114 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 65, No. 1, 2000
Baik et al.
Ta ble 6. Sta biliza tion En er gies of p-Ben zoqu in on e Meth id es Ca lcu la ted a t th e B3LYP /6-31G*//B3LYP /6-31G* Levela
3 (R1, R2)
BM
ethane
phenol
ethene
SEb (kcal/mol)
3a , (t-Bu, t-Bu)
3e, (Me, Me)
3f, (t-Bu, H)
3h , (H, H)
-660.052585
-424.020497
-502.796942
-345.432362
-79.830417
-79.830417
-79.830417
-79.830417
-661.279322
-425.413180
-504.032136
-346.776027
-78.587456
-78.587456
-78.587456
-78.587456
+10.18
+7.65
+4.87
+4.09
a
b
Energies in hartrees were uncorrected for zero-point energy. The stabilization energy SE ) Ephenol + Eethene - EBM - Eethane in
kcal/mol.
3,5-Di-ter t-bu tyl-4-h yd r oxyben za ld eh yd e (2a ): mp 179-
benzoquinone methides 3a and 3e, compared to 3f and
3h , can explain the conjugation effects. In particular, di-
tert-butylbenzoquinone methide 3a displays a symmetri-
cally bisected geometry without distortion, and thus it
gives an unusually higher stabilization energy. The
relatively high stabilization energies for 3a and 3e are
consistent with the experimental results that the forma-
tion of p-benzoquinone methide with NBS is predomi-
nant.
1
181 °C (lit.24a 178-181 °C); H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.41 (s, 18H),
5.77 (s, 1H), 7.66 (s, 2H), 9.79 (s, 1H); LRMS (EI) m/z 234 (M+).
3,5-Dim eth oxy-4-h yd r oxyben za ld eh yd e (Syr in ga ld e-
h yd e) (2b): mp 110-111 °C (lit.24b 111-112 °C); 1H NMR
(CDCl3) δ 3.89 (s, 6H), 6.16 (s, 1H), 7.19 (s, 2H), 10.18 (s, 1H);
LRMS (EI) m/z 182 (M+).
3,5-Dip h en yl-4-h yd r oxyben za ld eh yd e (2c): mp 167-168
°C (lit.24c 168-170 °C); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 5.96 (s, 1H), 7.40-
7.55 (m, 10H), 7.81 (s, 2H), 9.94 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ
128.4, 129.1, 129.2, 129.5, 129.9, 131.8, 136.1, 154.8, 190.9;
LRMS (EI) m/z 274 (M+).
Su m m a r y
3,5-Diisop r op yl-4-h yd r oxyben za ld eh yd e (2d ): mp 103-
1
105 °C (lit.24d 106-108 °C); H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.30 (d, J )
We examined the NBS oxidation of symmetrically
hindered alkylphenols to afford a p-benzoquinone meth-
ide 3 under mild conditions. Trapping of the electrophilic
exocyclic alkylidene in 3 by DMSO provides an efficient
route to formylphenols. This oxidation reaction is strongly
activated by the generation of more electrophilic methine
by the addition of bromodimethylsulfonium bromide to
3. Strikingly, the side-chain halogenation reaction of
symmetrically hindered alkylphenols does not occur with
NBS under free-radical conditions. However, when un-
symmetrically hindered methylphenols or p-cresol were
allowed to react with NBS in DMSO, the nuclear bromi-
nation process was predominant. Some attempts were
made to take advantage of the electrophilic and double
bond characters of benzoquinone methide that would
indicate its intermediacy in the NBS-promoted reaction.
First, the electrophilic substitution reaction of moderately
activated anisoles provided p-hydroxybenzylated ani-
soles in good yields. Second, the [4 + 2] cycloaddition
reaction with diene also proceeded to give reasonable
yields. In addition, the ab initio calculations show that
the relative stabilization energies of the symmetrically
hindered benzoquinone methides account for their
stability.
6.7 Hz, 12 H), 3.23 (m, 2H), 6.14 (s, 1H), 7.64 (s, 2H), 9.85 (s,
1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 22.50, 26.96, 126.26, 129.46, 134.56,
156.26, 192. 01; LRMS (EI) m/z 206 (M+).
3,5-Dim eth yl-4-h yd r oxyben za ld eh yd e (2e): mp 111-113
1
°C (lit.24e 111-112 °C); H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.24 (s, 6H), 5.68
(s, 1H), 7.47 (s, 2H), 9.73 (s, 1H); LRMS (EI) m/z 150 (M+).
3,5-Di-ter t-bu tyl-2-h yd r oxyben za ld eh yd e (13): mp 54-
1
57 °C (lit.16 53-56 °C); H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.25 (s, 9H), 1.34
(s, 9H), 7.27 (s, 1H), 7.51 (s, 1H), 9.79 (s, 1H), 11.66 (s, 1H);
LRMS (EI) m/z 234 (M + 1).
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e Ar yla tion w ith 2,6-Di-ter t-
bu tyl-4-m eth ylp h en ol. NBS (1.331 g, 7.5 mmol) was added
to a mixture of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (1.101 g, 5
mmol), anisole (2.717 mL, 25 mmol), and ZnCl2 (0.681 g, 5
mmol) in CCl4 (30 mL). The reaction mixture was heated at
120 °C for the time given in Table 4. After the reaction was
completed, brine solution and methylene chloride were poured
into the flask. The separated organic layer was washed with
water and dried over magnesium sulfate. The solvent was
removed in vacuo, and the residue was chromatographed with
hexanes-ethyl acetate (9:1) to give the product 15.
2,6-Di-t er t -b u t yl-4-[(4′-m e t h oxyp h e n yl)m e t h yl]p h e -
n ol (pa r a p r od u ct):9 mp 136-137 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.33
(s, 18H), 3.70 (s, 3H), 3.73 (s, 2H), 4.97 (s, 1H), 6.75 (d, J )
8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.90 (s, 2H), 7.04 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR
(CDCl3) δ 30.6, 34.6, 41.2, 55.5, 114.0, 125.6, 130.0, 132.3,
134.2, 136.1, 152.2, 158.1 ppm; LRMS (EI) m/z 326 (M+);
HRMS calcd for C22H30O2 326.2246, found 326.2237.
2,6-Di-ter t-bu tyl-4-[(2′-m eth oxy-5′m eth ylp h en yl)m eth -
yl]p h en ol:9 oil; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.32 (s, 18H), 3.80 (s, 2H),
4.59 (s, 1H), 5.02 (s, 1H), 6.65 (m, 1H), 6.85 (m, 2H), 6.98 (s,
2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 19.5, 29.3, 33.3, 35.5, 114.6, 124.1,
126.0, 127.0, 128.9, 130.4, 135.2, 150.7, 151.4; MS (EI) 326
(M+); HRMS calcd for C22H30O2 326.2246, found 326.2246.
2,6-Di-ter t-Bu tyl-4-[(4′-m eth oxy-3′,5′-d im eth ylp h en yl)-
m eth yl]p h en ol: mp 92-94 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.33 (s,
18H), 2.16 (s, 6H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.69 (s, 2H), 4.97 (s, 1H), 6.76
(s, 2H), 6.91 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 16.1, 30.3, 34.3, 41.2,
59.6, 125.3, 129.1, 130.5, 131.8, 135.7, 137.0, 152.0, 155.1;
LRMS (EI) m/z 354 (M+); HRMS calcd for C24H34O2 354.2558,
found 354.2550.
Exp er im en ta l Section
1H NMR spectra were recorded on a 300 MHz spectrometer
in CDCl3 solution. Mass spectra were obtained at a 70 eV via
GC-MS coupling. GC analyses were performed using a
capillary column (25 m × 0.2 mm i.d.). Melting points were
determined on a Mel-Temp II apparatus and were uncorrected.
3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzyl bromide3b was prepared from
3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol and HBr gas accord-
ing to the published procedure. The known products (2a -e,
11, a n d 16) were identical in all respects (mp, IR, MS, and
NMR) with those previously reported.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e Oxid a tion of 2,6-Di-ter t-
bu tyl-4-m eth ylp h en ol. NBS (0.213 g, 1.2 mmol) was added
to a solution of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (0.220 g, 1.0
mmol) in DMSO (10 mL). The reaction mixture was heated at
120 °C for the time given in Table 2. After the reaction was
completed, brine solution and methylene chloride were poured
into the flask. The separated organic layer was washed with
water and dried over magnesium sulfate. The solvent was
removed in vacuo, and the residue was chromatographed with
hexanes-ethyl acetate (9:1) to give the product.
2,6-Diisop r op yl-4-[(4′-m eth oxyp h en yl)m eth yl]p h en ol
(pa r a p r od u ct): oil; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.25 (d, J ) 6.96 Hz,
(24) (a) Cohen, L. J . Org. Chem. 1957, 22, 1333. (b) Allen, C. F. H.;
Leubner, G. W. Org. Syntheses Coll. Vol. 4, 866. (c). Unangst, P. C.;
Conner, D. T.; Centenco, W. A.; Sorenson, R. J .; Kostlan, C. R.; Sircar,
J . C.; Wright, C. D.; Schrier. D. J .; Dyer, R. D. J . Med. Chem. 1994,
37, 322. (d) Matsuura, T.; Nagamachi, T.; Matsuo, K.; Nishinaga, A.
J . Med. Chem. 1968, 11, 322. (e) Smith, W. E. J . Org. Chem. 1972, 37,
3972.