Counting Monomers in Nanometer-Sized Oligomers
A R T I C L E S
by their hydrodynamic properties.11 First approaches in liquid-
12
and solid-state13 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) are
published. In this study, we show experimentally that also pulsed
electron-electron double resonance (PELDOR)14 can be used
to count the number of interacting monomers in a complex.
PELDOR is a reliable method to measure interspin distances
in the nanometer range15 between nitroxide spin labels16 or
native spin centers in biomolecules.17 Milov, Tsvetkov, et al.
proposed in 1984 that PELDOR can not only be used to measure
spin-spin distances but, in addition, to count the number of
coupled spins from the modulation depth18 and used this to
postulate the aggregation state of small peptides.19 However,
up to now there is no report on the experimental verification of
spin-counting by PELDOR using fully characterized test
systems. Therefore, we describe herein the synthesis of suitable
model systems mimicking different geometries and aggregation
states of biomolecules and use the model systems to evaluate
the method with respect to accuracy and limitations for
biological applications.
Figure 1. Pulse sequences for 4-pulse ELDOR.
meter detector 410 on Macherey-Nagel Nucleosil 50-10 columns.
Elemental analysis was performed on a Foss-Heraeus CHN-O-Rapid.
PELDOR Methodology. All following spin-counting experi-
ments were done with the 4-pulse ELDOR pulse sequence shown in
Figure 1.
The pulses at the detection frequency νA create an echo from the
spins on resonance, named in the following as A spins. Introduction
of an inversion pulse at the pump frequency νB flips spins resonant
with this second frequency, here defined as B spins. Thus, a coupling
ωAB between A and B spins causes a shift in the Lamor frequency of
the A spins by ωAB and therefore a change in the echo signal V(t). The
resulting PELDOR signal (V(t)) can be considered as a product of two
contributions:
Methods and Materials
Synthesis. Coupling reactions and deprotection steps were carried
out applying standard Schlenk techniques under argon atmosphere. All
explicit synthesis procedures are given in the Supporting Information.
Dry toluene was degassed by several freeze-thaw cycles. Benzene was
distilled from sodium metal, and amines were distilled from CaH2 both
under argon atmosphere. Dry DMF was degassed with argon.
Analytic relied on elemental analysis and mass spectrometry such
as EI, ESI, and MALDI. EI mass spectra were recorded on a CH7A
spectrometer from MAT. ESI mass spectra were acquired on a LCQ
Classic spectrometer from Thermo Electron and MALDI mass spectra
on a Voyager DE-Pro or STR spectrometer from Applied Biosystems.
Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of diamagnetic molecules
were acquired at 250 MHz on a Bruker AM-250 spectrometer and
calibrated using residual nondeuterated solvents as internal standard
(δ CHCl3 ) 7.240). IR spectra were recorded on a Jasco FTIR 420
spectrometer using KBr pellets. Analytical HPLC was carried out with
a Waters 590 pump, a Waters UV detector 440, and Waters refracto-
V(t) ) VintraVinter
(1)
V
intra describes all spins coupled in one spin cluster, whereas Vinter takes
into account the signal decay caused by a homogeneous distribution
of the clusters in the sample. Assuming that the spin-orientations are
not changed because of spin diffusion or spin-lattice relaxation, Vintra
can be described by eq 2.18
n
n
1
V(t)intra
)
(1 - λB(1 - cos(ωABt)))
(2)
∑ ∏
A)1 B)1
B*A
n
with
and
ωAB ) ωdd + 2πJAB
(3)
(4)
(9) (a) Heinze, K. G.; Jahnz, M.; Schwille, P. Biophys. J. 2004, 86, 506. (b)
Becker, C. F. W.; Seidel, R.; Jahnz, M.; Bacia, K.; Niederhausen, T.;
Alexandrov, K.; Schwille, P.; Goody, R. S.; Engelhard, M. Chem. Bio.
Chem. 2006, 7, 891.
µ0p γAγB
3 (3 cos2 θ - 1)
ωdd ) -
4π
rAB
(10) (a) Liu, J.; Lu, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 15208. (b) Watrob, H.
M.; Pan, C.-P.; Barkley, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7336.
(11) (a) Nag, N.; Krishnamoorthy, G.; Rao, B. J. FEBS J. 2005, 272, 6228. (b)
Chugh, J.; Chatterjee, A.; Kumar, A.; Mishra, R. K.; Mittal, R.; Hosur, R.
V. FEBS J. 2006, 273, 388. (c) Cramer, J.; Jaeger, J.; Restle, T. Biochemistry
2006, 45, 3610.
where n is the number of radicals per cluster, λB is the fraction of B
spins inverted by the pump pulse, t is the time delay of the pump pulse,
ωdd is the full dipole-dipole splitting, µ0 is the vacuum permeability,
γ are the magnetogyric ratios of the spins, p is the Planck constant
divided by 2π, rAB is the distance between the spins, θ is the angle
between rAB and the external magnetic field, JAB is the exchange
(12) Krishnan, V. V. J. Magn. Reson. 1997, 124, 468.
(13) Luo, W.; Hong, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7242.
(14) Milov, A. D.; Salikov, K. M.; Shirov, M. D. Fiz. TVerd. Tela 1981, 23,
975.
(15) (a) Larsen, R. G.; Singel, D. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5134. (b) Martin,
R. E.; Pannier, M.; Diederich, F.; Gramlich, V.; Hubrich, M.; Spiess, H.
W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2833.
(16) (a) Jeschke, G. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2002, 23, 227. (b) Schiemann,
O.; Weber, A.; Edwards, T. E.; Prisner, T. F.; Sigurdsson, S. T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3434. (c) Schiemann, O.; Piton, N.; Mu, Y.; Stock,
G.; Engels, J. W.; Prisner, T. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5722. (d)
Zhou, Z.; DeSensi, S. C.; Stein, R. A.; Brandon, S.; Dixit, M.; McArdle,
E. J.; Warren, E. M.; Kroh, H. K.; Song, L.; Cobb, C. E.; Hustedt, E. J.;
Beth, A. E. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 15115.
(17) (a) Bennati, M.; Robblee, J. H.; Mugnaini, V.; Stubbe, J.; Freed, J. H.;
Borbat, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15014. (b) Kay, C. W. M.; Elsa¨sser,
C.; Bittl, R.; Farell, S. R.; Thorpe, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 76. (c)
Elsa¨sser, C.; Brecht, M.; Bittl, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12606. (d)
Hara, H.; Kawamori, A.; Astashkin, A. V.; Ono, T.-A. Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 1996, 1276, 140.
coupling in units of Hz, and ... is the averaging over values of rAB
AB, and θ. We assume JAB to be negligible versus ωdd and also that
the radical centers in a cluster do not bear any angular correlation.
,
J
Considering a random distribution of clusters and neglecting excluded
volumes, Vinter can be written as eq 5.20
2πγAγBµ
V(t)inter ) exp -
0cλBt
(5)
(
)
x
3p
9
Here c is the radical concentration in m-3
.
Thus, the coupling between spins can be deduced parameter-free
from the time domain signal by division of V(t) by Vinter and cosine
Fourier transformation. In disordered samples a broad distribution of
(18) (a) Milov, A. D.; Ponomarev, A. B.; Tsvetkov, Y. D. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1984, 110, 67. (b) Milov, A. D.; Maryasov, A. G.; Tsvetkov, Y. D. Appl.
Magn. Reson. 1998, 15, 107.
(19) Milov, A. D.; Tsvetkov, Y. D.; Formaggio, F.; Crisma, M.; Toniolo, C.;
Raap, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3843.
(20) Mims, W. B. In Electron Paramagnetic Resonance; Geschwind, S., Ed.;
Plenum: New York, 1972; pp 263.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 21, 2007 6737