used, the decomposition was suppressed to give the benzylidene
derivative 7 in 91% yield. When acetate 6 or benzylidene
derivative 7 in DMF was stirred with silica gel (Merck) at room
temperature for 24 h, elimination of sulfinic acid completely
occurred to give the 1-enitols 9 and 8, respectively, in high yields
(Scheme 1). Similar treatment of the nonprotected 5, however,
resulted in the recovery of 5. Thus, elimination of sulfinic acid
was affected by the hydroxyl group at C-6; that is, if the hydroxyl
group was free, the elimination reaction was suppressed, whereas
it occurred smoothly, if the hydroxyl group was protected.
Different from the 4,6-O-benzylidene derivative 8, tri-O-acetyl-
5
1-enitol 9 occupies a H4 conformation, as judged from small
coupling constants: J3,4 3.2 and J4,5 2.3 Hz. This is in good
agreement with the case of 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-2-deoxy-2-nitro-D-
glucal.11
To confirm the generality of the phenomenon, we have syn-
thesized the cyclohexane-1,2-diacetal 10 and its 6-O-acetate 11
4
(Scheme 2).12 These compounds again did not take up the C1
4
conformation, but a SO or 4,OB-like conformation: J1,2 4.5, J2,3
9.7, J3,4 10.7, J4,5 10.5 Hz for 10 and J1,2 3.7, J2,3 9.2, J3,4 11.0, J4,5
10.3 Hz for 11. The same treatment of the acetate 11 with silica gel
(Merck), as described above, gave the 1-enitol 12 in 80% yield
(Scheme 2), whereas even after 48 h the starting material was
recovered in the case of the 6-O free 10.
Fig. 1 Fully optimized structures of 13 (left) and 14 (right).
Notes and references
1 For example: Carbohydrate Chemistry, ed. G.-J. Boons, Blackie
Academic & Professional, London, 1998, ch. 4 and 5; A. F. Bochkov
and G. E. Zaikov, Chemistry of the O-glycosidic Bond, Pergamon Press,
Oxford, 1979.
2 D. G. Gorenstein, J. B. Findlay, B. A. Luxon and D. Kar, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1977, 99, 3473; A. J. Kirby, Acc. Chem. Res., 1984, 17, 305;
C. W. Andrews, J. P. Bowen and B. Fraser-Reid, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1989, 1913; C. W. Andrews, B. Fraser-Reid and J. B. Bowen,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 8293; M. L. Sinnott, The Anomeric Effect
and Associated Stereoelectronic Effects, in ACS Symp. Ser. 539, ed.
G. R. J. Thatcher, ACS, Washington, DC, 1992, ch. 6, pp. 97–113;
P. Deslongchamps, Organic Chemistry Series, Vol. 1: Stereoelectronic
Effects in Organic Chemistry, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1983.
3 The crystal structure of methyl 2-benzylamino-4,6-O-benzylidene-2,3-
dideoxy-3-C-phenylsulfonyl-b-D-glucopyranoside occupies a 1,4B con-
formation: C. G. Suresh, B. Ravindran, K. N. Rao and T. Pathak, Acta
Crystallogr., Sect. C: Cryst. Struct. Commun., 2000, C56, 1030. The
crystal structure of a puckered pyranoside (N-acetyl/muramic acid) at
an active site of the enzyme lysozyme has a sofa conformation:
R. Kuroki, L. H. Weaver and B. W. Matthews, Science, 1993, 262,
2030.
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: (i) 1,1,2,2-tetramethoxycyclohexane,
CH(OMe)3, CSA, MeOH, reflux for 18 h, 46%; (ii) Ac2O, BF3OEt2, room
temp., 99%; (iii) silica gel 60N in DMF, room temp., 24 h, 80%.
Although experimental evidence is not obtained at the present
stage, hydrogen bonding between the hydroxyl group at C-6 and
the ring oxygen atom (O-5) probably suppressed the elimination of
the anomeric sulfonyl group.
4 For example: D. S. Brown, S. V. Ley, S. Vile and M. Thompson,
Tetrahedron, 1991, 47, 1329.
Ab initio calculations (B3LYP/6-31+G*)13 of model 13 (Fig. 1)
for the benzylidene derivative 7 were in good agreement with
experimental results; the non-chair conformer (C-3 and C-4 are
slightly lower and upper, respectively, from the ideal B2,5
conformation) was more stable than the 4C1 conformer by
2.0 kcal mol21. STO-3G level calculations of model compound
14 (Fig. 1) for the cyclohexane-1,2-diacetal 10 indicated that a non-
chair conformer (the pyranose ring occupies a BO,3-like conforma-
tion, but its C-4 and C-5 take up fairly upper and slightly lower
positions, respectively) is more stable than a chair conformer by
2.3 kcal mol21. During optimization at the 6-31G* level calcula-
tion, however, the chair and non-chair conformers gave the
same non-chair conformer, which is in good agreement with
the coupling constants observed.
5 T. Sakakibara, K. Suzuki, A. Sakai, M. Shindo, C. Nagano, S. Narumi,
Y. Kajihara and K. Mochizuki, Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 5711.
6 The same reaction was performed to give a mixture which was used in
the next reaction without separation: I. P. Smoliakova, R. Caple and
D. Gregory, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 1221.
7 H. Abe, M. Terauchi, A. Matsuda and S. Shuto, J. Org. Chem., 2003,
68, 7439 and references cited therein.
8 E. J. Corey, G. Sarakinos and A. Fischer, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40,
7745.
9 S. J. Angyal, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1969, 8, 157.
10 4, J1,2 10.5, J2,3 10.2, J3,4 8.7, J4,5 9.4; 6, J1,2 2.7, J2,3 2.9, J3,4 6.2, J4,5 9.7;
7, J1,2 1.6, J2,3 2.9, J3,4 8.3, J4,5 10.2, J5,6a 10.2, J5,6e 5.3; 8, J1,3 0.7, J3,4
7.3, J4,5 10.3, J5,6a 10.3, J5,6e 5.1; 12, J1,3 1.4, J3,4 9.2, J4,5 10.8 Hz. In
general, correlation between H-1 and H-5 is stronger than that of H-1
and H-3 or H-3 and H-5 because the distance between H-1 and H-5 is
shorter than that of H-1 and H-3 or H-3 and H-5. In NOESY spectra,
weak correlation between H-1 and H-5 was often observed in these non-
chair conformers, suggesting that a small amount of 1C4 conformer was
also present in an equilibrium.
This work is partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (No. 63540407) from the Ministry of Education, Science
and Culture in Japan and The Grants in Support of the Promotion
of Research at Yokohama City University.
11 R. U. Lemieux, T. L. Nagabhushan and S. W. Gunner, Can. J. Chem.,
1968, 46, 405.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
Chem. Commun., 2007, 3568–3570 | 3569