
4.5 h. (The workup was effected under an argon atmosphere.) The
solvent was removed in Vacuo, the dark green residue was dissolved
in 4 mL of dichloromethane at 0 °C, a small amount of black solid
Extraction of the activation energy for ligand dissociation was
done with Armentrout’s CRUNCH program. For the computation
of the RRKM rate constant needed for the kinetic shift, frequencies
(13) Hill, G. S.; Irwin, M. J.; Levy, C. J.; Rendina, L. M.; Puddephatt,
R. J. Inorg. Synth. 1998, 32, 149.
(14) Ervin, K. M.; Armentrout, P. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 83, 166.