Cross-coupling reaction of allylic ethers with aryl Grignard reagents catalyzed by a nickel pincer complex

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules24122296

A cross-coupling reaction of allylic aryl ethers with arylmagnesium reagents was investigated using β-aminoketonato- and β-diketiminato-based pincer-type nickel(II) complexes as catalysts. An β-aminoketonato nickel(II) complex bearing a diphenylphosphino group as a third donor effectively catalyzed the reaction to afford the target cross-coupled products, allylbenzene derivatives, in high yield. The regioselective reaction of a variety of substituted cinnamyl ethers proceeded to give the corresponding linear products. In contrast, α- and γ-alkyl substituted allylic ethers afforded a mixture of the linear and branched products. These results indicated that the coupling reaction proceeded via a π-allyl nickel intermediate.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules24122296

molecules
Article
Cross-Coupling Reaction of Allylic Ethers with Aryl
Grignard Reagents Catalyzed by a Nickel
Pincer Complex
Toru Hashimoto * , Kei Funatsu, Atsufumi Ohtani, Erika Asano and Yoshitaka Yamaguchi *
Department of Advanced Materials Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Yokohama National University,
79-5 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya-ku, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan; funatsu-kei-rh@ynu.jp (K.F.);
ohtani-atsufumi-cs@ynu.jp (A.O.); asano-erika-cy@ynu.jp (E.A.)
* Correspondence: hashimoto-toru-kh@ynu.ac.jp (T.H.); yamaguchi-yoshitaka-hw@ynu.ac.jp (Y.Y.);
Tel.: +81-45-339-3940 (T.H.); +81-45-339-3932 (Y.Y.)
ꢀꢁꢂꢀꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇ
Academic Editor: Kouki Matsubara
Received: 30 May 2019; Accepted: 18 June 2019; Published: 21 June 2019
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆ
Abstract: A cross-coupling reaction of allylic aryl ethers with arylmagnesium reagents was
investigated using
β-aminoketonato- and β-diketiminato-based pincer-type nickel(II) complexes as
catalysts. An -aminoketonato nickel(II) complex bearing a diphenylphosphino group as a third
β
donor effectively catalyzed the reaction to afford the target cross-coupled products, allylbenzene
derivatives, in high yield. The regioselective reaction of a variety of substituted cinnamyl ethers
proceeded to give the corresponding linear products. In contrast, α- and γ-alkyl substituted allylic
ethers afforded a mixture of the linear and branched products. These results indicated that the
coupling reaction proceeded via a π-allyl nickel intermediate.
Keywords: pincer-type nickel(II) complex; cross-coupling; allylic ether
1. Introduction
Transition metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions are efficient and widely utilized synthetic
protocols for constructing carbon–carbon bonds [1]. The reactions of allylic electrophiles with
aryl metal reagents provide promising methodologies for the formation of C(sp3)–C(sp2) bonds.
Allylic electrophiles with efficient leaving groups, such as allylic halides, acetates, and phosphates, are
commonly used in these reactions [2–6]. In contrast to these allylic electrophiles, allylic ethers have
been considered less-reactive electrophiles in cross-coupling reactions, whereas these electrophiles are
easily accessible, cheap, and easy to handle. Therefore, the development of effective metal catalysts
for coupling reactions utilizing allylic ethers as electrophiles in a highly regioselective manner has
attracted considerable attention. The choice of the metal catalyst is critical for linear and branched
selectivity. Although precious metals such as Pd and Ir have been extensively explored in selective
allylic substitution reactions [2–4], recent efforts have focused on first-row late transition-metals
such as Cu, Co, Fe, and Ni, whose complexes act as highly active catalysts. For example, Feringa
reported the asymmetric allylic alkylation of acyclic allylic ethers with organolithium reagents using a
Cu/phosphoramidite system [
reaction of allylic ethers with Grignard reagents in a linear manner [
allylic arylation reaction to be performed [ 12]. Recently, Ni pincer complexes have been reported as
7]. Oshima and Yorimitsu reported a cobalt-catalyzed cross-coupling
8]. Iron catalysts also enable the
9–
effective catalysts for the coupling reaction of allylic ethers with aryl zinc reagents [13].
In recent years, tridentate pincer-type complexes have generated significant interest because the
pincer-type ligand stabilizes the metal complex and its properties can be tuned to achieve optimal
reactivity [14–25]. We have recently reported the synthesis of a range of pincer-type nickel(II) complexes
Molecules 2019, 24, 2296; doi:10.3390/molecules24122296
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules

Molecules 2019, 24, 2296
2 of 12
(1a–d) utilizing a combination of β-aminoketonato or β-diketiminato frameworks with a third donor
such as an amino or phosphino group [26 27]. Our systematic study on these nickel(II) complexes
,
revealed that modifying the ligand framework has a significant influence on the catalytic performance
in the cross-coupling reaction of aryl halides with arylmagnesium reagents. In particular, nickel(II)
complexes 1b and 1d bearing a diphenylphosphino group as the third donor enable the utilization
of aryl fluorides as electrophiles in the reaction [27]. In order to elucidate the reactivity of the
nickel(II) complex toward the relatively robust C-O bond in an allylic aryl ether, we herein describe
the cross-coupling reaction of allylic ethers with arylmagnesium reagents using nickel(II) complexes
(1a–d) (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. The coupling reaction of allylic ethers with aryl Grignard reagents using Ni(II) pincer
complexes (1a–d).
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
2.1.1. Initial Optimization of the Nickel(II) Complexes
To evaluate the catalytic activity of nickel(II) complexes 1a
cinnamyl phenyl ether 2a and 3 equivalents of p-tolylmagnesium bromide 3a using nickel(II) complexes
1a (2.5 mol%) in THF at room temperature (Table 1), referring to our previously study on the biaryl
–d, we carried out the reaction between
–d
coupling reaction of aryl chlorides with arylmagnesium reagents [26]. Complex 1a gave the linear
product 4a in only 7% yield. Complex 1b showed high catalytic activity to give 4a in 86% yield.
Nickel(II) complexes 1c and 1d bearing N,N,N- and N,N,P-type ligands were not
a
Table 1. The cross-coupling reaction of 2a with 3a using Ni(II) pincer complexes (1).
Ni cat 1
Yield of 4a (%) b
Recovery of 2a (%) b
1b
86
0
1d
4
90
1a
7
43
1c
2
83
a
The reaction was carried out using 2a (0.5 mmol) and 3a (1.5 mmol) in the presence of
1
(0.0125 mmol, 2.5 mol%)
in THF (5 mL) for 24 h at room temperature. The yield of 4a and recovery of 2a were determined by 1H NMR
b
analysis using pyrazine as the internal standard.

Molecules 2019, 24, 2296
3 of 12
effective in the reaction and afforded the target product in 2% and 4% yield, respectively. In these
cases, a large amount of 2a remained unreacted (see 2.3 Reaction mechanism section). In all cases, the
branched product 5a was not detected and 4,40-bitolyl (6a) derived from 3a was formed as a by-product
(9–30%). In the absence of complex 1a–d, the reaction did not give any coupled products.
2.1.2. Investigation of the Effect of the Solvent and Nickel(II) Complexes
We next examined the solvent effect using the reaction between 2a and 3 equivalents of 3a with
complex 1b. The results are summarized in Table 2. The choice of the solvent used is essential to produce
product 4a in satisfactory yield. When cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) was employed as solvent, the
coupled product 4a was obtained in 89% yield (entry 2). The yield of 4a decreased in 1,4-dioxane (71%,
entry 3). t-Butyl methyl ether (MTBE) and toluene were also effective solvents for the reaction and
produced 4a in 82% and 83%, respectively (entries 4 and 5). CH2Cl2 and N,N-dimethylformamide
(DMF) were not suitable for the reaction (entries 6 and 7). Et2O provided the best result, affording
product 4a in 99% yield, from which 4a was isolated in 94% yield (entry 8). The other nickel(II)
complexes 1a, 1c, and 1d exhibited relatively low catalytic activity, even in Et2O (entries 9–11). When
the amount of Grignard reagent 3a used was reduced to 1.5 equivalents, complex 1b acted as an
effective catalyst to give 4a in an isolated yield of 91% (entry 12).
a
Table 2. Solvent screening using the reaction between 2a and 3a with complex 1.
4a (%) b
4a (%) b
Entry
Ni Cat 1
Solvent
Entry
Ni Cat 1
Solvent
1
2
3
4
5
6
a
1b
1b
1b
1b
1b
1b
THF
CPME
1,4-dioxane
MTBE
toluene
CH2Cl2
86
89
71
82
83
24
7
8
9
10
11
12d
1b
1b
1a
1c
1d
1b
DMF
Et2O
Et2O
Et2O
Et2O
Et2O
0
99(94) c
22
19
30
95(91) c
The reaction was carried out using 2a (0.5 mmol) and 3a (1.5 mmol) in the presence of
1
(0.0125 mmol, 2.5 mol%) in
solvent (5 mL) for 24 h at room temperature. The yield of 4a was determined by 1H NMR analysis using pyrazine
as the internal standard. Isolated yield. 0.75 mmol of 3a was used.
b
c
d
2.1.3. Investigation of the Effect of the Leaving Group on the Allylic Electrophile
In order to investigate the influence of the leaving group (LG) on the allylic substrate, we carried
out the reaction between various cinnamyl electrophiles (2a–d, 7, and 8) with 1.5 equivalents of 3a in
the presence of 1b (2.5 mol%) in Et2O (Table 3). Cinnamyl phenyl ether 2a was converted into 4a in
91% isolated yield. In the case of cinnamyl p-methoxyphenyl ether 2b, the cross-coupled product 4a
was isolated in excellent yield (96%). When the amount of nickel(II) complex 1b used was reduced to 1
mol%, 2a was converted into 4a in 60% yield, whereas in the case of 2b, product 4a was isolated in 95%
yield. The reaction of cinnamyl ether 2c bearing a p-trifluoromethylphenyl group in the leaving group
afforded 4a in 62% yield. p-Methoxyphenoxide, which has an electron-donating group on the aromatic
ring, acted as an effective leaving group. Methyl ether 2d was also applicable in the reaction using
2.5 mol% of 1b to give product 4a in 90% yield. When 1 mol% of 1b was employed, the product was
obtained in 73% yield. Cinnamyl alcohol
yield of 4a was low (40%) and was recovered in 54%. In the case of cinnamyl chloride
4a was formed in low yield (38%).
7
was also able to be used as an electrophile, however, the
7
8, compound

Molecules 2019, 24, 2296
4 of 12
a
Table 3. The effect of the leaving group (LG) on the cinnamyl electrophiles.
2c, 62% c
8, 38% c
2a, 91%, 60% b
2d, 90% c, 73% b
2b, 96%, 95% b
7, 40% c,d
a The reaction was carried out using the cinnamyl electrophile (
2, 7, 8 (0.5 mmol)), and 3a (0.75 mmol) in the presence of
1b (0.0125 mmol, 2.5 mol%) in Et2O (5 mL) for 24 h at room temperature. Isolated yield. b 1 mol% of 1b was used. c The
yield of 4a was determined by 1H NMR analysis using pyrazine as the internal standard. d 1.25 mmol of 3a was used.
2.2. Substrate Scope
With the optimized conditions in hand, we next examined the substrate scope of the reaction using
allylic ethers bearing a p-methoxyphenoxide group as the leaving group and a range of arylmagnesium
reagents ( ) in the presence of 1 mol% of 1b as the catalyst (Table 4). The reaction of cinnamyl ether 2b
2
3
with phenylmagnesium bromide 3b gave the coupled product 4b in excellent yield (94%) with linear
selectivity. In the case of 4-methoxyphenylmagnesium bromide 3c, which has an electron-donating
group on the aromatic ring, the coupled product 4c was isolated in 94% yield. The reaction with
4-N,N-dimethylaminophenylmagnesium bromide 3d gave product 4d in 95% yield. We recently reported
that complexes 1b and 1d act as an effective catalyst for the cross-coupling reaction of aryl fluorides with
arylmagnesium reagents [27]. In the reaction with 4-fluorophenylmagnesium bromide 3e, product 4e
was obtained in 96% yield. In the present reaction conditions, the reaction of 4e as an electrophile with
Grignard reagent 3e did not occur. In cases of sterically congested arylmagnesium reagents, such as
1-naphthylmagnesium bromide 3f, o-tolylmagnesium bromide 3g and 2,4,6-trimethylphenylmagnesium
bromide 3h, the corresponding products 4f, 4g, and 4h were obtained in 85%, 79%, and 80%, respectively,
in the presence of 2.5 mol% of 1b under refluxing conditions. The reaction of p-substituted cinnamyl ether
2i, which has an electron-donating group (OMe) on the aromatic ring, with p-tolylmagnesium bromide 3a
gave product 4i in 78% yield. In the case of electrophile 2j bearing an electron-withdrawing group (F), the
coupled product 4j was obtained in 89% yield. In the coupling reaction, alkyl- and benzylmagnesium
reagents were not suitable as nucleophiles. In addition, the reaction using a cis/trans mixture of 2b0
(cis:trans = 86:14) with Grignard reagent 3a afforded the trans product (4a) in 88% yield as a sole product
(Table 5, entry 1). In contrast to cinnamyl ethers,
of the linear and branched isomers (4k and 5k) in 96% yield. The ratio of 4k
54:46 using 1H NMR spectroscopy (entry 2). These results indicate that the reaction proceeds via a
nickel intermediate (vide infra). Therefore, we examined the reaction using secondary allylic ethers as
electrophiles. The reaction of an allylic ether bearing a phenyl group at the -position (2h) proceeded
γ
-alkyl substituted allylic ether 2g afforded a mixture
5k was determined to be
-allyl
:
π
α
with linear selectivity to afford product 4a as a single regioisomer in high yield (94%). In this reaction,
branched isomer 5a was not detected (entry 3). In contrast, an allylic ether bearing an alkyl group at the
α
-position (2i) was converted into a mixture of regioisomers (4k and 5k) in 93% yield. The ratio of 4k
was determined to be 57:43 using 1H NMR spectroscopy (entry 4). The reaction of a mixture of 2j and 2k
2j 2k = 67:33) gave the linear product 4l in 90% yield with high regioselectivity. The branched isomer (5l)
:5k
(
:
was not detected (entry 5). The regioselectivity in this reaction probably depends on both maximizing the
resonance stabilization energy on the coupling product and minimizing steric hindrance in the coupling of
the Grignard reagent with the putative
π-allyl nickel species [13]. In the reaction of the γ-alkyl substituted
allylic ether, the steric influence should operate predominantly for the formation of the product.

Molecules 2019, 24, 2296
5 of 12
a
Table 4. The cross-coupling reaction of allylic ethers 2 with arylmagnesium reagents 3.
4d, 95% b
4b, 94%
4e, 96%
4c, 94%
4f, 85% c
4i, 78% b
4g, 79% d
4j, 89% f
4h, 80% e
a
The reaction was carried out using
2 (0.5 mmol) and 3 (0.75 mmol) in the presence of 1b (0.005 mmol, 1.0 mol%) in
b
c
Et2O (5 mL) for 24 h at room temperature. Isolated yield. 2.5 mol% of 1b was used. 2.5 mol% of 1b and 1.5 mmol
of 3f were used. The reaction was carried out under reflux conditions for 72 h. 2.5 mol% of 1b and 1.1 mmol of 3g
were used. The reaction was carried out under reflux conditions for 24 h. 2.5 mol% of 1b and 1.5 mmol of 3h were
used. The reaction was carried out under reflux conditions for 72 h. 2.5 mol% of 1b and 1.5 mmol of 3a were used.
d
e
f
a
Table 5. The cross-coupling reaction of various allylic ethers 2 with 3a.
Entry
2
X (mol%)
4/5
4 + 5 (%)
2b0
1
2
3
1.0
2.5
2.5
4a:5a = >99:<1
4k:5k = 54:46
4a:5a = >99:<1
88
96
94
(cis:trans = 86:14)
2g
2h
4
5
2i
2j
2.5
2.5
4k:5k = 57:43
4l:5l = >99:<1
93
90
2k
(2j:2k = 67:33)
a
The reaction was carried out using
2 (0.5–1.0 mmol) and 3 (0.75–1.5 mmol) in the presence of 1b (0.005–0.0125
mmol, 1.0–2.5 mol%) in Et2O (5 mL) for 24 h at room temperature. Isolated yield. (Ar = 4-MeOC6H4).

Molecules 2019, 24, 2296
6 of 12
Finally, we investigated the reactivity of the allylic C(sp3)–O and naphthyl C(sp2)–O bonds in 2l
(Scheme 2). Scission of the allylic C(sp3)–O bond in 2l selectively occurred and thus, allylated product
4a was obtained in 68% yield.
Scheme 2. Selective cleavage of the allylic C(sp3)–O bond in cinnamyl naphthyl ether 2l catalyzed
by 1b.
2.3. Reaction Mechanism
We examined the stoichiometric reaction to gain insight into the reaction mechanism (Table 6). In
the reaction of nickel(II) complex 1b with an equimolar amount of allylic ether 2b, oxidative addition of
the C-O bond of 2b to 1b did not occur and 2b was recovered in 96%. In contrast, when 1b was treated
with an excess amount of phenylmagnesium reagent 3b, 1b was converted into another nickel species.
In the 31P{1H} NMR spectrum, the signal derived from 1b (37.5 ppm) disappeared [26] and a new
signal was observed at 49.1 ppm, whose resonance was due to the formation of a new nickel species.
However, characterization of this nickel complex was not successful. Subsequently, we examined the
reaction with various amounts of 3a in the presence of 1b and 2b. The obtained results are summarized
in Table 6. In the reaction using a mixture of 1b and 2b with 1 equivalent of 3a, the coupled product 4a
was not detected with 2b being recovered in 83%. In the case of the reaction using 2 equivalents of 3a
,
the coupled product (4a) was formed in 23% yield. Using 3 equivalents of 3a, the reaction proceeded
smoothly and 2b was completely consumed to give the coupled product (4a) in 83% yield, along with
the formation of 4,40-bitolyl (6a, 0.19 mmol). The reaction using 4 equivalents of 3a also gave the
product (4a) in 83% yield. Therefore, we assumed that two or more equivalents of the arylmagnesium
reagent are required to for the reaction to proceed via the generation of an anionic nickel(0) species,
which is the active species for the activation of the allylic ether (vide infra).
a
Table 6. The stoichiometric reaction of allylic ether 2b with aryl Grignard reagent 3a.
4a (%) b
Recovery of 2b (%) b
Entry
X (equiv)
6a (mmol) c
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
N.D.
23
83
0.03
0.09
0.19
0.23
83
40
0
83
0
a
b
c
Reaction conditions: 1b (0.2 mmol), 2b (0.2 mmol), and 3a in Et2O (5 mL) at room temperature (Ar = 4-MeOC6H4).
The yield of 4a and recovery of 2b were determined by 1H NMR analysis using pyrazine as the internal standard.
The amount of 6a was determined by 1H NMR analysis using pyrazine as the internal standard.

Molecules 2019, 24, 2296
7 of 12
Although the detailed reaction mechanism for the nickel catalyzed allyl-aryl coupling reaction
was not clear, a plausible mechanism is proposed in Scheme 3 [13 28]. Initially, nickel(II) complex
1b is converted into anionic nickel(0) species through its reaction with at least 2 equivalents of
arylmagnesium reagent accompanied by the formation of a biaryl. Then, the low valent nickel(0)
species ( ) reacts with the allylic electrophile at the nickel center to afford -allyl nickel species II (as
shown in Table 5): For example, -alkyl substituted allylic ether 2g was converted into a mixture
of linear and branched isomers. We have recently reported that the steric and electronic properties
of the nickel(II) complexes 26 27]. The DFT calculations of complexes reveal that the highest
occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) levels of these complexes increase in the order 1a ≈ 1b 1c ≈
1d. We expected that complexes 1c and 1d worked as effective catalysts for this coupling reaction.
However, the bulky substituent (mesityl group) on the ligand framework inhibits to form -allyl
,
I
I
π
γ
1
[
,
1
<
π
nickel species derived from 1c and 1d. Therefore, complexes 1c and 1d show poor catalytic activities.
In contrast, complex 1b acts as an effective catalyst for the coupling reaction, because of constructing
an appropriate steric and electronic environment around nickel center by the O,N,P-pincer ligand.
After the formation of
reagent leads to the formation of a
π
-allyl nickel species II, its subsequent transmetalation with the arylmagnesium
-allyl nickel species bearing aryl ligand III and/or IV. We assumed
σ
that the formation of intermediate III is more favorable than IV due to steric hindrance. Therefore,
the selectivity in the reaction was influenced by the substituent on the allylic substrate. Finally, the
desired products
4
and/or
5 are released via reductive elimination from the Ni center to regenerate the
nickel(0) species (I) and thus, the catalytic cycle is completed. One of the possible reaction pathways
involved in an allylic substitution reaction is the attack of the nucleophile on
this mechanism cannot be excluded.
π-allyl nickel species I;
Scheme 3. A plausible catalytic cycle for the cross-coupling reaction of an allylic ether and arylmagnesium reagent.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. General Information
All manipulations involving air- and moisture-sensitive organometallic compounds were carried
out under a nitrogen atmosphere, which was dried with SICAPENT (Merck Co., Inc., Germany,
Darmstadt), using standard Schlenk tube or high vacuum techniques. All solvents were distilled

Molecules 2019, 24, 2296
8 of 12
over appropriate drying agents prior to use. Nickel complexes 1a
–c
[
26] and 1d
[
27] were prepared
according to literature methods. Allylic aryl ethers 2a–c, 2e–g, and 2l were prepared from the reaction
of their corresponding allylic halides and 4-substituted phenols using K2CO3 in acetone. Allylic methyl
ether 2d was prepared via the reduction of the corresponding aldehyde using NaBH4 followed by
methylation using methyl iodide. Allylic methyl ethers 2h and 2i were prepared from addition of
the corresponding aldehyde with vinylmagnesium bromide followed by methylation using methyl
iodide. A mixture of 2j and 2k was prepared via the reduction of cinnamyl methyl ketone using
NaBH4 followed by a Mitsunobu reaction using 4-methoxyphenol. All other reagents employed in this
research were commercially available and used without any further purification.
Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR), carbon nuclear magnetic resonance (13C{1H}
NMR), and phosphorus nuclear magnetic resonance (31P{1H} NMR) spectra were recorded on BRUKER
1
DRX-500 and JEOL ECA 500 spectrometers at ambient temperature. H NMR chemical shifts were
recorded in ppm using tetramethylsilane (TMS) or the solvent resonance peak as an internal standard
(TMS: 0.00 ppm, C6D6: 7.16 ppm). 13C{1H} NMR chemical shifts were recorded in ppm using the
solvent resonance peak as an internal standard (CDCl3: 77.0 ppm, C6D6: 128.0 pm). 31P{1H} NMR
chemical shifts were recorded in ppm using H3PO4 as an external standard (H3PO4: 0.0 ppm).
3.2. General Procedure for the Cross-Coupling Reaction of Allylic Ethers with Arylmagnesium Reagents
A 50 mL Schlenk tube was charged with 1b (1.0–2.5 mol%), the respective allylic electrophile
(1.0 mmol), Et2O (2.5–5 mL, 0.2 M based on the electrophile), and the aryl Grignard reagent (1.5–3.0
equiv.) at room temperature. The coupling reaction was carried out at room temperature for 24 h.
After quenching with 1 M HCl aq. (5 mL), the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (5
×
3 mL).
The combined organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL) and dried over anhydrous MgSO4.
After filtration and removal of all volatiles from the filtrate, the residue was purified by column
chromatography on silica gel.
1-Cinnamyl-4-methylbenzene (4a): The compound 4a was synthesized from 1-methoxy-4-{[(2E)-3-
phenylprop-2-en-1-yl]oxy}benzene 2b (240.9 mg, 1.00 mmol) with p-tolylmagnesium bromide 3a
(1.4 mL, 1.1 M in THF, 1.5 mmol) in the presence of 1b (4.1 mg, 1 mol%) in Et2O (5 mL) at room
1
temperature for 24 h (198.0 mg, 95% yield, colorless liquid). H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra have been
attached in the Supplementary Materials. The product was characterized by comparison with the
previously reported 1H and 13C{1H} NMR data [29].
The compound 4a was synthesized from 2b0 (cis:trans = 86:14, 119.6 mg, 0.50 mmol) with 3a (0.70 mL,
1.1 M in THF, 0.77 mmol) in the presence of 1b (2.0 mg, 1 mol%) in Et2O (2.5 mL) at room temperature
for 24 h (91.1 mg, 88% yield).
The compound 4a was synthesized from (1-methoxy-2-propen-1-yl)benzene 2h (147.3 mg, 0.99 mmol)
with 3a (1.40 mL, 1.1 M in THF, 1.5 mmol) in the presence of 1b (10.1 mg, 2.5 mol%) in Et2O (5 mL) at
room temperature for 24 h (194.2 mg, 94% yield).
The compound 4a was synthesized from 2-{[(2E)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl]oxy}naphthalene 2l (260.9 mg,
1.00 mmol) with 3a (1.4 mL, 1.09 M in THF, 1.5 mmol) in the presence of 1b (10.1 mg, 2.5 mol%) in Et2O
(5 mL) at room temperature for 24 h. The yield of 4a was determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude
product using pyrazine as the internal standard (68% yield).
(E)-Prop-1-ene-1,3-diyldibenzene (4b). The compound 4b was synthesized from 2b (238.8 mg, 0.99 mmol)
with phenylmagnesium bromide 3b (1.4 mL, 1.1 M in THF, 1.5 mmol) in the presence of 1b (4.06 mg,
1 mol%) in Et2O (5 mL) at room temperature for 24 h (181.2 mg, 94% yield, colorless liquid). 1H
and 13C{1H} NMR spectra have been attached in the Supplementary Materials. The product was
characterized by comparison with the previously reported 1H and 13C{1H} NMR data [30].

Molecules 2019, 24, 2296
9 of 12
1-Cinnamyl-4-methoxylbenzene (4c). The compound 4c was synthesized from 2b (238.4 mg, 0.99 mmol)
with 4-methoxylphenylmagnesium bromide 3c (3.0 mL, 0.5 M in THF, 1.5 mmol) in the presence of 1b
(3.90 mg, 1 mol%) in Et2O (5 mL) at room temperature for 24 h (209.1 mg, 94% yield, colorless liquid).
1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra have been attached in the Supplementary Materials. The product was
characterized by comparison with the previously reported 1H and 13C{1H} NMR data [29].
1-Cinnamyl-N,N-dimethylaniline (4d). The compound 4d was synthesized from 2b (239.2 mg, 1.00 mmol)
with 4-N,N-dimethylaminophenylmagnesium bromide 3d (2.0 mL, 0.75 M in THF, 1.5 mmol) in the
presence of 1b (10.2 mg, 2.5 mol%) in Et2O (5 mL) at room temperature for 24 h (224.5 mg, 95% yield,
yellow liquid). 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra have been attached in the Supplementary Materials.
The product was characterized by comparison with the previously reported 1H and 13C{1H} NMR
data [29].
1-Cinnamyl-4-fluorobenzene (4e). The compound 4e was synthesized from 2b (241.1 mg, 1.00 mmol)
with 4-fluorophenylmagnesium bromide 3e (1.5 mL, 1.0 M in THF, 1.5 mmol) in the presence of 1b
(9.9 mg, 2.5 mol%) in Et2O (5 mL) at room temperature for 24 h (230.1 mg, 96% yield, colorless liquid).
1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra have been attached in the Supplementary Materials. The product was
characterized by comparison with the previously reported 1H and 13C{1H} NMR data [29].
1-Cinnamylnaphthalene (4f). The compound 4f was synthesized from 2b (122.0 mg, 0.51 mmol) with
1-napthylmagnesium bromide 3f (5.8 mL, 0.26 M in THF, 1.51 mmol) in the presence of 1b (5.1 mg,
1
2.5 mol%) in Et2O (5 mL) at reflux conditions for 72 h (105.5 mg, 85% yield, white solid). H and 13C{1H}
NMR spectra have been attached in the Supplementary Materials. The product was characterized by
comparison with the previously reported 1H and 13C{1H} NMR data [31].
1-Cinnamyl-2-methylbenzene (4g). The compound 4g was synthesized from 2b (240.3 mg, 1.00 mmol)
with o-tolyl magnesium bromide 3g (3.5 mL, 0.63 M in THF, 2.2 mmol) in the presence of 1b (10.3 mg,
2.5 mol%) in Et2O (5 mL) at reflux conditions for 24 h (164.7 mg, 79% yield, colorless liquid). 1H
and 13C{1H} NMR spectra have been attached in the Supplementary Materials. The product was
characterized by comparison with the previously reported 1H and 13C{1H} NMR data [29].
1-Cinnamyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzene (4h). The compound 4h was synthesized from 2b (241.7 mg,
1.01 mmol) with 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl magnesium bromide 3h (3.5 mL, 0.86 M in THF, 3.0 mmol) in
the presence of 1b (10.4 mg, 2.5 mol%) in Et2O (5 mL) at reflux conditions for 72 h (191.5 mg, 80% yield,
1
colorless liquid). H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra have been attached in the Supplementary Materials.
The product was characterized by comparison with the previously reported 1H and 13C{1H} NMR
data [32].
1-Methoxy-4-[(1E)-3-(4-methylphenyl)prop-1-ene-1-yl]benzene (4i). The compound 4i was synthesized
from 1-methoxy-4-{[(1E)-3-(4-methoxyphenoxy)prop-1-en-1-yl]oxy}benzene 2e (134.3 mg, 0.50 mmol)
with 3a (0.70 mL, 1.1 M in THF, 0.77 mmol) in the presence of 1b (5.0 mg, 2.5 mol%) in Et2O (2.5 mL) at
1
room temperature for 24 h (92.9 mg, 78% yield, colorless liquid). H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra have
been attached in the Supplementary Materials. The product was characterized by comparison with the
previously reported 1H and 13C{1H} NMR data [28].
1-Fluoro-4-[(1E)-3-(4-methylphenyl)prop-1-ene-1-yl]benzene (4j). The compound 4j was synthesized from
1-fluoro-4-{[(1E)-3-(4-methoxyphenoxy)prop-1-en-1-yl]oxy}benzene 2f (131.2 mg, 0.51 mmol) with 3a
(1.4 mL, 1.1 M in THF, 1.5 mmol) in the presence of 1b (5.3 mg, 2.5 mol%) in Et2O (2.5 mL) at room
1
temperature for 24 h (102.4 mg, 89% yield, colorless liquid). H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra have been
attached in the Supplementary Materials. The product was characterized by comparison with the
previously reported 1H and 13C{1H} NMR data [33].
Mixture of 1-methyl-4-[(2E)-5-phenylpent-2-ene-1-yl]benzene (4k) and 1-methyl-4-(5-phenylpent-1
-ene-3-yl)benzene(5k). The compounds 4k and 5k were synthesized from 1-methoxy-4-{[(2E)-5-
phenylpent-2-en-1-yl]oxy}benzene 2g (130.2 mg, 0.49 mmol) with 3a (0.70 mL, 1.1 M in THF, 0.77 mmol)

Molecules 2019, 24, 2296
10 of 12
in the presence of 1b (5.1 mg, 2.5 mol%) in Et2O (2.5 mL) at room temperature for 24 h (110.1 mg, 96%
1
yield, 4k
:
5k = 54:46, colorless liquid). H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra of the mixture of 4k and 5k have
1
been attached in the Supplementary Materials. 4k: H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3)
δ
2.32–2.36 (m, 5H),
2.67–2.71 (m, 2H), 3.22–3.28 (m, 2H), 5.50–5.60 (2H), 7.01–7.03 (m, 2H), 7.07–7.20 (m, 5H), 7.25–7.29
(m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)
21.0, 34.3, 35.9, 38.6, 125.7, 128.2, 128.3, 128.5, 129.0, 129.8,
δ
130.7, 135.3, 137.8, 140.2, 142.0. The product 5k was characterized by comparison with the previously
reported 1H and 13C{1H} NMR data [34].
The compounds 4k and 5k were synthesized from (3-methoxypent-4-en-1-yl)benzene 2i (174.9 mg,
0.99 mmol) with 3a (1.4 mL, 1.1 M in THF, 1.5 mmol) in the presence of 1b (10.1 mg, 2.5 mol%) in Et2O
(5 mL) at room temperature for 24 h (218.2 mg, 93% yield, 4k:5k = 57:43).
1-Methyl-4-[(3E)-4-phenylbut-3-ene-2-yl]benzene (4l). The compound 4l was synthesized from the
mixture of 1-methoxy-4-{[(3E)-4-phenylbut-3-en-2-yl]oxy}benzene 2j and 1-methoxy-4-{[(2E)-1-
phenylbut-2-en-1-yl]oxy}benzene 2k (254.7 mg, 2j:2k = 67:33, 1.00 mmol) with 3a (1.4 mL, 1.1 M
in THF, 1.5 mmol) in the presence of 1b (10.1 mg, 2.5 mol%) in Et2O (5 mL) at room temperature for
1
24 h (200.2 mg, 90% yield, colorless liquid). H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra of the mixture of 4l and 5l
have been attached in the Supplementary Materials. The product 4l was characterized by comparison
with the previously reported 1H and 13C{1H} NMR data [29].
4. Conclusions
We have described the cross-coupling reaction of allylic aryl ethers with arylmagnesium reagents
catalyzed by nickel(II) pincer complexes 1. Complex 1b bearing a β-aminoketonato unit tethering a
diphenylphosphino group showed excellent catalyst performance. The reactions of a range of cinnamyl
ether derivatives proceeded with high regioselectively to afford solely the linear coupled products
in high yield. The coupling reactions of
linear and branched products. These results indicate that the reaction proceeds via a
α
- and
γ
-alkyl substituted allylic ethers gave a mixture of
-allyl nickel
π
intermediate. Based on stoichiometric reactions, we assumed that an anionic Ni(0) species derived
from the reduction of nickel(II) complex 1b with an excess amount of a Grignard reagent was the active
intermediate in the reaction. Further investigations on mechanistic aspects and the coupling reactions
of various organometallic reagents with organic electrophiles are currently underway in our laboratory.
Supplementary Materials: Supplementary materials including 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra are available online.
Author Contributions: T.H. and Y.Y. conceived and designed the experiments; K.F., A.O., and E.A. performed the
experiments; T.H. and Y.Y. prepared the manuscript; all authors discussed and commented on the manuscript.
Funding: This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI, Grant Numbers 17K05805. This work was also supported
by the Collaborative Research Program of the Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Grant Number
2018-24).
Acknowledgments: We thank Hokko Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. for generous support in supplying
4-fuluorophenylmagnesium bromide.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
De Meijere, A.; Diederich, F. (Eds.) Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2004.
Cheng, Q.; Tu, H.-F.; Zhen, C.; Qu, J.-P.; Helmchen, G.; You, S.-L. Iridium-Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic
Substitution Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 1855–1969. [CrossRef]
Butt, N.A.; Zhang, X. Transition metal-catayzed allylic substitution reactions with unactivated allylic
substrates. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7929–7967. [CrossRef]
Sundararaju, B.; Achard, M.; Bruneau, C. Transition Metal Catalyzed Nucleophilic Allylic Substitution:
activation of allylic alcohols via π-allylic species. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4467–4483. [CrossRef]

Molecules 2019, 24, 2296
11 of 12
5.
6.
7.
Harutyunyan, S.R.; den Hartog, T.; Geurts, K.; Minnaard, A.J.; Feringa, B.L. Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate
Addition and Allylic Alkylation with Grignard Reagents. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2824–2852. [CrossRef]
Alexakis, A.; Bäckvall, J.E.; Krause, N.; P
Addition and Allylic Substitution Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2796–2823. [CrossRef]
rez, M.; Fañan s-Mastral, M.; Hornillos, V.; Rudolph, A.; Bos, P.H.; Harutyunyan, S.R.; Feringa, B.L.
àmies, O.; Diéguez, M. Enantioselective Copper-Catalyzed Conjugate
Pé
á
Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation of Acyclic Allylic Ethers with Organolithium Reagents. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18,
11880–11883. [CrossRef]
8.
9.
Yasui, H.; Mizutani, K.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. Cobalt- and rhodium-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction of
allylic ethers and halides with organometallic reagents. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 1410–1415. [CrossRef]
Gärtner, D.; Konnerth, H.; von Wangelin, A.J. Highly practical iron-catalyzed C–O cleavage reactions. Catal.
Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 2541–2545. [CrossRef]
10. Qi, L.; Ma, E.; Jia, F.; Li, Z. Iron-catalyzed allylic substitution reactions of allylic ethers with Grignard reagents.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 2211–2214. [CrossRef]
11. Ma, E.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Qi, L.; Yan, X.; Li, Z. Salicylate-Directed C O Bond Cleavage: Iron-Catalyzed
−
Allylic Substitution with Grignard Reagents. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2018, 7, 914–917. [CrossRef]
12. Seto, C.; Otsuka, T.; Takeuchi, Y.; Tabuchi, D.; Nagano, T. Iron-Catalyzed Grignard Cross-Couplings with
Allylic Methyl Ethers or Allylic Trimethylsilyl Ethers. Synlett 2018, 29, 1211–1214. [CrossRef]
13. Tao, J.-L.; Yang, B.; Wang, Z.-X. Pincer-Nickel-Catalyzed Allyl-Aryl Coupling between Allyl Methyl Ethers
and Arylzinc Chlorides. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 12627–12634. [CrossRef]
14. Gossage, R.A.; van de Kuil, L.; van Koten, G. Diaminoarylnickel(II) “Pincer” Complexes: Mechanistic
Considerations in the Kharasch Addition Reaction, Controlled Polymerization, and Dendrimeric Transition
Metal Catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 423–431. [CrossRef]
15. Albrecht, M.; van Koten, G. Platinum Group Organometallics Based on “Pincer” Complexes: Sensors,
Switches, and Catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3750–3781. [CrossRef]
16. Van der Boom, M.E.; Milstein, D. Cyclometalated Phosphine-Based Pincer Complexes: Mechanistic Insight
in Catalysis, Coordination, and Bond Activation. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1759–1792. [CrossRef]
17. Nishiyama, H. Synthesis and use of bisoxazolinyl-phenyl pincers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1133–1141.
[CrossRef]
18. Benito-Garagorri, D.; Kirchner, K. Modularly Designed Transition Metal PNP and PCP Pincer Complexes
based on Aminophosphines: Synthesis and Catalytic Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 201–213.
[CrossRef]
19. Wang, Z.-X.; Liu, N. Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling with Pincer Ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012
,
901–911. [CrossRef]
20. Choi, J.; MacArthur, A.H.R.; Brookhart, M.; Goldman, A.S. Dehydrogenation and Related Reactions Catalyzed
by Iridium Pincer Complexes. Chem. Rec. 2011, 111, 1761–1779. [CrossRef]
21. Selander, N.; Szabó, K. Catalysis by Palladium Pincer Complexes. Chem. Rec. 2011, 111, 2048–2076.
22. Niu, J.-L.; Hao, X.-Q.; Gong, J.-F.; Song, M.-P. Symmetrical and unsymmetrical pincer complexes with
group 10 metals: synthesis via aryl C–H activation and some catalytic applications. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40,
5135–5150. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Schneider, S.; Meiners, J.; Askevold, B. Cooperative Aliphatic PNP Amido Pincer Ligands – Versatile Building
Blocks for Coordination Chemistry and Catalysis. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 412–429. [CrossRef]
24. Asay, M.; Morales-Morales, D. Non-symmetric pincer ligands: complexes and applications in catalysis.
Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 17432–17447. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Murugesan, S.; Kirchner, K. Non-precious metal complexes with an anionic PCP pincer architecture. Dalton
Trans. 2016, 45, 416–439. [CrossRef]
26. Asano, E.; Hatayama, Y.; Kurisu, N.; Ohtani, A.; Hashimoto, T.; Kurihara, Y.; Ueda, K.; Ishihara, S.;
Nagano, H.; Yamaguchi, Y. Acetylacetonato-based pincer-type nickel(II) complexes: Synthesis and catalysis
in cross-couplings of aryl chlorides with aryl Grignard reagents. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 8003–8012. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
27. Kurisu, N.; Asano, E.; Hatayama, Y.; Kurihara, Y.; Hashimoto, T.; Funatsu, K.; Ueda, K.; Yamaguchi, Y.
A
β-diketiminato-based pincer-type nickel(II) complex: Synthesis and catalytic performance in the
cross-coupling of aryl fluorides with aryl Grignard reagents. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 126–133. [CrossRef]

Molecules 2019, 24, 2296
12 of 12
28. Yang, B.; Wang, Z.-X. Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of Allyl Alcohols with Aryl- or Alkenylzinc Reagents.
J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 4542–4549. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Jia, X.-G.; Guo, P.; Duan, J.; Shu, X.-Z. Dual nickel and Lewis acid catalysis for cross-electrophile coupling:
the allylation of aryl halides with allylic alcohols. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 640–645. [CrossRef]
30. Cao, H.; Jiang, H.; Feng, H.; Kwan, J.M.C.; Liu, X.; Wu, J. Photo-induced Decarboxylative Heck-Type
Coupling of Unactivated Aliphatic Acids and Terminal Alkenes in the Absence of Sacrificial Hydrogen
Acceptors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 16360–16367. [CrossRef]
31. Nishikata, T.; Lipshutz, B.H. Allylic Ethers as Educts for Suzuki-Miyaura Couplings in Water at Room
Temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12103–12105. [CrossRef]
32. Mino, T.; Kogure, T.; Abe, T.; Koizumi, T.; Fujita, T.; Sakamoto, M. Palladium-Catalyzed Allylic Arylation
of Allylic Ethers with Arylboronic Acids Using Hydrazone Ligands. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 1501–1505.
[CrossRef]
33. Zhang, Y.; Yin, S.-C.; Lu, J.-M. N-Heterocyclic carbene-palladium(II)-1-methylimidazole complex catalyzed
allyl-aryl coupling of allylic alcohols with arylboronic acids in neat water. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 544–549.
[CrossRef]
34. Evans, P.A.; Uraguchi, D. Regio- and Enantiospecific Rhodium-Catalyzed Arylation of Unsymmetrical
Fluorinated Acyclic Allylic Carbonates: Inversion of Absolute Configuration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
7158–7159. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
©
2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).