J. Patman et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 2540–2544
Table 4. Inhibition of rat NOS isozymes by di-substituted aminobenzothiazoles
2543
eNOS/nNOSb
iNOS/ nNOSc
a
a
a
Compound
nNOS IC50
(lM)
eNOS IC50
(lM)
iNOS IC50
(lM)
10b
11b
12b
15
0.05
0.8
3.4
9.1
25
44
36
26
NT
19
63
12
139
1
500
55
0.09
4.8
12.5
4.6
400
5
16
18
4.7
6.7
5.2
1.3
1
0.2
ND
3
NT, not tested.
ND, not determined.
a Inhibitory activity for rat NOS was measured by monitoring the conversion of [14C]-Arg to [14C]-Cit. For each compound, the percent inhibition
was determined in duplicate at 8–12 different concentrations.
b Selectivity against nNOS over eNOS is the ratio of eNOS IC50/nNOS IC50
.
c Selectivity against nNOS over iNOS is the ratio of iNOS IC50/nNOS IC50
.
acid 21 which is probably due to electrostatic repulsion.
Excellent selectivity for nNOS against iNOS was ob-
tained for compounds 18 and 20.
in rat models of disease states in which nNOS is thought
to play a role and will present the results in due course.
Since there are species differences among the NOS en-
zymes and we would like to evaluate our compounds
in rat models of disease states, a few compounds have
been tested for inhibitory activity in the rat NOS assays
(Table 4). In a similar fashion to the human enzymes,
inhibition was determined by measuring their effect on
the conversion by NOS of [3H]L-arginine into [3H]L-cit-
rulline. While there are differences between the rat and
human NOS enzymes, we were somewhat surprised by
the dramatic differences in nNOS activities and selectiv-
ities of some of the compounds. For example, com-
pound 10b (human nNOS IC50 = 1.3 lM vs rat nNOS
IC50 = 0.05 lM) and compound 12b (human nNOS
IC50 = 0.5 lM vs rat nNOS IC50 = 0.09 lM) showed
the largest differences in nNOS inhibitory activities be-
tween the two species. In the case of 10b, there was no
selectivity for the human nNOS over eNOS while there
was a 60-fold selectivity for the rat nNOS over eNOS.
Similarly, compound 12b was much more selective
(140-fold) for the rat nNOS over eNOS. In addition
compounds 10b and 12b showed excellent selectivity
(500-fold and 400-fold, respectively) for rat nNOS over
iNOS. It should be noted that while the inhibitory activ-
ities can vary by as much as 2 orders of magnitude for
nNOS (compound 10b) in the two species, such is not
the case for eNOS and iNOS inhibition. Interestingly,
18 showed a dramatic loss of nNOS potency but an in-
crease in its eNOS activity.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to NoAb BioDiscoveries Inc. (Mississa-
uga, ON, Canada) and Asinex Ltd (Moscow, Russia)
for performing the NOS inhibition assays. We thank
the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council (NSERC)
of Canada for Industrial Research Fellowships to two of
us (N.B. and J.R.).
References and notes
1. Nathan, C. J. Clin. Invest. 1997, 100, 2417.
2. Moncada, S.; Palmer, R. M.; Higgs, E. A. Pharmacol. Rev.
1991, 43, 109.
3. Kerwin, J. F., Jr.; Lancaster, J. R., Jr.; Feldman, P. L.
J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4343.
4. Moncada, S.; Higgs, E. A. FASEB J. 1995, 9, 1319.
5. Marletta, M. A. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1899.
6. Babu, B. R.; Griffith, O. W. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1998,
2, 491.
7. Narayanan, K.; Spack, L.; McMillan, K.; Kilbourn, R.
G.; Hayward, M. A.; Masters, B. S. S.; Griffith, O. W.
J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 11103.
8. Ijuin, R.; Umezawa, N.; Nagai, S.; Higuchi, T. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 2881.
9. Ji, H.; Gomez-Vidal, J. A.; Martasek, P.; Roman, L. J.;
Silverman, R. B. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6254.
10. Collins, J. L.; Shearer, B. G.; Oplinger, J. A.; Lee, S.;
Garvey, E. P.; Slater, M.; Duffy, C.; Burnette, T. C.;
Furfine, E. S. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2858.
11. Jaroch, S.; Rehwinkel, H.; Holscher, P.; Sulzle, D.;
Burton, G.; Hillmann, M.; McDonald, F. M.; Miklautz,
H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 743.
12. Beaton, H.; Hamley, P.; Nicholls, D. J.; Tinker, A. C.;
Wallace, A. V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11,
1023.
13. Lowe, J. A., III; Qian, W.; Drozda, S. E.; Volkmann, R.
A.; Nason, D.; Nelson, R. B.; Nolan, C.; Liston, D.;
Ward, K.; Faraci, S.; Verdries, K.; Seymour, P.; Majchr-
zak, M.; Villalobos, A.; White, W. F. J. Med. Chem. 2004,
47, 1575.
In summary, we have designed and synthesized a series
of 2-aminobenzothiazole inhibitors that are selective
for human and rat nNOS. Compound 14 was the most
potent and selective for human nNOS over eNOS and
iNOS, while compound 12b was the most selective for
rat nNOS over eNOS. We have shown that by introduc-
ing substituents at the 2-position of the heterocyclic
scaffold we were able to design nNOS selective com-
pounds by as much as 50-fold over eNOS for the human
enzymes. We have also shown that for a few compounds
significant differences in NOS inhibitory activities
among the rat and human enzymes can occur. We are
currently evaluating some of our selective compounds
´
14. Entrena, A.; Encarnacion Camacho, M.; Dora Carri-
on, M.; Lopez-Cara, L. C.; Velasco, G.; Leon, J.;
´
´
´
Escames, G.; Acuna-Castroviejo, D.; Tapias, V.; Gallo,