Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article
receiving flask to protect the peptide after cleavage. TFA/DCM (2% v/v,
10 mL) was then added and swirled for 1 min. The mixture was then
gently vacuum filtered without allowing the resin to proceed to dryness.
This step was repeated 3 times followed by a 20 mL DCM wash. The
filtrate contained the peptide and pyridinium trifluoroacetate salt and
was rotary-evaporated to ∼10% of the original volume. Approximately
40 mL of deionized water was added to the flask, and the solution was
allowed to cool in an ice bath for at least 10 min. The precipitate was
collected on a fritted funnel and washed with 10 mL of deionized water
(3×), followed by 10 mL of diethyl ether (2×). An oven-dried round-
bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar was cooled under argon
and charged with 25.0 mL of dry THF and 8 (376.6 mg, 0.577 mmol).
To the stirring suspension, p-nitrophenyl chloroformate (127.9 mg, 1.1
equiv) was added followed immediately by pyridine (51.33 μL, 1.1
equiv). Over the course of 20 min, all solids went into solution, after
which the reaction progress was monitored by RP-HPLC (method 1)
until complete, as evidenced by the consumption of 8 (eluting at 13.4
min), which typically required 18−24 h. The reaction mixture was then
diluted with 250 mL of ethyl acetate and washed once with 150 mL of
deionized water, followed by extractions with 150 mL of saturated
sodium bicarbonate until the aqueous layer no longer turned yellow
(typically five extractions). The organic layer was dried over sodium
sulfate and concentrated by rotary evaporation to yield 400 mg (85%) of
a pale yellow solid that was used without further purification. Ac-
GaFK(alloc)-PABA-pNP was characterized by the following spectro-
scopic data with NMR assignments made from 1H NMR and
homonuclear COSY (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz): δ 0.94 (d, 3H, J = 7.0
Hz, Ala-CH3), 1.32−1.27 (m, 1H, Lys-γ′), 1.40−1.33 (m, 1H, Lys-γ),
1.49−1.40 (m, 2H, Lys-δ), 1.70−1.61 (m, 1H, Lys-β′), 1.77−1.71 (m,
1H, Lys-β), 1.82 (s, 3H, N-acetyl), 2.75 (dd, 1H, J = 13.7, 10.7 Hz, Phe-
β), 2.98 (apparent q, 2H, J = 6.3 Hz, Lys-ε), 3.09 (dd, 1H, J = 13.7, 3.5
Hz, Phe-β′), 3.62 and 3.66 (AB of ABX pattern, 2H, JAB = 16.5, JAX = 5.8,
JBX = 5.7 Hz, Gly-α), 4.24 (apparent p, 1H, J = 7.0 Hz, Ala-α), 4.35
(apparent q, 1H, J = 7.7 Hz, Lys-α), 4.43 (d, 2H, J = 5.3 Hz, alloc), 4.56
(ddd, 1H, J = 10.7, 8.6, 3.5 Hz, Phe-α), 5.14 (dd, 1H, J = 10.6, 3.0 Hz,
alloc), 5.25 (s, 2H, Bn), 5.88 (ddt, 1H, J = 17.0, 10.6, 5.3 Hz, alloc),
7.18−7.12 (m, 1H, p-Ph), 7.29−7.18 (m, 5H, o,m-Ph and Lys-ε-NH),
7.42 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, PABC-H2,6), 7.60−7.53 (AA′XX′ pattern, 2H,
PNP-H2,6), 7.67 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, PABC-H3,5), 8.00 (d, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz,
Ala-α-NH), 8.04 (X of ABX, 1H, JAX = 5.8, JBX = 5.7 Hz, Gly-α-NH),
8.22 (d, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz, Phe-α-NH), 8.24 (d, 1H, J = 6.2 Hz, Lys-α-NH),
8.36−8.28 (AA′XX′ pattern, 2H, PNP-H3,5), 10.05 (s, 1H, PABC-NH)
ppm.
1H, Lys-β), 1.88 (s, 3H, Ac), 2.1 (dd, 1H, J = 14, 4 Hz, 8), 2.17 (broad m,
1H, 2′), 2.41 (d, 1H, J = 14, Hz, 8), 3.01 (d, 1H, J = 18 Hz, 10), 2.98 (dd,
1H, J = 9, 5 Hz, Phe-β), 3.09 (m, 2H, Lys-ε), 3.23 (m, 1H, Phe-β), 3.23
(d, 1H, J = 18 Hz, 10), 3.98 (dd, 1H, J = 5, 1 Hz, 4′), 4.03 (s, 3H, 4-
OMe), 4.10 (m, 1H, Ala-α), 4.08−4.12 (m, 2H, 3′ and 5′), 4.45 (dd, 1H,
J = 9, 5 Hz, Lys-α), 4.49 (broad, 2H, 3‴), 4.55 (dd, 1H, J = 9, 6 Hz, Phe-
α), 4.70 (s, 2H, 14), 4.90 (d, 1H, J = 4 Hz, OCH2N), 4.96 (broad, 1H,
OCH2N), 5.06 and 5.8 (broad AB pattern, 2H, J = 11 Hz, Bn), 5.14 (d,
1H, J = 10 Hz, 1‴c ROESY), 5.23 (d, 1H, J = 18 Hz, 1‴t ROESY), 5.26
(m, 1H, 7), 5.39 (t, 1H, J = 5 Hz, 1′), 5.85 (ddt, 1H J = 16, 10, 5 Hz, 2‴),
7.15 (m, 1H, Phe-p-Ph), 7.16 (m, 2H, Phe-o-Ph), 7.22 (m, 2H, Phe-m-
Ph), 7.26 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, 2″ ROESY), 7.37 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, 3), 7.56 (d,
2H, J = 8 Hz, 3″), 7.74 (t, 1H, J = 8 Hz, 2), 7.99 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, 1); 13C
NMR chemical shifts from HSQC δ 15.75 (5′-Me), 16.19 (Ala-Me),
22.25 (Ac), 22.54 (Lys-γ), 29.11 (Lys-δ), 29.27 (2′), 30.49 (Lys -β),
34.09 (10), 36.73 (Phe-β), 35.84 (8), 40.33 (Lys-ε), 42.79 (Gly-α),
49.83 (Ala-α), 53.68 (Lys-α), 55.16 (Phe-α), 56.59 (4-OMe), 65.05
(14), 65.33 (3′ and 5′), 65.61 (3‴), 66.79 (Bn), 68.95 (7), 77.60 (4′),
78.83 (O-CH2-N), 99.59 (1′), 117.29 (1‴), 118.97 (3), 119.76 (1),
120.11 (3″), 126.88 (p-Phe), 128.81 (o-Phe), 128.79 (2″), 128.52 (m-
Phe), 132.79 (2‴), 135.54 ppm (2); some unprotonated carbons from
HMBC δ 121.7 (4a), 133.8 (6a), 161.5 (4), 170.5 (Lys-α CO), 171.8
(Ac-CO), 170.8 (Gly-CO), 171.9 (Phe-CO), 173.7 (Ala-CO), 213.9
ppm (13); MS-ESI+, observed MH+ 1234.4832; calculated MH+
1234.4827.
Deprotection To Form GaFK-Doxaz, Phosphate Salt (2b).
Compound 10 (5.3 mg, 0.0043 mmol) was dissolved in 600 μL of 5:1
DCM/AcOH. To this, tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)Pd0 (4.96 mg, 1
equiv, Strem Chemicals, Newburyport, MA) was added. The reaction
was left in the dark for 80 min, at which point the DCM was removed by
rotary evaporation. The acidic solution was diluted with 6 mL of 20 mM
phosphate buffer, pH 4.6, and extracted 3 times with 6−7 mL of ethyl
acetate to remove any triphenylphosphine oxide produced during the
deprotection, spinning briefly at 1500g to produce a clean interface. The
desired product was purified from the extracted aqueous solution by
preparative HPLC on a C-18 Dyanmax 100 Å, 25 cm semipreparatory
column (10 mm i.d.) run isocratically with 50% acetonitrile, 50% 20 mM
phosphate buffer, pH 4.6, at 3 mL/min. The product eluted at 10 min.
The eluent was lyophilized to yield a red solid consisting of a mixture of
the final material and sodium phosphate in 95% overall yield from 9. The
prodrug was dissolved away from the majority of the sodium phosphate
by five washes with 50 μL of 9:1 DMSO/water to yield an acidic water−
DMSO solution of 2b. Cold storage (>3 weeks at −20 °C) of 2b in this
form eventually resulted in multiple red products by HPLC, presumably
due to a low level reactivity of DMSO with the small percentage of
deprotonated Lys-ε-NH2. To prevent this, following removal of the
majority of the phosphate salts, the DMSO was evaporated by SpeedVac
(10−2 Torr) and the pure final material dissolved in saline (0.9% NaCl)
containing 10% PEG-400. To increase the stability of the product, 5 mM
sodium phosphate, pH 4.6, was added to this solution. Cold storage of
this formulation has shown good stability for at least 2 months. The
overall yield of the formulated final 2b was 78% from 9 and was
characterized by the following spectroscopic data with NMR assign-
ments made from 1H NMR, homonuclear COSY, ROESY, HSQC, and
HMBC spectra: 1H NMR at 50 °C (500 MHz, DMSO-d6/D2O
phosphate, pH 4) δ 1.01 (d, 3H, J = 7 Hz, Ala-Me), 1.17 (d, 3H, J = 7 Hz,
5′-Me), 1.24−1.42 (broad m, 2H, Lys-δ), 1.55 (p, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Lys-γ),
1.6−1.76 (broad m, 2H, Lys-β), 1.84 (m, 2H, 2′), 1.83 (s, 3H, Ac), 2.13
(dd, 1H, J = 14, 5 Hz, 8), 2.18 (dd, 1H, J = 14, 3 Hz, 8), 2.75 (m, 2H, Lys-
ε), 2.89 and 2.91 (AB pattern, 2H, J = 18 Hz, 10), 2.79 (m, 1H, Phe-β),
3.04 (m, 1H, Phe-β), 3.97 (dd, 1H, J = 6, 2 Hz, 4′), 4.14 (q, J = 6 Hz, 1H,
Ala-α), 3.93 (s, 3H, 4-OMe), 4.04 (q, J = 6 Hz, 1H, 3′), 4.24 (m, 1H, 5′),
4.26 (m, 1H, Lys-α), 4.42 (dd, 1H, J = 11, 2 Hz, Phe-α), 4.54 and 4.55
(AB pattern, J = 20 Hz, 2H, 14), 4.82 and 4.83 (AB pattern, 2H, J = 3 Hz,
OCH2N), 4.95 (dd, J = 5, 3 Hz, 1H, 7), 4.99 and 5.01 (AB pattern, 2H, J
= 13 Hz, Bn), 5.22 (t, 1H, J = 4 Hz, 1′), 7.10 (broad m, 1H, Phe-p-Ph),
7.16 (broad m, 4H, Phe-o- and m-Ph), 7.25 (d, 2H, J = 7 Hz, 2″ ROESY),
7.37 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, 3), 7.51 (broad, 2H, 3″), 7.56 (m, 1H, 2), 7.84 (m,
2H, 1 and 3); 13C NMR chemical shifts from HSQC δ 16.15 (5′-Me),
17.76 (Ala-Me), 22.50 (Ac), 26.57 (Lys-γ), 22.57 (Lys-δ), 29.27 (2′),
Ac-GaFK(alloc)-PABC-Doxaz (10). An oven-dried round-bottom
flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar was cooled under argon and
charged with 9 (126.13 mg, 0.1161 mmol), 1-hydroxybenzotriazole
(23.61 mg, 1 equiv), and 500 μL of dry DMSO. To this, doxaz (85.68
mg, 1 equiv) dissolved in 500 μL of dry DMSO was added, and the
mixture was left to stir under argon in the dark and monitored by HPLC
(method 1) until complete, as evidenced by the disappearance of
carbonate starting material (approximately 36 h). The reaction mixture
was then diluted with an additional 2 mL of DMSO. A 15 mL medium
fritted sintered glass funnel was charged with 10 mL of cold PBS, pH 7.4.
The red reaction mixture was added dropwise, and the resulting red
precipitate was washed four times with 10 mL of PBS and then two
washes with 10 mL of deionized water. The precipitate was washed from
the filter with a mixture of 10:1 chloroform/methanol and concentrated
by rotary evaporation. The majority of the crude red solid, which was a
mixture containing a 46% yield of 10, was moved forward without any
additional purification. However, to facilitate characterization of 10, the
red solid was purified by preparative silica gel TLC, spotted in and eluted
with 10:1 chloroform/methanol. The desired product (the major band)
was excised, suspended, and vortexed in the elution solvent and
centrifuged to remove the silica gel. The solvent was removed by rotary
evaporation to produce solid, pure 10 that was characterized by the
1
following spectroscopic data with NMR assignments made from H
1
NMR, homonuclear COSY, ROESY, HSQC, and HMBC spectra: H
NMR at 55 °C (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.20 (d, 3H, J = 7 Hz, Ala-Me), 1.31
(d, 3H, J = 5 Hz, 5′-Me), 1.32 (m, 2H, Lys-γ), 1.44 (m, 1H, Lys-δ), 1.50
(broad m, 1H, Lys-δ), 1.73 (m, 1H, Lys-β), 1.75 (m, 1H, 2′), 1.87 (m,
6604
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm300714p | J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 6595−6607