A R T I C L E S
Zou et al.
Scheme 1
have indeed indicated an enhanced hydridic character, mainly
due to the design of the hydride complex bearing strong
σ-donating phosphines and a mesityl carbyne ligand in trans
position, which is known to exert a strong trans-influence/
effect.7 A X-ray diffraction analysis5a of 1 demonstrated that
the overall geometry about the tungsten center is that of a
slightly distorted octahedron with a distance for the W-H bond
of 2.0 Å, while DFT calculations revealed a W-H distance of
1.88 Å. Both results point to a long and relatively weak TM-H
bond.6
On the basis of these structural properties and the high activity
in H-transfer reactions, it was not too surprising to find a very
high value of the W-H bond ionicity determined by two
deuteride (T1 ) 300 s (298 K)) and did not indicate any
intermolecular exchange at this temperature.11,15
Isomerization of 1 into W[(C(TMP)](dmpe)2H (TMP )
2,3,5-Trimethylphenyl) (5). At 60 °C W(CMes)(dmpe)2H (1)
was observed to rearrange within 2 weeks to form W[(C(TMP)]-
(dmpe)2H (TMP ) 2,3,5-trimethylphenyl) (5) in benzene or
toluene solution with a 90% spectroscopic yield of 5 (isolated
yield 71%) (Scheme 1).
The isomerization was first thought to be initiated by light.
However, a UV irradiation experiment with a mercury lamp
(125 W) in a cold water bath did not reveal any changes.
The 1H NMR spectrum of 5 displays a quintet for the hydride
ligand at -5.62 ppm (2JPH ) 35 Hz, JWH ) 34 Hz) about 1
ppm at lower field than that of 1. The rearrangement of the
aromatic ring becomes also obvious in the 1H NMR spectrum,
since 5 shows for the MeAr groups three singlets of equal
intensity. In the aromatic chemical shift region two distinct
resonances are detected assigned to the two nonequivalent HAr
atoms. The 31P NMR spectrum indicated equivalence of all four
phosphorus nuclei showing a singlet at 25.6 ppm (JWP ) 276
Hz), which is shifted about 0.5 ppm to lower field in comparison
with 1.
The spectroscopically derived structure of 5 was eventually
confirmed by a single-crystal X-ray diffraction study. Red single
crystals were grown by cooling a hexane solution to -35 °C.
The ORTEP plot of 5 is shown in Figure 1. Selected bond
lengths and bond angles are listed in Table 1.
In the X-ray diffraction study the Hhydride ligand (H49) was
found in a difference Fourier map. Its coordinates were kept
fixed, and the isotropic displacement parameters were refined.
All other positions of H-atoms were recalculated after each
refinement cycle.
As shown in Figure 1, 5 possesses a similar structure to that
of 1 with a square bipyramidal geometry of the heavy atoms
around the tungsten center with four phosphorus atoms in the
quasi equatorial plane, while the Hhydride atom and the carbyne
ligand are located perpendicular to that plane in trans positions
similar to the structure of 1.
The structural data of 5 can be interpreted in terms of reduced
molecular strain in comparison with 1. For instance, as listed
in Table 1, the W(1)sC(13) bond length of 5 is 1.838(9) Å,
which is significantly shorter than the corresponding bond of 1
(1.863(6) Å). Presumably this shortening is due to less non-
bonding contacts between the MeAr and Medmpe groups (closest
distance of 5 2.519 Å). The presence of MeAr‚‚‚Medmpe steric
repulsion can also be derived from the C(14)sC(13)sW(1)
“hinging” angle of the aromatic ring of 5 (174.7(7)°) bending
2
different techniques. VT H-T1 NMR relaxation times were
determined in toluene-d8 solution for the deuterium labeled
compound 2, which were used for the calculation of the
deuterium quadrupole coupling constant (DQCC) and the ionic
bond character (i) in the covalent W-H bond.8 The rate of 2H
spin-lattice relaxation is dominated by quadrupolar interactions.
2
2 shows a broad multiplet at δ ) -6.60 ppm in its H NMR
spectrum. The logarithmic 2H-T1 times of the 2H resonance for
the D ligand of 2 measured at 213 K (76.7 MHz) and plotted
as a function of 1/T were used to extract a T1 min value of 59
ms, which corresponds to a DQCC of 34.1 kHz and (i) )
85%9,10 calculated from (i) ) 1-(DQCC/227).9 We have also
2
employed solid-state H NMR as an alternative technique to
evaluate the DQCC in 210 whereby the DQCC can be directly
extracted from the Pake doublet splitting.11 A similar value of
34.8 kHz for the DQCC was found in nice agreement with the
2
liquid H-T1 measurement. The degree of W-D bond ionicity
in 2 of about 85% is higher than values reported for (CO)5MnD
((i) ) 70%), Cp2WD2 ((i) ) 76%), WD(NO)(CO)2(PMe)2 ((i)
) 79%), Cp2ZrD2 ((i) ) 79%), WD(NO)(CO)(PMe)3 ((i) )
82%),9 and MoD(NO)(dmpe)2 ((i) ) 84%).12 The smallest
known experimental DQCC value, 33 kHz, (i) ) 85%, is that
of the LiD molecule,13 which is close to our results for the trans-
W(CMes)(dmpe)2D complex, which approaches the ionic limit
of an M-D bond with a zero DQCC value. On the other hand
a DQCC value of 227 kHz in HD14 represents the 100% covalent
end of the scale. The solid state measurements in addition
revealed a very long relaxation time for the metal bound
(7) Appleton, T. G.; Clark, H.; Manzer, L. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1973, 10, 335.
Atwood, J. D. Inorganic and Organometallic Reaction Mechanisms, 2nd
ed.; VCH Publishers: New York, 1997. Shriver, D. F., Atkins, P. W., Eds.
Inorganic Chemistry; W. H. Freeman and Co: New York, 1999. Basolo,
F.; Pearson, R. G. Progr. Inorg. Chem. 1962, 4, 381. Faller, J. W.; Lambert,
C.; Mazzieri, M. R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1990, 383, 161. Faller, J. W.;
Mazzieri, M. R.; Nguyen, J. T.; Parr, J.; Tokunaga, M. Pure Appl. Chem.
1964, 66, 1463.
(8) (a) Nietlispach, D.; Bakhmutov, V. I.; Berke, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 9191. (b) Gusev, D. G.; Nietlispach, D.; Vymenits, A. B.; Bakhmutov,
V. I.; Berke, H. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 3270. (c) Wharton, L.; Gold, L.
P.; Klemperer, W. J. Chem. Phys. 1962, 37, 2149.
(9) (a) Fee, F. W.; Chan, M. C. W.; Cheung, K. K.; Che, C. M. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1998, 563, 191. (b) Zhang, L.; Gamasa, M. P.; Gimeno, J.; Carbajo,
R. J.; Lopez-Ortiz, F.; Lanfranchi, M.; Tiripicchio, A. Organometallics
1996, 15, 4274.
(10) (a) Fyfe, C. A. Solid State NMR for Chemists; C.F.C. Press: Ontario, 1983.
(b) Dixon, M.; Overill, R. E.; Platt, E. J. Mol. Struct. 1978, 48, 115. (c)
Soda, G.; Chiba, T. J. Chem. Phys. 1969, 50, 439. (d) Butler, L. G.; Brown,
T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6541. (e) Kim, A.; Fronczek, F. R.;
Butler, L. G.; Chen, S.; Keiter, E. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9090.
(11) Smith, J. A. S. J. Chem. Educ. 1971, 48, 39.
(12) Liang, F.; Schmalle, H. W.; Fox, T.; Berke, H. Organometallics 2003, 22,
3393.
(13) (a) Wei, Y.; Fung, B. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 55, 1486. (b) Ireland, P. S.;
Olson, L. W.; Brown, T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 3548. (c) Jarrett,
W. L.; Farlee, R. D.; Butler, L. G. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 1381.
(14) Guo, K.; Jarrett, W. L.; Butler, L. G. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 3001.
(15) Hayashi, S. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 2238. Hayashi, S. J. Phys. Chem. Solids
2003, 64, 2227. Hayashi, S. J. Solid State Chem. 2003, 170, 82. Hayashi,
S. J. Alloy Compd. 2002, 330, 443.
9
7196 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 22, 2007