1144 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 6, 2001
Lin and Farmer
freeze-pump-thaw method. Purified nitric oxide was transferred into
the flask, and the solution was stirred vigorously overnight before
evaporation under vacuum. The resulting solid was washed with
degassed methanol several times.
(ii) Hydroxylamine Reduction.29 Fe(TPP)Cl was dissolved in
toluene in a round-bottom flask and degassed. After hydroxylamine
hydrochloride was dissolved in methanol, sodium methoxide in
methanol was added. The white precipitate formed was discarded after
the product solution was passed through the filter paper. The resulting
solution was added to the Fe(TPP)Cl solution and stirred overnight. A
large portion of methanol was added to precipitate the red-brown solid.
This solid was washed with methanol several times and dried under
vacuum.
and a metal nitrite. Several mechanisms have been suggested,
such as O atom transfer from a coordinated N2O2 to a second
metal nitrosyl.5,8 In a series of papers, Ford and co-workers
studied the NO disproportionation reaction catalyzed by Ru-
(TPP).25 Kinetic evidence identified an intermediate, suggested
as a dinitrosyl adduct, which subsequently reacted with two
additional NO molecules to yield a nitrosyl/nitrito adduct and
N2O. Unexpectedly, recent reports from the same laboratory
suggest that Fe(TPP) does not undergo the same reaction, but
does form a trans-dinitrosyl species at low temperature.26,27 In
our hands, the disproportionation reaction proceeds as previously
reported by Yoshimura and others.9,10
(iii) Zinc Amalgam Reduction.3 Fe(TPP)Cl was dissolved in toluene
and extensively degassed by the freeze-pump-thaw method. The
toluene used was commercial grade and not dried. After addition of
zinc amalgam powder, the solution was frozen in liquid nitrogen and
evacuated. Nitric oxide was introduced via a vacuum adapter. The
solution was then warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight.
The powder was filtered anaerobically, and the resulting solution could
be used directly or evaporated under vacuum and redissolved in dry
solvents if necessary.
15NO-Fe(TPP) was made from Fe(TPP)Cl and sodium nitrite-15N in
the presence of PPh3.30 Fe(TPP)Cl (79.3 mg, 0.11 mmol) and PPh3
(29.2 mg, 0.11 mmol) were dissolved in chloroform (5 mL). Sodium
nitrite-15N (11.4 mg, 0.16 mmol) in methanol (5 mL) was added, and
the solution was stirred overnight. After removal of the solvent, the
red-brown solid was redissolved in chloroform and passed down a
neutral alumina column (Fisher, grade I).
Reaction of NO-Fe(TPP) with NO. In a typical kinetic run, a 3-mL
sample of 0.1 mM NO-Fe(TPP) in toluene or chloroform was placed
in a homemade airtight quartz cuvette with a vacuum stopcock. After
the cell was evacuated, nitric oxide was introduced via a vacuum line,
and the pressure was measured with a mercury manometer. The cell
was pressurized with nitrogen, and the reaction was followed by the
UV-vis spectra.
A series of experiments were run in the presence of PPh3 and
monitored by 31P NMR of the reaction mix in NMR tubes with Schlenk
adapters. The amount of OPPh3 produced was calculated from the
integrals for PPh3 (-3 ppm) and OPPh3 (30 ppm).
In this report we give evidence of an N-N-coupled inter-
mediate, generated from reaction of NO-Fe(TPP) with NO, that
is capable of O atom transfer reactions which are uncoupled
from nitrite formation. This reactivity is demonstrated in
catalytic production of N2O in the presence of suitable O atom
acceptors. Isotopic labeling experiments under catalytic condi-
tions were undertaken to probe the nature of the O atom transfer
reaction, and rapid infrared spectroscopic studies are used to
characterize a possible N-N-coupled intermediate.
Experimental Section
Abbreviations. TPP, 5,10,15,20-Tetraphenyl-21H,23H-porphine; Fe-
(TPP)Cl, 5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl-21H,23H-porphine iron(III) chloride;
NO-Fe(TPP), nitrosyl iron tetraphenyl porphine; PPh3, triphenyl phos-
phine; OPPh3, triphenyl phosphine oxide.
General Procedures. All experiments were conducted under strict
anaerobic conditions by using standard Schlenk techniques. Toluene
was distilled from calcium oxide and degassed by freeze-pump-thaw
methods. Fe(TPP)Cl was purchased from Porphyrin Products. PPh3 and
OPPh3 were obtained from Aldrich. Sodium nitrite-15N was purchased
from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. Nitric oxide obtained from Air
Gas was used for most experiments, but further purification was
necessary. To trap out NOx impurities, the gas was bubbled through a
1 M NaOH solution; to trap out N2O and H2O contaminants in the NO
reactant gas, the gas was passed through a U-tube immersed in acetone/
dry ice or liquid N2 before being exposed to the reaction mix. Trace
amounts of N2O remained and were measured at the start of each
experiment quantifying N2O production. [15N]Nitric oxide was generated
from L-ascorbic acid and sodium nitrite-15N and purified by the same
procedure. All other chemicals were reagent grade and used without
further purification.
To correlate the formation of N2O with changes in the solution-
based Fe species, the solution-phase UV-vis spectra and the gas-phase
IR spectra of the headgas were measured concurrently as the reaction
proceeded. A special apparatus was used, consisting of a quartz UV-
vis cell connected via a Schlenk adapter to an airtight CaF2 IR cell;
the details of this hybrid cell have been described in the literature.23
The absorbance spectra of solutions of NO-Fe(TPP) were unchanged
after several weeks of storage in this cell. The relative increase in
concentration of N2O in the headgas during a reaction was determined
The electronic spectra were recorded on a Hewlett-Packard 8453
spectrophotometer. Infrared spectra quantifying gaseous N2O production
were measured on a Nicolet 410 Impact spectrophotometer; solid-state
spectra were obtained with a ReactIR (Applied System) surface probe,
as will be described. The head gas samples from isotopic labeling
experiments were separated with a PLOT GC column (fused silica 50
m × 0.32 mm, Al2O3, KCl coating) and analyzed by a Micromass
Autospec mass spectrometer. Data were acquired in EI mode, and
fragmentation was reported as the percentage of N2O (44) peak.
The reaction of NO-Fe(TPP) with NO is inhibited by solvent
contamination (e.g., water, methanol) in the starting material or reactant
gas, and care was taken in the purification and thorough drying of the
complexes. Several methods were used to synthesize the starting NO-
Fe(TPP):
by integrating the IR absorbance from 2120 to 2280 cm-1 31
.
IR Characterization of Reaction Intermediates. An in situ two-
reflection ATR probe was used to obtain sequential IR spectra of solid
NO-Fe(TPP) films exposed to NO gas. A homemade glass adapter with
a rubber O-ring screw top, two gas inlets, and one septum can be fit
on the probe to form a small gastight chamber. The chamber was
evacuated for 10 min before each set of experiments and pressurized
with pure nitrogen gas. A 20-µL solution of NO-Fe(TPP) in toluene or
THF was transferred to the probe surface (diamond or silicon) via a
gastight syringe. A stream of nitrogen was passed over the probe until
the NO-Fe(TPP) solution dried to a film.
(i) Reductive Nitrosylation.28 Fe(TPP)Cl was dissolved in toluene
(20% v/v methanol) in a round-bottom flask and degassed by the
Traces of protic solvents affected the obtained spectra and inhibited
further reactivity of the NO-Fe(TPP). These observations were verified
by use of wet solvents during the deposition. To remove trace water in
solution, after evaporation of a thin Fe(TPP)(NO) film on the IR probe,
(24) (a) Shiro, Y.; Fujii, M.; Iizuka, T.; Adachi, S. I.; Tsukamoto, K.;
Nakahara, K.; Shoun, H. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 1617. (b) Obayashi, E.;
Takahashi, S.; Shiro, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12964-12965.
(25) (a) Lorkovic, I. M.; Miranda, K. M.; Lee, B.; Bernhard, S.;
Schoonover, J. R.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11674-11683.
(b) Lorkovic, I. M.; Ford, P. C. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1225-1226. (c)
Lorkovic, I. M.; Ford, P. C. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 1467-1473.
(26) Lorkovic, I. M.; Ford, P. C. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 632-633.
(27) Lorkovic, I. M.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6516-
6517.
(28) (a) Spaulding, L. D.; Chang, C. C.; Yu, N.; Felton, R. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 2517-2525. (b) Wayland, B. B.; Olson, L. W. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 6037-6041.
(29) Choi, I. K.; Liu, Y. M.; Wei, Z. C.; Ryan, M. D. Inorg. Chem.
1997, 36, 3113-3118.
(30) Castro, C. E.; O’Shea, S. K. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1922-1923.
(31) Trogler, W. C. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1999, 187, 303-327.