PAPER
Oxidative Desulfurization of Imidazole-2-thiones with Benzoyl Peroxide
2007
13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d = 182.1, 173.7, 157.9, 156.2,
130.6, 127.7, 127.6, 124.2, 114.9, 113.3, 59.8, 54.8, 42.3, 34.5.
persion while stirring overnight. Addition of MeI (84 mL, 0.19 g,
1.35 mmol) gave a clear soln in 2 h, which was stirred another 4 h
before the addition of H2O (30 mL). The mixture was extracted with
CH2Cl2 (3 × 15 mL), the combined organic extracts were washed
with H2O and brine (1 × 20 mL each), dried (MgSO4), filtered, and
concentrated. After chromatography over 230–400 mesh silica gel
(20 g) with a solvent gradient (EtOAc → 5:1 EtOAc–EtOH), the
crude product (Rf = 0.40, 5:1 EtOAc–EtOH) still contained phenol
12. The residue was redissolved in Et2O (50 mL), washed with aq 3
M NaOH (3 × 25 mL), H2O and brine (1 × 25 mL each), dried
(MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated to afford 13 (0.2200 g, 69%)
with 1H and 13C NMR spectra matching those in the literature;40 mp
83.5–86 °C (Lit.40 mp 84–85 °C).
HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C18H18N2O3S [M+]: 342.10381; found:
342.1031.
1-(p-Methoxybenzyl)-4-(p-hydroxybenzyl)imidazole-2-thione
(11)
2-Thiohydantoin 10 (2.21 g, 6.5 mmol) was less sensitive to the
conditions of reduction than the model compounds, and was added
to a soln of NaBH4 (0.54 g, 14 mmol) and LiCl (0.60 g, 14 mmol)
in 3:1 DME–EtOH (30 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction was allowed to
reach r.t. overnight. A TLC analysis showed incomplete consump-
tion of 10, but no overreduction. The reaction was stopped by the
addition of concd HCl (10 mL). The mixture was stirred 30 min, di-
luted with H2O (150 mL), and washed with CH2Cl2 (3 × 50 mL).
The combined organic extracts were washed with H2O and brine
(1 × 20 mL each), dried (MgSO4), filtered, plugged with 230–400
mesh silica gel (3 g), and concentrated. The silica gel plug was load-
ed on a silica gel column (230–400 mesh, 60 g) packed in EtOAc;
elution with the same delivered 11 (1.14 g, 54%); Rf = 0.76
(EtOAc); mp 198–204 °C.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation
(CHE-0209857). We thank Prof. James de Haseth and Mr. J. Brian
Loudermilk for the use of their IR spectrophotometer and for tech-
nical assistance.
IR (ATR): 3128, 3069, 3013, 2964, 2924, 1511 cm–1.
References
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3/DMSO-d6): d = 11.80 (s, 1 H, NH),
8.76 (s, 1 H, OH), 7.24 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 6.97 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2
H, ArH), 6.84 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 6.74 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2 H, ArH),
6.17 (s, 1 H, H-5), 5.06 (s, 2 H, NCH2C6H4OMe), 3.77 (s, 3 H,
OCH3), 3.60 (s, 2 H, CH2C6H4OH).
(1) Hofmann, K. Imidazole and its Derivatives; Interscience
Publishers: New York, 1953.
(2) Review: Trzhtsinskaya, B. V.; Abramova, N. D. Sulfur Rep.
1991, 10, 389.
(3) Xi, N.; Xu, S.; Cheng, Y.; Tasker, A. S.; Hungate, R. W.;
Reider, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 7315.
(4) Baran, P. S.; Shenvi, R. A.; Mitsos, C. A. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 3714.
(5) Loksha, Y. M.; El-barbary, A. A.; El-badawi, M. A.;
Nielsen, C.; Pedersen, E. B. Synthesis 2004, 116.
(6) Chang, J. H.; Lee, K. W.; Nam, D. H.; Kim, W. S.; Shin, H.
Org. Process Res. Dev. 2002, 6, 674.
(7) Grivas, S.; Ronne, E. Acta Chem. Scand. 1995, 49, 225.
(8) Karkhanis, D. W.; Field, L. Phosphorus, Sulfur Relat. Elem.
1985, 22, 49.
(9) Pesch, J.; Harms, K.; Bach, T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004,
2025.
(10) Frachey, G.; Crestini, C.; Bernini, R.; Saladino, R.;
Mincione, E. Heterocycles 1994, 38, 2621.
(11) Ashutosh Pandey, N. D.; Mehrotra, J. K. Heterocycles 1979,
12, 1339.
(12) Buran, V.; Massaroli, G. G. Boll. Chim. Farm. 1980, 119,
725; Chem. Abstr. 1981, 95, 62075y.
(13) Hayakawa, I.; Yamazaki, K.; Dohmori, R.; Koga, N.
Heterocycles 1978, 10, 241.
(14) Jones, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 1085.
(15) Tanaka, K.; Shimazak, M.; Murakami, Y. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1982, 30, 2714.
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3/DMSO-d6): d = 160.5, 159.0, 155.9,
129.4, 129.3, 129.1, 128.3, 127.4, 115.3, 113.8, 113.6, 55.0, 49.1,
30.2.
HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C18H18N2O2S [M+]: 326.10890; found:
326.1090.
1-(p-Methoxybenzyl)-4-(p-hydroxybenzyl)imidazole (12)
Solid 11 (1.0 g, 3.1 mmol) was added in one portion to a slurry of
75% (BzO)2 (4.95 g, 15 mmol) in THF (5 mL). The reaction came
to spontaneous reflux; after cooling back to r.t., the mixture was di-
luted with H2O (20 mL) and Et2O (20 mL). The aqueous layer was
collected, and the organic layer was washed with H2O (1 × 10 mL).
The combined aqueous layers were washed with CH2Cl2 (3 × 5
mL), then treated with aq 6 M NaOH (5 mL) and stirred until no
(BzO)2 was visible by TLC (less than 1 h). The pH was lowered to
8 with sat. aq NH4Cl (25 mL) before extraction with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10
mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O and brine
(1 × 20 mL each), dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated to
leave 12 (0.79 g, 87%); mp 131–133 °C.
IR (ATR): 3106, 3034, 2996, 2903, 2829, 2787, 2669, 2580, 1609,
1509 cm–1.
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD): d = 7.44 (s, 1 H, ImH), 7.11
(d, J = 8 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 7.05 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 6.87 (d, J = 8
Hz, 2 H, ArH), 6.74 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 6.51 (s, 1 H, ImH), 4.95
(s, 2 H, NCH2C6H4OMe), 4.47 (br s, 1 H, OH), 3.79 (s, 3 H, OCH3),
3.77 (s, 2 H, CH2C6H4OH).
(16) Schoenherr, H. J.; Wanzlick, H. W. Chem. Ber. 1970, 103,
1037.
(17) Jones, R. G.; Kornfeld, E. C.; McLaughlin, K. C.; Anderson,
R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 4000.
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD): d = 159.7, 155.3, 142.9,
136.5, 131.0, 129.9, 129.2, 128.2, 116.4, 115.4, 114.5, 55.4, 50.6,
33.8.
(18) Kister, J.; Assef, G.; Mille, G.; Metzger, J. Can. J. Chem.
1979, 57, 813.
(19) Marckwald, W. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1892, 25, 2354.
(20) Kuhn, N.; Kratz, T. Synthesis 1993, 561.
(21) Markwalder, J. A.; Pottorf, R. S.; Seitz, S. P. Synlett 1997,
521.
(22) Scott, J. E.; Henderson, G. Biochem. J. 1968, 109, 209.
(23) Johnson, J. R.; Buchanan, J. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73,
3749.
(24) Chang, W.-J.; Kulkarni, M. V.; Sun, C.-M. J. Comb. Chem.
2006, 8, 141.
MS (EI): m/z (%) = 294 (26, [M+]), 121 (100, [p-MeOBn+]).
HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C18H18N2O2 [M+]: 294.13683; found:
294.1367.
1,4-Di(p-methoxybenzyl)imidazole (13)
A soln of 12 (0.3053 g, 1.04 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was treated
with LiOH·H2O (0.0447 g, 1.07 mmol) and turned into a fine dis-
Synthesis 2007, No. 13, 2002–2008 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York