1718 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2007, Vol. 50, No. 7
Brief Articles
through a Celite pad, and the filtrate was evaporated to dryness to
afford the amine 12. This amine, without further purification, was
dissolved in anhydrous toluene (30 mL). Glacial acetic acid (9
mmol) was added, and the resulting solution was refluxed for 1 h.
The solvent was vacuum-evaporated, and the residue was dissolved
in CH2Cl2, washed with 10% Na2CO3 solution, and dried (Na2SO4),
and the solvent was evaporated to dryness. Flash chromatography
on silica gel using a mixture of 10:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH provided 13
in 81-82% yield.
Synthesis of Target Compounds 16. The amines 15 were first
prepared by a procedure analogous to that of 12. Without further
purification each amine was suspended in triethyl orthoformate (4
mL). Hydrochloric acid 36% (3 drops) was added, and the resulting
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The mixture was
then made alkaline with a 10% NaHCO3 solution and extracted
with CH2Cl2 (3 × 40 mL). The combined organic extracts were
washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated to dryness,
and the residue was recrystallized from diethyl ether to afford pure
16 in 80-81% yield.
Synthesis of Target Compounds 22. A solution of methane-
sulfonyl chloride (121 µL, 1.55 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added
dropwise at 0 °C to a suspension of 18 (500 mg, 1.412 mmol) in
dry pyridine (6 mL), and the mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 10 min. The mixture was poured into ice/water
and acidified with hydrochloric acid 9%, and the resulting solid
was filtered, washed with water, and air-dried to give the mesylate
19 (550 mg, 90%). Compound 19 was then converted into the
analogue 21 in 84% yield by a procedure analogous to the one
described for 13. Compound 21 (0.26 mmol) was then added to a
33% solution of the suitable dialkylamine in ethanol (4 mL), and
the resulting solution was heated at reflux for 4 h. The solvent was
vacuum-evaporated, and the residue was purified by column
chromatography (silica gel, 8:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH) to furnish 22 in
90-92% yield.
Synthesis of Target Compounds 27. HCl (9%, 1 mL) was added
to a stirred solution of the acetamide 18 (1.13 mmol) in dioxane
(15 mL), and the resulting mixture was heated at reflux for 3 h.
The solvent was vacuum-evaporated, the aqueous layer was
extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 70 mL), and the organic extracts were
dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated to dryness. The resulting solid
was recrystallized from ethanol to give 23 (94%), which was
converted to the corresponding mesylate 24 in 96% yield according
to the procedure described for the preparation of the analogue 19.
The mesylate 24 was then converted to 26 in 83% yield through
initial hydrogenation followed by treatement with triethyl ortho-
formate, as described for the preparation of 16. The mesylate 26
(0.32 mmol) was refluxed for 5 h with an ethanolic solution of the
appropriate dialkylamine (4 mL), the solvent was vacuum-
evaporated, and the residue was purified by column chromatography
(silica gel, 9:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH) to furnish 27 in 83-91% yield.
Figure 2. Effects of new amino derivatives on human breast cancer
cells. The MDA-MB-231 cell line was incubated in serum-containing
medium for 72 h in the presence of increasing concentrations of
aminoderivatives. Cell proliferation was determined by measuring the
absorbance at 450 nm (WST-1 method). Data are representative of three
individual experiments, performed in three replicates. Control values
did not exhibit significant changes compared to the dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO) vehicle. Asterisks indicate the statistically significant changes
of treated cells compared to control at the level of 0.01.
Compounds 16a,b showed significant inhibitory effect on cell
growth only at the highest concentration tested (100 µM). At
this concentration a large number of cells lost contact with the
culture flask and the remaining adherent cells underwent
morphological changes suggestive of apoptosis. The insertion
of a 2-methyl group in compounds 16a,b, providing the
analogues 13a,b, did not alter the observed effect.
The effects of the pyrazole-fused derivatives 22a,b and 27a,b
on cell growth are shown in Figure 2. A dose-dependent
inhibitory effect on cell growth was observed. It is worth
noticing that for concentrations up to 30 µM the breast cancer
cells do not present any morphological changes, suggesting a
cytostatic rather than a cytotoxic effect. The obtained results
indicate that the incorporation of a pyrazole ring fusion into
16a resulting in compound 27a significantly increased the
antiproliferative activity. The later effect was profound even
from 1 µM (Figure 2). The IC50 for 27a was 6.5 µM. The
insertion of a 9-methyl group in 27a resulting in 22a did not
improve the growth inhibitory effect of 27a and gave an IC50
of 17 µM. It is plausible to suggest that the higher inhibitory
effect of 27a compared to 22a may due to the enhanced
imidazole tautomerism of 27a.
The pyrazole-fused analogue 27b showed a significant
antiproliferative activity. However, a higher IC50 (8.5 µM)
compared to that for 27a was obtained. Similar with 22a, the
9-methyl analogue 22b did not improve the antiproliferative
activity of 27b (IC50 ) 18 µM).
Previous studies concerning the antiproliferative activity of
the structurally related pyranobenzopyranoindazoles8 (II, Figure
1) on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells had shown that they
possess IC50 in the range 9-50 µM. The replacement of the
pyran moiety of those derivatives by an imidazole ring resulted
only in a slight improvement of their activity. However, the
involvement of the imidazole tautomerism in the biological
activity of the compounds could suggest that this novel scaffold
may constitute a new lead for the development of antiprolif-
erative agents.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures
and characterization data for the new compounds, cell culture
conditions, details for cell proliferation assays, and elemental
analysis results. This material is available free of charge via the
References
(1) (a) Denny, W. A.; Wakelin, L. P. G. Kinetics of the binding of
mitoxantrone, ametantrone and analogs to DNA. Relationship with
binding mode and antitumor activity. Anti-Cancer Drug Des. 1990,
5, 189-200. (b) Baguley, B. C.; Wakelin, L. P.; Jacintho, J. D.;
Kovacic, P. Mechanisms of action of DNA intercalating acridine-
based drugs: How important are contributions from electron transfer
and oxidative stress? Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 2643-2649. (c)
Krapcho, A. P.; Menta, E.; Oliva, A.; Di Domenico, R.; Fiocchi, L.;
Maresch, M. E.; Gallagher, C. E.; Hacker, M. P.; Beggiolin, G.;
Giuliani, F. C.; Pezzoni, G.; Spinelli, S. Synthesis and antitumor
evaluation of 2,5-disubstituted-indazolo[4,3-gh]isoquinolin-6(2H)-
ones (9-aza-anthrapyrazoles). J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 5429-5444.
Experimental Section
Synthesis of Target Compounds 13. A solution of the nitro-
derivative 11 (0.9 mmol) in absolute ethanol (40 mL) was
hydrogenated in the presence of 10% Pd/C (30 mg) under a pressure
of 50 psi at room temperature for 4 h. The mixture was then filtered