generic leaving group SCR1dNR2 (substituted thioimidoyl
derivatives). It should be noted that a number of such
moieties have been previously employed at the anomeric
center in an attempt to achieve better stereocontrol of the
glycosylation process.10 For example, benzothiazolyl,11 pyridin-
2-yl,12-14 pyrimidin-2-yl,12,15 imidazolin-2-yl,12 and 1′-phenyl-
1H-tetrazolyl16 1-thio derivatives performed exceptionally
well, in most cases providing high anomeric selectivity.
Unfortunately, the lower stability of these derivatives in
comparison to that of “stable” glycosyl donors, O-pentenyl17
or thioglycosides,18,19 toward protecting group manipulations
is the major drawback of these glycosylation approaches,
which limits their application for convergent oligosaccharide
synthesis. We decided to explore this concept taking into
consideration the following advantageous features of the
substituted thioimidates. First, these compounds can be
synthesized via a number of well-established reaction
pathways starting from anomeric halides, acetates, or 1,2-
anhydro sugars and are therefore easily accessible. Second,
we assumed that their glycosyl donor reactivity can be
adjusted by varying the electronic properties of R1 and R2
substituents. Third, the overall size of the anomeric sub-
stituent may influence the reactivity/stability of these thio
derivatives dramatically,20 which would allow the application
of various (chemo)selective glycosylation approaches.3
Here we describe the synthesis of novel 1,2-trans-S-
benzoxazolyl derivatives (SBox glycosides) and their ap-
plication for stereoselective 1,2-cis glycosylation.21 For this
purpose 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-2-O-benzyl-R-D-glucopyranosyl
bromide (1a)22,23 was reacted with 2-mercapto-benzoxazole
in the presence of K2CO3 in acetone at 50 °C to afford
benzoxazolyl 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-2-O-benzyl-1-thio-â-D-gly-
copyranoside (2a) in 92% yield (Scheme 1). Similarly, the
SBox glycoside of D-galactose 2b was prepared from 1b24,25
in 90% yield. Interestingly, the newly synthesized compounds
were shown to be able to withstand rather harsh reaction
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Novel SBox Derivatives 2a and 2b
conditions required for protective group manipulations, i.e.,
acetylation, deacetylation, benzylation, and triphenylmethy-
lation, as well as benzylidene acetal formation and cleavage.
In addition, alternative approaches for the synthesis of
nonparticipating SBox glycosides have been explored. Thus,
acetobromoglucose was reacted with 2-mercaptobenzoxazole
in the presence of K2CO3 in acetone at 50 °C, followed by
Zemplen deacetylation (MeONa/MeOH) and benzylation
(BnBr/NaH), to allow benzoxazolyl 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzyl-
1-thio-â-D-glycopyranoside in 52% yield over three steps.
The SBox moiety could also be introduced via Lewis acid
(BF3‚Et2O, TMSOTf)-catalyzed glycosidation of pentaacetyl
â-D-glucose. Analogous thiazolyl 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzyl-1-
thio-â-D-glucopyranoside has been accordingly prepared by
reaction of acetobromoglucose with 2-mercaptothiazoline in
the presence of NaH in MeCN, followed by deacetylation
and benzylation. Application of these derivatives for glyco-
sylation will be reported in due course. It should be noted
that syntheses of per-acetylated thiazolylthio26 and benzox-
azolylthio27,28 derivatives have been previously reported.
Having synthesized SBox glycosides 2a and 2b, we turned
our attention to the evaluation of their glycosyl donor pro-
perties. Considering the multifunctional character of the leav-
ing group, we anticipated that these donors could be activated
via a number of conceptually different modes (Figure 1).
(11) Mukaiyama, T.; Nakatsuka, T.; Shoda, S. I. Chem. Lett. 1979, 487-
490.
(12) Hanessian, S.; Bacquet, C.; Lehong, N. Carbohydr. Res. 1980, 80,
c17-c22.
(13) Woodward, R. B.; Logusch, E.; Nambiar, K. P.; Sakan, K.; Ward,
D. E.; Au-Yeung, B. W.; Balaram, P.; Browne, L. J.; Card, P. J.; Chen, C.
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 3215-3217.
(14) Reddy, G. V.; Kulkarni, V. R.; Mereyala, H. B. Tetrahedron Lett.
1989, 30, 4283-4286.
(15) Chen, Q.; Kong, F. Carbohydr. Res. 1995, 272, 149-157.
(16) Tsuboyama, K.; Takeda, K.; Torii, K.; Ebihara, M.; Shimizu, J.;
Suzuki, A.; Sato, N.; Furuhata, K.; Ogura, H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1990,
38, 636-638.
(17) Fraser-Reid, B.; Anilkumar, G.; Gilbert, M. B.; Joshi, S.; Kraehmer,
R. In Carbohydrates in Chemistry and Biology; Ernst, B., Hart, G. W.,
Sinay, P., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: 2000; Vol. 1, pp 135-154.
(18) Garegg, P. J. AdV. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1997, 52, 179-
205.
(19) Oscarson, S. In Carbohydrates in Chemistry and Biology; Ernst,
B., Hart, G. W., Sinay, P., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: 2000; Vol. 1, pp 93-116.
(20) Boons, G. J.; Geurtsen, R.; Holmes, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
6325-6328.
(21) Malysheva, N. N.; De Meo, C.; Demchenko, A. V. Presented at
the 21st International Carbohydrate Symposium, July 7-12, 2002, Cairns,
Australia.
(22) Brennan, S.; Finan, P. A. J. Chem. Soc., C 1970, 1742-1744.
(23) Excoffier, G.; Gagnaire, D. Y.; Vignon, M. R. Carbohydr. Res. 1976,
46, 215-226.
(24) Lemieux, R. U.; Kondo, T. Carbohydr. Res. 1974, 35, C4-C6.
(25) Kochetkov, N. K.; Klimov, E. M.; Malysheva, N. N.; Demchenko,
A. V. Carbohydr. Res. 1991, 212, 77-91.
Figure 1. Plausible Reaction Intermediates for the Activation of
SBox Glycosides.
Thus, heavy metal salt-based promoter systems would
complex sulfur and nitrogen, improving the leaving group
ability by producing a partial positive charge on sulfur (A).
(26) Cottier, L.; Descotes, G.; Kudelska, W. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Serie
II 1992, 314, 657-660.
(27) Zinner, H.; Pfeifer, M. Ber. 1963, 96, 432-437.
(28) Zinner, H.; Peseke, K. Chem. Ber. 1965, 98, 3515-3519.
456
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 4, 2003