3256
G. Zhao et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 3254–3257
Table 2. SAR of 5-substituted thienopyridones
2-chlorinated analogs could also be prepared by the
treatment of analogs 1 and6 with N-chlorosuccinimide,
although the yields in this transformation were low
(30%). The 2-brominated analogs were prepared in a
straightforward manner by the treatment of analogs 1
or 8 with NBS, affording the desired products in about
60% yield.
OH
R
S
N
O
H
a
Compound
R
AMPK Rat liver EC50 (lM)
Evaluation of these analogs in our binding assay re-
vealed that functionalization with electron withdrawing
groups at the 2-position significantly improved AMPK
activation. As demonstrated in Table 1, analogs 14
and 15 had EC50 values of 3.7 and 5.8 lM, respectively.
Compound 16, the 2-chloro-substituted analog of 6,
showed a tenfold improvement in activity relative to
the parent analog. This trend was further present in ana-
log 17. In contrast, incorporation of larger electron-
withdrawing groups, such the nitro moiety present in
18,8 resulted in a loss of potency. The same result was
observed with the phenyl-substituted compound 19.9
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Ph
Inactive
180
183
3-OMe-C6H4
2-Thiophene
–COOMe
–NMe2
Cl
175
Inactive
88
Inactive
H
a All compounds were >95% pure by HPLC and characterized by 1H
NMR and HRMS. Values represent an average of at least two
determinations.
We next evaluated the requirement of the hydroxyl moi-
ety on the thienopyridone core. To this end, the chemi-
cal reactivity of the acidic-OH and -NH were
investigated. While basic alkylation conditions (sodium
hydride, methyl iodide) exclusively afforded N-alkylated
products, O-alkylation required more neutral conditions
(CH2N2) for an efficient and selective transformation
(Scheme 2). Finally, the amino analog 24 was prepared
in an analogous manner to 1 (see Scheme 3). However,
all of these modifications proved unproductive, as ana-
logs 20–24 were inactive against rat liver AMPK.
As shown in Table 2, only the chloride substituent could
effectively replace the cyano group in the pyridone ring
of 1 (analog 30). Other substitutions resulted in a dimi-
nution or complete loss of AMPK activity up to the con-
centrations tested.
The systematic investigation of the HTS lead structure 1
identified several productive areas for optimization. Spe-
cifically, 3-phenyl ortho-substitution led to improve-
ments as much as tenfold, while 2-substitution
afforded analogs with improvements over fortyfold.
Subsequent reports will disclose further optimization
of these analogs, as well as their evaluation in in vivo
models of glucose lowering.
Our final exploration was directed towards replacement
of the 5-cyano functionality on the pyridone ring. As
shown in Scheme 3, this was achieved analogously to 1
by switching from cyanoacetyl chloride to various
substituted acyl chlorides in the coupling step prior to
cyclization. Our attempts to generate the 5-carboxylic
acid analogs were unsuccessful, as the attempted hydro-
lysis of the nitrile under acidic conditions only afforded
the corresponding decarboxylated product 31.
References and notes
1. (a) Hardie, D. G. Endocrinology 2003, 144, 5179; (b)
Hardie, D. G.; Scott, J. W.; Pan, D. A.; Hudson, E. R.
FEBS Lett. 2003, 546, 113; (c) Kahn, B. B.; Alquier, T.;
Carling, D.; Hardie, D. G. Cell Metab. 2005, 1, 15; (d)
Hawley, S. A.; Boudeau, J.; Reid, J. L.; Mustard, K. J.;
Udd, L.; Makela, T. P.; Alessi, D. R.; Hardie, D. G. J. Biol.
2003, 2, 28.
Br
Br
2. (a) Carling, D.; Zammit, V. A.; Hardie, D. G. FEBS Lett.
1987, 223, 217; (b) McGarry, J. D.; Brown, N. F. Eur. J.
Biochem. 1997, 244, 1; (c) Saha, A. K.; Schwarsin, A. J.;
Roduit, R.; Masse, F.; Kaushik, V.; Tornheim, K.; Prentki,
M.; Ruderman, N. B. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 24279; (d)
Hardie, D. G.; Hawley, S. A. Bioessays 2001, 23, 1112.
3. (a) Winder, W. W.; Hardie, D. G. Am. J. Physiol. 1999,
277, E1; (b) Moller, D. E.; Kaufman, K. D. Annu. Rev.
Med. 2005, 56, 45; (c) Schimmack, G.; DeFronzo, R. A.;
Musi, N. Diab. Obes. Metab. 2006, 8, 591.
4. (a) Vincent, M. F.; Erion, M. D.; Gruber, H. E.; van den
Berghe, G. Diabetologia 1996, 39, 1148; (b) Young, M. E.;
Radda, G. K.; Leighton, B. FEBS Lett. 1996, 382, 43; (c)
Fryer, L. G.; Parbu-Patel, A.; Carling, D. J. Biol. Chem.
2002, 277, 25226; (d) Zou, M. H.; Kirkpatrick, S. S.; Davis,
B. J.; Nelson, J. S.; Wiles, I. W.; Schlettner, U.; Neumann,
D.; Brownlee, M.; Freeman, M. B.; Goldman, M. H.
J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 43940.
NH2
CN
NH2
CN
O
a,b
S
N
S
H
24
OH
COOEt
NH
c
R
O
S
S
O
N
H
25-33
R
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) CH2(CN)CO2H, PCl5, Et3N,
DCM (90%); (b) NaOEt, EtOH, reflux (43%); (c) NaH, THF, reflux or
KHMDS, THF, PhCH3, 0 °C–rt, (20–70%).