in situ and alkenes with inverse electron demand.4-7 Un-
activated alkenes gave generally poor yields, and although
electron-rich alkenes such as silyl enol ethers reacted more
efficiently, the reaction could not be applied to our system
because the regioselectivity would be reversed and the
tertiary alcohol could not be installed properly. Furthermore,
the enantioselective hetero Diels-Alder reaction of vinyl-
nitroso compounds was not reported, and we wanted to syn-
thesize trichodermamides enantioselectively. Only recently,
the Zakarian group developed a novel strategy to construct
the oxazine ring by a 1,2-oxaza-Cope rearrangement.8 Here
we report our synthetic approach toward the enantioselective
construction of the oxazine ring, which will be further
manipulated to afford trichodermamides A and B.
stereoselectively by the directed epoxidation controlled either
by the tertiary hydroxyl group or by the secondary hydroxyl
group, and the R-functionality would be introduced by the
oxidation of the enolate of compound III. We found that
(-)-quinic acid was an appropriate starting material because
it provided a tertiary hydroxyl functional group with the
desired stereochemistry and a secondary hydroxyl group
which could be further functionalized to the epoxide ring.
In addition, it also had a diol moiety that could be
manipulated by a Corey-Winter olefination.
As shown in Scheme 1, (-)-quinic acid was converted to
the corresponding lactone acetonide, followed by the lactone
Intrigued by the report of an intramolecular epoxide ring-
opening reaction by oximes,9 we envisioned the installation
of the oxazine ring and the secondary alcohol with the desired
stereochemistry by the stereoselective formation of the
epoxide. As shown in Figure 2, we planned to introduce the
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the R-Functionalized Spiroketone
ring-opening reaction to give the ester, and then protection
of the liberated secondary alcohol with TBDPS-Cl afforded
1 in an overall yield of 80% in three steps. Ester 1 was
reduced to the corresponding alcohol using NaBH4/LiCl. The
diol was converted to epoxide 2 in two steps in good overall
yield. The epoxide was then opened in 95% yield using
acetonitrile as the nucleophile and LDA as the base to give
the side chain elongation product 3.12 After treatment with
NaOMe in MeOH, followed by neutralization with acetic
acid, nitrile 3 was converted to the spirolactone 4 in 80%
yield13 (97% yield based on the recovery of starting material).
Conversion of the nitrile to an ester and protection of the
tertiary alcohol were realized in one step. Treatment of 4
with TBAF gave the free alcohol that was converted to a
mesylate. Elimination of the mesylate group under micro-
wave conditions gave the desired product 5 in an overall
70% yield. However, introduction of the azide at the
R-position of lactone 5 could not be accomplished.
Figure 2. Retrosynthetic analysis of the oxazine-containing moiety.
double bond at a later stage by a Corey-Winter olefination,10
and the hydroxyl group at the C5 position could be installed
by allylic oxidation. The key intermediate I would be
synthesized by the epoxide ring-opening reaction. The oxime
could be introduced either by the oxidation of R-amino ester
IIa11 or by the traditional reaction between hydroxylamine
and R-keto ester IIb. The epoxide moiety would be obtained
Evans’ azidation14 failed under all conditions tried. Other
azidation conditions also failed. Bromination only gave a
trace amount of R-bromo lactone. Finally, treatment of
compound 5 with 3 equiv of KHMDS to form the corre-
(4) Gilchrist, T. L.; Lingham, D. A.; Roberts, T. G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1979, 1089.
(5) Gilchrist, T. L.; Roberts, T. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1983,
1283.
(6) Gilchrist, T. L.; Stretch, W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1987,
2235.
(7) Gilchrist, T. L.; Lemos, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1993,
1391.
(8) Zakarian, A.; Lu, C.-D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5356.
(9) Al-Qawasmeh, R. A.; Al-Tel, T. H.; Abdel-Jalil, R. J.; Voelter, W.
Chem. Lett. 1999, 541.
(11) Boehlow, T. R.; Harburn, J. J.; Spilling, C. D. J. Org. Chem. 2001,
66, 3111.
(12) Takagi, Y. T. I. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1993, 66, 2949.
(13) Kim, Y. J.; Kido, M.; Bando, M.; Kitahara, T. Tetrahedron 1997,
53, 7501.
(14) Evans, D. A.; Britton, T. C.; Ellman, J. A.; Dorrow, R. L. J. Org.
Chem. 1990, 112, 4011.
(10) Chiara, J. L.; Valle, N. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 1895.
978
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 6, 2007