C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 3. Site Differentiation Using the Isotope Effect.
modulated lability has already been successfully applied in solid-
phase peptide synthesis.19,20
These experiments show unambiguously that the successful use
of the KIE in classical organic synthesis can also be extended to
photochemical reactions and that careful selection of the irradiation
wavelength is an additional handle to control the outcome of a
reaction. We also established experimental evidence for the
importance of higher excited states in an apparently well-understood
reaction. This is of highest importance for the development of
wavelength-selective photochemical reactions, where the kinetic and
spectroscopic parameters need to be optimized separately. Further
studies in the exact mechanism by flash photolysis and in the
synthetic applications are currently underway.
Table 1. Wavelength-Dependence of the Isotope Effect
λ
kH/kD 1a/2a
kH/kD 1b/2b
kH/kD 1c/2c
kH/kD 1d/2d
254
350
420
3.8
5.8
8.3
3.0
3.0
3.3
3.1
4.2
4.3
3.6
4.2
4.1
Acknowledgment. The financial support of the Swiss National
Science Foundation (Grant 620-066063) is gratefully acknowledged.
Supporting Information Available: Selected experimental pro-
cedures and isotope effect measurements, equations used to calculate
the KIE, and UV spectra of 1a/2a (PDF). This material is available
and 1d/2d. A comparison of superimposable UV-vis spectra for
the protic and deuterated series rules out differential absorption.16
These results could suggest that the position of the transition
state or the conical intersection along the reaction coordinates and/
or the activation energy is wavelength-dependent. This explanation
is not reasonable, since the wavelength of the incident light is an
external factor, which should alter neither the molecular shape nor
the properties. On the other hand, one could consider that seVeral
energy surfaces are involved. However, photochemical and pho-
tophysical (e.g., fluorescence) processes usually occur from the first
excited state (either singlet S1 or triplet T1), regardless of the initial
excitation. This is known as the Kasha rule and is the consequence
of very fast internal conversion. The implication of a higher excited
state would represent a violation of this rule.17
References
(1) Wiberg, K. B. Chem. ReV. 1955, 55, 713-743. Westheimer, F. H. Chem.
ReV. 1961, 61, 265-273. Kwart, H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15, 401-
408.
(2) Clive, D. L. J.; Tao, Y.; Khodabocus, A.; Wu, Y. J.; Angoh, A. G.; Bennett,
S. M.; Boddy, C. N.; Bordeleau, L.; Kellner, D.; Kleiner, G.; Middleton,
D. S.; Nichols, C. J.; Richardson, S. R.; Vernon, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 11275-11286.
(3) Clayden, J.; Pink, J. H.; Westlund, N. F.; Wilson, X. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 8377-8380.
(4) Pippel, P. J.; Weisenburger, G. A.; Faibish, N. C.; Beak, P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 4919-4927.
(5) Hoppe, D.; Paetow, M.; Hintze, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993,
32, 394-396.
Irradiation at 420 nm furnishes just enough energy to reach the
S1 state, from which the reaction occurs with an intrinsically large
kinetic isotope effect. Excitation at 254 nm populates a higher
energy surface (S2), where the shape of the energy surface state is
different and shows a smaller KIE. This would be possible only if
the chemical reaction is faster than the relaxation. This hypothesis
is in agreement with the quasi-absence of wavelength-dependence
for the series b, where excited states are significantly lower (as
(6) Vedejs, E.; Little, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 748-749.
(7) Bochet, C. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6341-6346.
(8) (a) Blanc, A.; Bochet, C. G. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 5567-5577. (b)
Bochet, C. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2071-2073.
(9) Patchornik, A.; Amit, B.; Woodward, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92,
6333-6335. See also ref 15.
(10) Reichmanis, E.; Smith, B. C.; Gooden, R. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem.
Ed. 1985, 23, 1-8.
(11) (a) Schwo¨rer, M.; Wirz, J. HelV. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 1441-1458. (b)
Il’Ichev, Y. V.; Wirz, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 7856-7870. (c)
Gravel, D.; Giasson, R.; Blanchet, D.; Yip, R. W.; Sharma, D. K. Can. J.
Chem. 1991, 69, 1193-1200. (d) Yip, R. W.; Sharma, D. K.; Giasson,
R.; Gravel, D. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 5770-5772. (e) Yip, R. W.;
Sharma, D. K.; Giasson, R.; Gravel, D. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 5328-
5330. (f) Yip, R. W.; Wen, Y. X.; Gravel, D.; Giasson, R.; Sharma, D.
K. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 6078-6081.
(12) Balavoine, G.; Moradpour, A.; Kagan, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974,
96, 5152-5158. The KIE was calculated from a measurement at low
conversion (<15%) using an equation based on first-order kinetics. See
Supporting Information.
shown by the UV-vis spectra, 1a λmax ) 258 nm and 1b λmax
)
346 nm) and that the S2 state (with low KIE) can be reached even
at 420 nm. The implication of the S2 state is also compatible with
a triplet-based scheme, where the S2-T1 intersystem crossing is
much faster than the S1-T1 transition, according to the El-Sayed
selection rules.18 If this mechanism operates, our experimental evi-
dence suggests that the singlet-based transition state presents a large
KIE, whereas the triplet-based transition state shows a smaller one.
This particularly strong isotope effect opens new perspectives
in wavelength-based protecting group differentiation. To verify this,
we prepared diesters 3a and 3b, where both termini are protected
by ortho-nitrobenzyl alcohol derivatives. Chromatic orthogonality
was shown earlier to be rather poor (3.8:1 at 254 nm and 1:1.5 at
420 nm) for the hydrogen-substituted variant.7 Upon isotopic
substitution at the benzylic center, we expected the differentiation
to be significantly higher on the basis of the above results.
Hence, as a negative control, the photolysis of 3a at 420 nm
gave only a 2.4:1 ratio of monoesters 4a and 5a (37 and 15% yields,
respectively), together with 33% yield of totally deprotected
pentanedioic acid 6 and 15% yield of starting material (Scheme
3). On the other hand, in the isotopically substituted substrate, the
selectivity was raised to 14:1 (70% yield of 4b and 5% yield of
5b), with only 8% yield of totally deprotected 6 and 17% yield of
starting material. Subsequent photolysis of 4b at a shorter wave-
length would continue the deprotection to 6. A wavelength-based,
(13) Jones, R. A. Y. Physical and Mechanistic Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed.;
Cambridge University Press: New York, 1984; pp 29-37.
(14) Kwart, H. M.; Brechbiel, W. R.; Acheson, M.; Ward, D. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1982, 104, 4671-4672.
(15) Corrie, J. E. T.; Barth, A.; Munasinghe, V. R. N.; Trentham, D. R.; Hutter,
M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8546-8554. See also: Il’ichev, Y.
V.; Schworer, M. A.; Wirz, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4581-4595.
(16) Temperature of the reaction mixture increases slightly over the time, but
measurements between 5 and 30 min showed no variation in the KIE.
(17) Only in rare cases, when the higher excited states (S2, S3, ...) are sufficiently
distant from S1, is internal conversion inefficient and do reactions from
these states occur (among the famous examples are the naphthalene
fluorescence and the Norrish type I reaction of thioketones). For a
discussion, see: Turro, N. J.; Ramamurthy, V.; Cherry, W.; Farneth W.
Chem. ReV. 1978, 78, 125-145.
(18) Klessinger, M.; Michl, J. Excited States and Photochemistry of Organic
Molecules; VCH: New York, 1995; p 255. See also: Lower, S. K.; El-
Sayed, M. A. Chem. ReV. 1966, 66, 199-241.
(19) Ladlow, M.; Legge, C. H.; Neudeck, T.; Pipe, A. J.; Sheppard, T.; Yang,
L. L. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2048-2049
(20) Kessler, M.; Glatthar, R.; Giese, B.; Bochet, C. G. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
1179-1182.
JA049686B
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 23, 2004 7175