In fact, such dotted patterning of PEO nanocylinders can be
perfectly achieved over several centimeters, which have been
confirmed by acquiring AFM images spaced by 100 mm over the
whole substrate.
was detected by AFM after the ADLC films were exposed to room
light for six months (Fig. S3 and S4{).
To check the H-bonds in the annealed block copolymer films
with regular stable PONA structures, in situ FTIR spectra were
measured at different temperatures, which are given in Fig. 2c.
According to the analysis, four possible stages are summarized in
Fig. 4a. Stage (1) shows that strong H-bonds exist among the out-
of-plane aligned aramid mesogens in the annealed copolymer film
at room temperature, which may play an important role in the
stabilization of the microphase-separated nanostructures. Upon
heating, the H-bonds are partly destroyed, leading to a slight
decrease in both absorption peaks at 3340 cm21 and 1646 cm21
(Fig. 2c) prior to the melting, and the alignment of the mesogens
remains in stage (2). When the film temperature is higher than the
melting point but lower than the LC phase-transition temperature,
all of the H-bonds might be destroyed completely, resulting in an
obvious decrease in both of the peaks shown in Fig. 3c. A new
shoulder peak at 1672 cm21 appeared, which is attributed to the
vibration of carbonyl bond in aramid without H-bonds. Due to
the smectic LC ordering, the alignment of the aramid groups was
maintained in stage (3). Evidently, random alignment of the
aramid mesogens was induced because of the loss of LC properties
in an isotropic phase in stage (4), leading to a further decrease in
the peak at 1646 cm21 and a corresponding increase in its shoulder
peak at 1672 cm21. Both the out-of-plane alignment of aramid
mesogens and the formation of H-bonds are reversible upon
cooling the sample films, as shown in Fig. 4a. It is worth
mentioning here that H-bonds might also be formed between the
EO units and the aramid mesogens, and a plausible microphase-
separated structure by supramolecular self-assembly is depicted in
Fig. 4b. Obviously, the introduction of aramid mesogens with
H-bonds in the ADLC not only enables one to obtain macroscopic
regular arrays of PONA without external forces, but also improves
the stability of the self-assembled nanostructures.
To obtain good microphase-separated structures, the annealing
temperature was chosen as 140 uC, slightly higher than the phase-
transition temperature (Fig. 1),4 which acts by destroying the
H-bonds, lowering the viscosity of the block copolymer films and
enabling the microphase separation to proceed completely in an
isotropic state. Furthermore, a wider range of LC temperature was
obtained on cooling than the heating process, permitting the LC
ordering to influence the microphase separation and achieve
regularly ordered nanostructures. In the cooling process, the PEO
domains are confined to the continuous phase of the aramid
mesogens, and mass transport of the PEO domains is prevented.
Contraction of the confined PEO domains might occur on
cooling,11 leading to a dent of several nanometers in the 3-D AFM
image (Fig. 4b). Compared with our previous work,3,4 the stability
of the microphase-separated structures has been improved by
replacing the azobenzene mesogens with the aramid groups, which
have strong H-bonds. No obvious change in the PONA structures
In summary, a novel PEO-based diblock LC copolymer with
aramid mesogens was prepared by ATRP. The bulk films of the
well-defined block copolymer showed macroscopic PONA struc-
tures of PEO phase domains dispersed in the continuous phase of
aramid mesogens, owing to supramolecular self-assembly. Such
periodic nanostructures showed a high stability under room light
because of the existence of successive H-bonds in the matrix. The
obtained block copolymer may function as a reliable nano-
template for restricted chemical or electrochemical reactions to
prepare desirable arrays of nanowires, tube, rods, dots, etc.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the Japan Society for
the Promotion of Science (JSPS).
Notes and references
1 S. O. Kim, H. H. Solak, M. P. Stoykovich, N. J. Ferrier, J. J. Pablo and
P. F. Nealey, Nature, 2003, 424, 411.
2 (a) W. A. Lopes and H. M. Jaeger, Nature, 2001, 414, 735; (b)
C. A. Breen, T. Deng, T. Breiner, E. L. Thomas and T. M. Swager,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 9942; (c) T. Thurn-Albrecht, J. Schotter,
G. A. Ka¨stle, N. Emley, T. Shibauchi, L. Krusin-Elbaum, K. Guarini,
C. T. Black, M. T. Tuominen and T. P. Russell, Science, 2000, 290,
2126; (d) J. Y. Cheng, C. A. Ross, H. T. Smith and E. L. Thomas, Adv.
Mater., 2006, 18, 2505.
Fig. 4 Schematic illustration of the microphase-separated structures and
the hydrogen bonds in the block copolymer films. (A) Possible scheme of
hydrogen bonds and orientation of the aramid mesogens upon heating. (B)
Three-dimensional AFM image of the block copolymer film and plausible
structures of the microphase separation by supramolecular self-assembly.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
J. Mater. Chem., 2007, 17, 3485–3488 | 3487