1024
T. Matsumoto et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 695 (2010) 1019–1025
mixture was stirred for 10 h. After the solvent was removed under
reduced pressure, insoluble inorganic salts were removed by filtra-
tion through CeliteÒ with benzene. After the solvent of the filtrate
was removed, the residue was washed with hexane to afford 2b
(15 mg, 0.018 mmol, 26% from 3b). 2b: orange crystals, m.p.
130–131 °C (decomp.); 1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6, 298 K) d 0.17 (s,
18H), 0.20 (s, 18H), 0.29 (br, 18H), 1.48 (s, 1H), 1.88 (m, 2H),
2.03 (m, 2H), 2.07 (d, 3H), 2.30 (m, 2H), 2.47 (m, 2H), 3.13 (s,
1H), 3.25 (br, 1H), 4.16 (m, 2H), 5.48 (m, 2H), 6.28 (dd, 3JHH = 10 Hz,
4.10. Thermolysis of rhodium complex 2b in the presence of
norbornadiene
To a C6D6 solution (0.7 mL) of 2b (6.9 mg, 8.0
lmol) in a 5u
NMR tube was added norbornadiene (8.1 L, 0.080 mmol). The
l
reaction mixture was degassed and sealed in the NMR tube. After
heating at 40 °C for 5 h, the starting material was found to disap-
pear as judged by the 1H NMR spectrum. The NMR tube was
opened in a glove box filled with argon gas, and the solvent and
dienes were removed under reduced pressure to afford 9 (6.6 mg,
2
3JPH = 28 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (s, 1H), 6.71 (s, 1H), 8.23 (dd, JPH = 13 Hz,
3JHH = 10 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, C6D6, 298 K) d 1.0 (CH3)
1.4 (CH3), 1.8 (CH3), 28.3 (CH2), 28.7 (d, J = 4 Hz, CH3), 30.1
(CH), 30.3 (CH), 31.0 (CH), 33.4 (d, J = 4 Hz, CH), 64.4 (d, J = 14 Hz,
CH), 95.7 (dd, J = 9, 13 Hz, CH), 107.9 (d, J = 4 Hz, CH), 122.5
(CH), 127.3 (CH), 145.1 (C), 151.1 (C), 160.1 (d, J = 18 Hz, CH),
173.0 (d, J = 23 Hz, C); 31P{1H} NMR (120 MHz, C6D6, 298 K)
7.4 l
mol, 97%). 9: orange crystals, m.p. 211–212 °C (decomp.); 1H
NMR (300 MHz, C6D6, 298 K) d 0.17 (s, 18H), 0.20 (s, 18H), 0.28
(br, 18H), 1.12 (m, 1H), 1.24 (m, 1H), 1.47 (s, 1H), 2.11 (d, 3H),
3.24 (brs, 1H), 3.37 (brs, 1H), 3.51 (brs, 2H), 4.06 (m, 2H), 4.98
3
3
(m, 2H), 6.33 (dd, JHH = 10 Hz, JPH = 28 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (br, 1H),
6.69 (s, 1H), 8.22 (dd, 2J = 14 Hz, 3J = 10 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR
(75 MHz, C6D6, 298 K) d 1.5 (CH3) 2.0 (CH3), 2.1 (CH3), 29.1 (d,
J = 6 Hz, CH3), 30.9 (CH), 31.5 (CH), 46.1 (d, J = 11 Hz, CH), 50.1 (s,
CH), 62.9 (s, CH2),74.8 (dd, J = 7, 12 Hz, CH), 109.0 (s, CH), 122.9
(CH), 127.6 (CH), 145.5 (C), 151.0 (C), 159.7 (d, J = 16 Hz, CH),
174.4 (d, J = 22 Hz, C); 31P{1H} NMR (120 MHz, C6D6, 298 K) d
1
d 120 (d, JPRh = 175 Hz). High-resolution MS (FAB) m/z Calc.
for C39H77OPRhSi6 863.3383. Found: 863.3372 ([M+H]+). Anal.
Calc. for C39H76OPRhSi6: C, 54.25; H, 8.87. Found: C, 54.26; H,
8.95%.
1
133 (d, JPRh = 197 Hz). LRMS (ESI, negative): m/z 831, Calc. for
4.8. Synthesis of rhodium complex 7
C37H69OPRhSi6 831 ([MꢀMe]ꢀ). Since it was difficult to obtain a
satisfactory result for the elemental analysis of 9 due to the extre-
mely high air-, moisture-, and light-sensitivity, the purity was con-
firmed by the 1H NMR spectrum.
To
(150 mg, 0.578 mmol) was added n-butyl lithium (1.51 M hexane
solution, 463 L, 0.694 mmol) at 0 °C. After the reaction mixture
a diethylether solution (20 mL) of b-enaminoketone 5
l
was stirred at 0 °C for 15 min, [RhCl(cod)]2 (142 mg, 0.289 mmol)
was added. After stirring for 2 h, the solvent was removed under
reduced pressure. The residue was washed with hexane to afford
7 (89 mg, 0.19 mmol, 33%). 7: orange crystals; m.p. 167 °C (de-
5. X-ray crystallographic analysis of 2b, 3a,
[4aꢁ(OEt2)]2ꢁ(0.5hexane) and 7
The intensity data were collected on a RIGAKU Saturn70 CCD
3
comp.); 1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6, 298 K) d 1.01 (d, JHH = 7 Hz,
(system) with VariMax Mo Optic using Mo
(k = 0.71070 Å) for 2b, and on a Rigaku/MSC Mercury CCD diffrac-
tometer with graphite monochromated Mo radiation
Ka radiation
3
6H) 1.37 (d, JHH = 7 Hz, 6H), 1.51 (s, 3H), 1.54 (m, 2H), 1.66 (m,
2H), 2.01 (s, 3H), 2.24 (m, 4H) 2.90 (m, 2H), 3.46 (sept, 3JHH = 7 Hz,
2H), 4.74 (m, 2H), 5.08 (s, 1H), 7.04 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz,
C6D6, 298 K); d 24.0 (CH3), 25.0 (CH3), 25.2 (CH3), 26.6 (CH3), 28.1
Ka
(k = 0.71070 Å) for 3a, [4aꢁ(OEt2)]2ꢁ(0.5hexane) and 7. Single crys-
tals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by slow recrystalliza-
tion from THF/benzene (for 2b), hexane (for 3a), Et2O/hexane (for
[4aꢁ(OEt2)]2ꢁ(0.5hexane)) and benzene (for 7). The single crystals
were mounted on a glass fiber. The structures were solved by a di-
rect method (SHELXS-97) [20] and refined by full-matrix least-
squares procedures on F2 for all reflections (SHELXL-97) [21]. All
hydrogen atoms were placed using AFIX instructions, while all
other atoms were refined anisotropically.
1
(CH), 29.3 (CH2), 31.7 (CH2), 76.0 (d, JRhC = 14 Hz, CH), 81.6 (d,
1JRhC = 12 Hz, CH), 97.7 (CH), 124.0 (CH), 126.0 (CH), 141.2 (C),
146.1 (C), 165.2 (C), 177.7 (C). High-resolution MS (FAB) m/z Calc.
for C25H36ONRh 469.1852. Found: 469.1854 ([M]+). Anal. Calc. for
C25H36ONRh: C, 63.96; H, 7.73; N 2.98. Found: C, 63.91; H, 7.77;
N 3.03%.
Crystal data for 2b: C39H76OPRhSi6, M = 863.42, T = 103(2) K, tri-
ꢀ
4.9. Synthesis of iridium complex 8b
clinic, P1 (no. 2), a = 10.0909(2) Å, b = 11.1677(2) Å, c = 22.2560(4)
Å,
a
= 102.3125(13)°, b = 90.6913(8)°,
c
l
= 104.4184(10)°, V =
To a THF solution (25 mL) of [4aꢁ(OEt2)]2 (172 mg, 0.10 mmol)
was added [IrCl(cod)]2 (70 mg, 0.10 mmol) at room temperature.
The reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 10 h. After the solvent
was removed under reduced pressure, benzene was added to the
crude product. Then, the suspension was filtered through CeliteÒ.
After the solvent of the filtrate was removed, the residue was
washed with hexane to afford iridium complex 8b (188 mg,
0.094 mmol, 94%). 8b: orange crystals, m.p. 170–171 °C (decomp.);
1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6, 298 K) d 0.17 (s, 18H), 0.18 (s, 18H), 0.29
(br, 18H), 1.49 (s, 1H), 1.86 (m, 2H), 2.01 (m, 2H), 2.06 (d, 3H), 2.23
(m, 2H), 2.38 (m, 2H), 3.07 (br, 1H), 3.19 (br, 1H), 4.02 (m, 2H), 5.20
(m, 2H), 6.44 (dd, J = 11, 29 Hz, 1H), 6.60 (br, 1H), 6.73 (br, 1H),
2367.57(8) Å3, Z = 2, Dcalc = 1.211 g cmꢀ3
,
= 0.573 mmꢀ1, 2hmax
=
51.0, 25 098 measured reflections, 8695 independent reflections
(Rint = 0.0254), 637 refined parameters, GOF = 1.107, R1 = 0.0396
and wR2 = 0.0926 [I > 2r(I)], R1 = 0. 0441 and wR2 = 0.0950 [for all
data], largest diff. peak and hole 0.980 and ꢀ0.710 e Åꢀ3
.
Crystal data for 3a: C34H73OPSi7, M = 725.5, T = 103(2) K, mono-
ꢀ
clinic, triclinic, P1 (no. 2), a = 12.374(5) Å, b = 12.978(5) Å,
c = 16.641(6) Å,
a
= 94.725(3)°, b = 104.348(3)°,
c
l
= 116.225(3)°,
V = 2265.2(15) Å3, Z = 2, Dcalc = 1.064 g cmꢀ3
,
= 0.269 mmꢀ1
,
2hmax = 50.0, 22 030 measured reflections, 7965 independent
reflections (Rint = 0.0419), 414 refined parameters, GOF = 1.090,
R1 = 0.0556 and wR2 = 0.1237 [I > 2r(I)], R1 = 0.0721 and
8.58 (dd, JPH = 12 Hz, JHH = 11 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz,
C6D6, 298 K) d 0.7 (CH3), 1.0 (CH3), 1.4 (CH3), 1.6 (CH3), 1.8 (CH3),
28.8 (CH2), 28.9 (d, J = 4 Hz, CH3), 30.2 (CH), 31.1 (CH), 32.0 (CH),
34.3 (d, J = 4 Hz, CH), 48.1 (s, CH), 82.3 (d, J = 16 Hz, CH), 109.6 (s,
CH), 122.6 (CH), 126.8 (CH), 145.8 (C), 150.9 (C), 156.3 (d,
J = 31 Hz, CH), 173.2 (d, J = 23 Hz, C); 31P{1H} NMR (120 MHz,
C6D6, 298 K) d 121. High-resolution MS (FAB) Calc. for C39H76OSi6-
P193Ir 952.3879. Found: 952.3857 ([M]+).
wR2 = 0.1326 [for all data], largest difference in peak and hole
2
3
0.782 and ꢀ0.273 e Åꢀ3
.
Crystal data for [4aꢁ(OEt2)]2ꢁ(0.5hexane): C41H89LiO2PSi7,
M = 848.66, T = 103(2) K, monoclinic, P21/a (no. 14), a =
25.4620(4) Å, b = 12.3405(2) Å, c = 36.7695(6) Å, b = 107.1418(7)°,
V = 11040.3(3) Å3, Z = 8, Dcalc = 1.021 g cmꢀ3
, l ,
= 0.230 mmꢀ1
2hmax = 50.0, 92 054 measured reflections, 19 339 independent
reflections (Rint = 0.0705), 987 refined parameters, GOF = 1.091,