as 1,2-diphenylethanol, is probably formed through a similar
process.
However, it can be concluded that the organic composition
is likely to play an important role in influencing the reaction
mechanisms and products of PAH photodegradation in
atmospheric aerosol particles.
At least two mechanisms appear to be operative in these
irradation experiments. The first mechanism apparently
results in the production of phthalic acid (II) and other ring-
opening products (III-VII). At least some of these products
were observed whenever benzene or benzene-d6 was used as
the solvent, and their concentrations were highest in benzene-
d6. None of these products were observed in toluene
solutions, except in the presence of vanillin. It is possible
that this mechanism involves singlet oxygen addition to the
aromatic ring. This is a reasonable ring-opening reaction
process for unsubstituted aromatic compounds like benz-
[a]anthracene. Also singlet oxygen has a longer lifetime in
benzene-d6, and the singlet oxygen reaction is not expected
to be competitive in toluene because toluene is a strong
hydrogen donor. Similar products have been observed for
phenanthrene, anthracene, acenaphthylene, and 1-meth-
oxynaphthalene photodegradation in experiments in which
singlet oxygen was directly observed (32-35).
In the second mechanism, several solvent products (X-
XIII) containing a benzyl moiety are formed. At least one of
these products was observed whenever toluene was used as
the solvent. The mechanism probably involves hydrogen
abstraction from the solvent by carbonyl-substituted aromatic
compounds, leading to radical formation. It has been shown
that the benz[a]anthracene decay rate is related to bibenzyl
formation rate (4), but it is not clear whether benz[a]-
anthracene then decays by subsequent radical addition or
some other process. In any case, its decay does not appear
to lead to ring-opening products.
Literature Cited
(1) Kamens, R. M.; Bell, D. A.; Dietrich, A.; Perry, J. M.; Goodman,
R. G.; Claxton, L. D.; Tejada, S. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1985, 19,
63-69.
(2) McDow, S. R.; Sun, Q.; Vartiainen, M.; Hong, Y.; Yao, Y.; Fister,
T.; Yao, R.; Kamens, R. M. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28, 2147-
2153.
(3) Odum, J. R.; McDow, S. R.; Kamens, R. M. Environ. Sci. Technol.
1994, 28, 1285-1290.
(4) Jang, M.; McDow, S. R. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 2654-
2660.
(5) Pitts, J. N. Atmos. Environ. 1987, 21, 2531-2547.
(6) Arey, J.; Harger, W. P.; Helmig, D.; Atkinson, R. Mutat. Res. 1992,
281, 67-76.
(7) Helmig, D.; Lopez-Cancio, J.; Arey, J.; Harger, W. P.; Atkinson,
R. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26, 2207-2213.
(8) Nishioka, M. G.; Lewtas, J. Atmos. Environ. 1992, 26A, 2077-
2087.
(9) Nielsen, T. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1984, 18, 157-163.
(10) Kamens, R. M.; Fan., Z.; Yao, Y.; Vartiainen, M. Chemosphere
1994, 28, 1623-1632.
(11) Fox, M. A.; Olive, S. Science 1979, 205, 582-583.
(12) Pitts, J. N.; Lokensgard, D. M.; Ripley, P. S.; Van Cauwenberghe,
K. A.; Van Vaeck, L.; Shaffer, S. D.; Thill, A. J.; Belser, W. L. Science
1980, 210, 1347-1349.
(13) Kamens, R. M.; Karam, H.; Guo, J.; Perry, J.; Stockburger, L.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 1989, 23, 801-806.
(14) Rogge, W. F.; Mazurek, M. A.; Hildemann, L. M.; Cass, G. R.;
Simoneit, B. R. T. Atmos. Environ. 1993, 27A, 1309-1330.
(15) Dumdei, B. E.; Kenny, D. V.; Shepson, P. B.; Kleindienst, T. E.;
Nero, C. M.; Cupitt, L. T.; Claxton, L. D. Environ. Sci. Technol.
1988, 22, 1493.
Apparently, the first mechanism is most important in
benzene and benzene-d6, and the second mechanism is most
important in toluene. The observation of a precipate after
all irradiations in the presence of each of the co-solutes in
benzene-d6 and benzene but not in toluene also suggests
that different mechanisms are responsible for benz[a]-
anthracene decay in the different solvents.
(16) Atkinson, R. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1994, Monograph No. 2.
(17) Bartolotti, J.; Edney, E. O. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 245, 119-122.
(18) Andino, J. M.; Smith, J. N.; Flagan, R. C.; Goddard, W. A.; Seinfeld,
J. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 10,967-10,980.
(19) Yu, J.; Jeffries, H. E.; Sexton, K. G. Atmos. Environ. In press.
(20) Yu, J.; Jeffries, H. E. Atmos. Environ. In press.
(21) Moriconi, E. J.; Rakoczy, B.; O’Connor W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1961, 83, 4618-4623.
Previous results from kinetic experiments in toluene were
also consistent with a mechanism involving hydrogen ab-
straction from the solvent (4). However, on the basis of those
experiments it was less certain whether singlet oxygen was
involved in the reaction mechanism. Since singlet oxygen
seems the most likely explanation for the ring-opening
products observed, the possibility of a singlet oxygen inter-
mediate in benzene and benzene-d6 should still be considered.
We previously concluded that aerosol organic composition
may strongly influence PAH photodegradation rates in
atmospheric particulate matter and that the mechanism of
decay apparently depends on the composition of light-
absorbing compounds present (2). The product results here
support these conclusions and further suggest that atmo-
spheric PAH decay processes may also depend on such
properties as hydrogen-donating facility and singlet oxygen
solubility, which are also likely to depend on aerosol organic
composition. Both hydrogen abstraction-initiated radical
reactions and singlet oxygen attack are possible mechanisms
of benz[a]anthracene decay in atmospheric particulate matter.
The model systems used in this work were useful for
determining possible reaction mechanisms that should be
explored in organic aerosol photochemistry. In real atmo-
spheric particles, the compounds investigated in this study
are minor components of a complex, largely unknown organic
mixture. The relative importance of the proposed mecha-
nisms depends on such properties as oxygen solubility and
singlet oxygen lifetime in the aerosol particle, hydrogen-
donating properties of its organic components, and light-
absorbing species present, all of which are difficult to
determine. Because the composition of the organic fraction
in most organic aerosols is incompletely understood, it is
possible that other mechanisms may be more important.
(22) Moriconi, E. J.; Taranko, L. B. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 2526-
2529.
(23) Barbas, J. T.; Sigman, M. E.; Buchanan, A. C.; Chevis, E. A.
Photochem. Photobiol. 1993, 58, 155-158.
(24) Lee-Ruff, E.; Kazarians-Moghaddam, H.; Katz, M. Can. J. Chem.
1986, 64, 1297-1303.
(25) Tuhkanen, T. A.; Beltran, F. J. Chemosphere 1995, 30, 1463-
1475.
(26) Kawamura, K.; Ikushima, K. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27, 2227-
2235.
(27) Cautreels, W.; Van Cauwenberghe, K. Atmos. Environ. 1976, 10,
447-457.
(28) Sturrock, M. G.; Cravey, B. J.; Wing, V. A. Can. J. Chem. 1971, 49,
3047-3051.
(29) Legube, B.; Guyon, S.; Sugimitsu, H.; Dore, M. Water Res. 1986,
20, 197-208.
(30) Gaul, M. D.; Junk, G. A.; Svec, H. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1987,
21, 777-784.
(31) Lao, R. C.; Thomas, R. S.; Oja, H.; Dubois, L. Anal. Chem. 1973,
45, 908-915.
(32) Barbas, J. T.; Dabestani, R.; Sigman, M. E. J. Photochem. Photobiol.
A 1994, 80, 103-111.
(33) Dabestani, R.; Ellis, K. J.; Sigman, M. E. J. Photchem. Photobiol.
A 1995, 86, 231-239.
(34) Sigman, M. E.; Barbas, J. T.; Chevis, E. A.; Dabestani, R. New J.
Chem. 1996, 20, 243-248.
(35) Barbas, J. T.; Sigman, M. E.; Dabestani, R. Environ. Sci. Technol.
1996, 30, 1776-1780.
Received for review June 25, 1996. Revised manuscript re-
ceived November 19, 1996. Accepted December 4, 1996.X
ES960559S
X Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, February 15, 1997.
9
VOL. 31, NO. 4, 1997 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 1 0 5 3