Although Ir-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation is well
studied for unfunctionalized olefins and excellent results for
this reaction have been obtained, there have been very few
successful results with olefins bearing weakly coordinating
functional groups. This was noted in a recent review, which
stated that “more effort has been placed on ligand develop-
ment for iridium systems, than on investigations of substrate
scope”.9
Table 1. Ligand and Substrate Optimization Studiesa
Chiral phosphine-oxazole ligands developed in our
group10a,b have been employed in the Ir-catalyzed hydrogena-
tion of allylic alcohols and corresponding acetates, with ee
values up to 99%. Pfaltz et al. have reported the hydrogena-
tion of allylic esters8a using Ir-phosphinite-oxazoline and
Ir-diaminophosphine-oxazoline complexes. Knochel et
al.10c have demonstrated that amino acid derivatives can be
obtained in 96% ee from enamides. However, the substrate
scope of functionalized olefins has yet to be fully explored
and, to our knowledge, there are very few reports where enol
esters or enol ethers have been used as substrates for Ir-
catalyzed hydrogenations.11
a Conversions were determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy; ee values were
determined by chiral HPLC. b Acetophenone was the major product. c Ethyl
benzene was the major product.
Recently, we have reported on several novel classes of
chiral N,P ligands. Their Ir complexes (Figure 1, 1-4) have
Initially, we screened these four complexes (Figure 1, 1-4)
in the hydrogenation of enol esters and enol ethers to
establish reactivity and selectivity. Hydrogenation of enol
ethers 5a and 5b gave complicated mixtures with all catalysts
tried. Complex 4, which has previously given excellent
results with unfunctionalized olefins, was ineffective for all
enol esters in this study. Complex 3 showed some conversion
but the reactions were generally sluggish and resulted in
multiple products. Complex 2 proved to be more efficient
than 1 in terms of selectivity and reactivity.
When attempting the reduction of 5c with 2 we observed
a significant amount of ethyl benzene as byproduct, and the
alkyl acetate obtained was racemic. This observation may
be explained by the formation of Bro¨nsted acids during the
reaction, as recently reported by Matsuda et al.13 These
authors found that allylic alcohols behave as good leaving
groups in the presence of a catalytic amount of iridium
activated by H2; substitution with external nucleophiles can
then occur. They also noted that the replacement of the Ir
complex with CF3SO3H yielded identical results.
Hydrogenation of 5d also proceeded to completion, but
the hydrogenolysis of the phosphinate group occurred for
around 50% of the substrate. Interestingly, enantioselectivity
improved to 65% upon the replacement of the CdO group
with PdO.
Hydrogenation of enol diphenylphosphinate 5e with com-
plex 2 resulted in high ee (95%), full conversion, and no
detectable loss of phosphityl group. Asymmetric hydrogena-
tion of enol phosphonates and phosphinates was previously
observed using Rh-based catalyst, with moderate ee values.14
Hydrogenation of 5e with 0.5 mol % of catalyst 2 under
standard conditions but varying H2 pressures showed 30 bar
Figure 1. Iridium complexes used in hydrogenation studies.
been employed in asymmetric hydrogenation of aryl imines
(up to 92% ee),12 as well as of di- and trisubstituted
unfunctionalized olefins (up to 99% ee).10a,b In view of these
excellent results, we became interested in applying these
complexes to the hydrogenation of enol esters.
(8) (a) Pfaltz, A.; Blankenstein, J.; Hcrmann, E.; McIntyre, S.; Menges,
F.; Schcnleber, M.; Smit, S. P.; Wustenberg, B.; Zimmermann, N. AdV.
Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 33-43. (b) Ka¨llsto¨rm, K.; Munslow, I.; Andersson,
P. G. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 3194-3200.
(9) Cui, X.; Burgess, K. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 3272-3296.
(10) (a) Ka¨llsto¨rm, K.; Hedberg, C.; Brandt, P.; Bayer, A.; Andersson,
P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14308-14309. (b) Hedberg, C.;
Ka¨llsto¨rm, K.; Brandt, P.; Hansen, L. K.; Andersson, P. G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 2995-3001. (c) Bunlaksananusorn, T.; Polborn, K.;
Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3941-3943.
(11) (a) Goulioukina, N. S.; Dolgina, T. M.; Bondarenko, G. N.;
Beletskaya, I. P.; Ilyin, M. M.; Danakov, V. A.; Pfaltz, A. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2003, 14, 1397-1401. (b) Stefan, S.; Sebastian, P.; Pfaltz, A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5194-5197.
(12) (a) Trifonova, A.; Diesen, J. S.; Chapman, C. J.; Andersson, P. G.
Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3825-3827. (b) Trifonova, A.; Diesen, J. S.; Chapman,
C. J.; Andersson, P. G. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 2318-2328.
(13) Matsuda, I.; Wakamatsu, S.; Komori, K.; Makino, T.; Itoh, I.
Tettrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1043-1046.
1660
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 9, 2007