D. Lu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 26 (2016) 2129–2132
2131
R1
R2
a: R1=Cl, R2=Cl, R3=H, X=Cl, R= i-Pr
b: R1=OMe, R2=H, R3=OMe, X=Br, R= i-Pr
c: R1=F, R2=F, R3=H, X=Br, R= i-Pr
d: R1=H, R2=OMe, R3=H, X=Br, R= i-Pr
e: R1=Cl, R2=F, R3=H, X= Br, R= i-Pr
f: R1=F, R2=H, R3=F, X=Br, R= i-Pr
g: R1=H, R2=CN, R3=H, X=Br, R= i-Pr
h: R1=CN, R2=H, R3=H, X=Br, R= i-Pr
i: R1=H, R2=H, R3=H, X=Br, R= cyclo-Pr
X
RNH2
+
R3
(I) a-i
(a) 3 eq amine (i-Pr alcohol)
CH2Cl2, 00C to rt, 6-8 h;
Extraction at pH 8-8.5;
Extraction at pH 11-12;
80-85%
(b) ArCOCl,Et3N/THF
O
R1
00C to rt, 75-85%
R1
R2
HN
R
or commercial
amine
Ar
N
R
R2
c) ArCOOH, HATU, HOAt,
DIEA, DMF, rt, 29-49%
R3
(II)
R3
(III)
Or ArCONR'R''
(Entry 2-20)
Scheme 1. Preparation of aryl amides.
Initial variations of the isopropyl group of 1 revealed that sub-
stitution on this nitrogen is essential for activity (e.g., 3 vs 2;
Table 1). Moreover, the size of this R1 seems important since 5
(t-butyl) and 6 (cyclopropyl) maintained inhibition of Ab40 pro-
duction (52% and 37%, respectively) while a methyl-substituted
analog (4) was less active (15%).
These preliminary modifications suggested that at least the size
of an iso-propyl group is preferred for the inhibition of Ab40 pro-
duction. Analogs 2, 5, and 6 also showed no effect on Notch pro-
cessing. This was encouraging data and convinced us to then
turn our attention to replacing the naphthyl group with other aryl
groups (Table 2) and investigating various substitution patterns on
the phenyl ring (Table 3).
The results suggested some structural features that may be nec-
essary for exhibiting Notch1-sparing properties and inhibition of
Ab40 production. Notably, when the naphthyl group was replaced
with a phenyl ring, activity was markedly reduced (8, 10%; Table 2).
However, when a 4-t-butyl group was introduced on the phenyl
ring, activity on the inhibition of APP processing was enhanced
(9, 85%), but the desired Notch1-sparing property was lost. These
results suggest that a bulky group or larger ring system may be
needed to make a tight interaction with the binding site. Introduc-
ing a hydroxyl group on aromatic rings adjacent to the amide car-
bonyl group (e.g., 7 and 15) likely leads to the formation of an
intramolecular hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl and the
amide carbonyl, a notion supported by 1H NMR. Two sets of signals
were seen for compounds without the OH, consistent with two
amide rotomeric forms, as typically observed by NMR. In contrast,
only one set of signals was observed for those analogs with the OH,
consistent with conformation restriction due to H-bonding.
From the data shown in Table 2, it appeared that better activity
was observed when the aryl (Ar) group was larger in size consist-
ing of two fused rings or had larger substituents on a ring. And, in
general, fused bicyclic aryl groups appear to be preferred for selec-
tivity versus Notch1-processing.
Additionally, replacing a chlorine substituent with a fluorine sub-
stituent (35) for R9 reduced activity (33 vs 35). It is encouraging
to note that benzofuranyl amides consistently exhibited Notch-
sparing properties while displaying promising inhibitory effects
on
c
-secretase-mediated Ab production.
This early-stage SAR study of naphthyl and benzofuranyl amide
analogs led to diaryl amides that were found to inhibit Ab40 pro-
duction mediated by -secretase. In particular, the naphthalene-
c
2-yl and benzofuran-2-yl amides displayed Notch1-sparing prop-
erties. Additional Ab42 cellular data was obtained for many of
the compounds that exhibited >50% inhibition in the gamma secre-
tase assay (see Supplemental data). Showing weak activity allowed
us to search diligently for a modified diaryl amide core that exhib-
ited increased potency. Thus, converting the amide to a sulfon-
amide and exploring various substation patterns gave analogs
such as 37, 38, and 39, just a few of the examples synthesized
(Fig. 2).
In summary, it was from the discovery of this amide series that
led to sulfonamide analogs (that were potent against gamma-sec-
retase as well as in cells against Ab40 and Ab42). Some of these
analogs (e.g., 39) were later tested in vivo in animals from which
these results will be reported. These findings have the potential
to lead to a treatment for Alzheimer’s disease that ultimately
may show differentiation from previously failed clinical
candidates.
The results reported here were generated while our laboratories
continued to search for additional templates that could be used for
developing Notch1-sparing
c-secretase inhibitors. Findings of
O
F
O
S
O
N
N
F
F
CO2CH3
2
37
58% at 100 μM, Aβ40
γ -secretase inhibition
IC50 = 0.58 μM, Aβ40
γ -secretase inhibition
Analogs with various substitution patterns (R4, R5, and R6) on
the phenyl group were studied and the results are shown in Table 3.
Maintaining a di-chloro substitution pattern at R9 and R10 with R8
equal to hydrogen seemed to yield the better activity profile.
The findings from the above studies were incorporated into
some of the benzofuranyl analogs shown in Table 4.
In this group of compounds, 3,4-dihalogenated analogs also
exhibited good inhibitory effects on Ab production. Interestingly,
introducing a methyl group at the 3-position (R8) on the benzofu-
ran ring completely abolished the activity (32 vs 31). This observa-
tion could suggest that the orientation of the amide bound with
respect to the benzofuran ring may be critical for activity.
O
O
F
O
O
O
O
S
S
N
N
F
F
Cl
Et
39
Et
CO2H
γ
IC
IC
-secretase inhibition:
38
Cellular assays:
50 = 0.36 μM, Aβ40
IC50 = 0.12 μM, Aβ40
50 = 0.40 μM, Aβ42
= 0.13 μM, Aβ42
IC50
Aβ 42 cellular assay:
IC50 = 10 μM, Notch
IC
50 = 0.62 μM, Aβ42
Figure 2. Evolution of Amide 2.