Synthesis and antibacterial evaluation of 2-ethyl-1-(4-substituted)phenyl- 1h-imidazole derivatives as open-chain analogues of 7-Alkoxyl-4,5-dihydro-imidazo[1,2-A]quinolines

Article abstract of DOI:10.21577/0103-5053.20170190

A novel series of 2-ethyl-1-(4-substituted)phenyl-1H-imidazole derivatives was designed, synthesized, and tested for its antibacterial activity against various bacterial strains. Most of the synthesized compounds showed potent inhibition of several Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values in the range of 4 256 nmol mL^-1 in vitro. The compound [2-ethyl-1-(4-pentoxy)phenyl-1H-imidazole] exhibited the most potent inhibitory activity. The MIC of this compound against S. aureus was found to be 8 nmol mL^-1, smaller than that of the reference agents, ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin. Furthermore, the compound exhibited modest activity against several bacterial strains in a dose range of 8 256 nmol mL^-1.

Full text of DOI:10.21577/0103-5053.20170190

http://dx.doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20170190
J. Braz. Chem. Soc., Vol. 29, No. 4, 701-707, 2018.
Printed in Brazil - ©2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Química
Article
Synthesis and Antibacterial Evaluation of 2-Ethyl-1-(4-substituted)phenyl-
1H-imidazole Derivatives as Open-Chain Analogues of 7-Alkoxyl-4,5-dihydro-
imidazo[1,2-a]quinolines
Xian-Yu Sun,* Mei-Yu Liu, Chun-Yan Zhong, Gui-Lin Zheng, Ming-Yue Lv,
Bo-Tao Jing, Chun-Yuan Pan and Xin Wang
College of Animal Science and Technique, Bayi Agriculture University,
163319 Daqing, Heilongjiang, PR China
A novel series of 2-ethyl-1-(4-substituted)phenyl-1H-imidazole derivatives was designed,
synthesized, and tested for its antibacterial activity against various bacterial strains. Most of
the synthesized compounds showed potent inhibition of several Gram-positive and Gram-
negative bacterial strains with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values in the range of
4-256 nmol mL-1 in vitro. The compound [2-ethyl-1-(4-pentoxy)phenyl-1H-imidazole] exhibited
the most potent inhibitory activity. The MIC of this compound against S. aureus was found to be
8 nmol mL-1, smaller than that of the reference agents, ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin. Furthermore,
the compound exhibited modest activity against several bacterial strains in a dose range of
8-256 nmol mL-1.
Keywords: 2-ethyl-1-(4-substituted)phenyl-1H-imidazole, drug design, MIC, antibacterial
activity
Introduction
of the reference agents, ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin.
Compound I was fused with an imidazole ring at positions
1 and 2 of the quinoline ring. The inhibitory activity of
compound I against Gram-positive (G+) bacterial strains
was found to be weaker than that against the Gram-negative
strains. We hypothesized that the rigid quinoline ring was
probably causing this difference in activity. Hence, it
was designed a series of 2-ethyl-1-(4-substituted)phenyl-
1H-imidazoles as open-chain analogues of compound I.
Compared with compound I, the new scaffold had a more
flexible construction, therefore, it was expected that these
compounds could yield exciting pharmacological results.
Herein, we report the synthesis and activity evaluation
of novel 2-ethyl-1-(4-substituted)phenyl-1H-imidazole
derivatives as potent anti-bacterial agents. The strategy
is intended to obtain potent broad-spectrum antibacterial
activity using traditional medicinal chemistry techniques.
All synthesized compounds were evaluated by the
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and E. coli inhibition
test. Further, compounds with outstanding activity were
tested against several other bacterial strains, containing
both G+/G– bacteria. In addition, their structure-activity
relationship would also be discussed.
The quinoline analogues have been very successful both
medically and commercially over the decades. It could be
easily synthesized, allowing stepwise improvements in
essentially all critical drug-related categories (potency,
antimicrobial spectrum, evolving resistance issues,
pharmacokinetic profile, etc.). Structure modification
of quinoline led to new efficient antibacterial candidate
agents.1-4 However, due to clinically significant parasite
resistance to antibacterial drugs, there is an urgent need to
promote the quest for new efficacious drugs to fight against
resistant pathogens.5-7
In the course of searching for newer antibacterial
candidates, we focused our attention on modifying the
structure of quinoline and its analogues. Our research
group has recently demonstrated that introduction of an
imidazole ring to quinoline moiety caused an increase in
its activity in vitro.8 Compound I (Figure 1) was found
to possess outstanding antibacterial activity, especially
against Gram-negative (G–) bacterial strains. The minimum
inhibitory concentration (MIC) of compound I against
Escherichia coli (E. coli) was 0.5 μg mL-1, lower than that
*e-mail: xianyusun@yeah.net

702
Synthesis and Antibacterial Evaluation of 2-Ethyl-1-(4-substituted)phenyl-1H-imidazole Derivatives
J. Braz. Chem. Soc.
Figure 1. Structure of leading compound I and open-chain analogue 2-ethyl-1-(4-substituted)phenyl-1H-imidazoles.
Experimental
Procedure for synthesis of 2-ethyl-1-(4-hydroxy)phenyl-
1H-imidazole (4)
Material and methods
Under ice-salt bath, to a solution of compound 3 (3.74 g,
20 mmol) in sulfuric acid solution (25%, 50 mL), it was added
dropwise sodium nitrite solution (1.52 g, 22 mmol, in 22 mL
of H2O), the reaction temperature was maintained at 0 °C or
below. When the addition of the sodium nitrite was complete,
it was stirred at 5 °C for 1 h to complete the reaction.
The diazonium intermediate was poured into a 70 °C
of sulfuric acid solution (25%, 50 mL). The resulting
mixture was stirred at 70 °C for 2 h. While the solution
was cooled, the reaction mixture was adjusted to pH = 8
with saturated NaHCO3 solution and extracted with ethyl
acetate (3 × 200 mL). The combined organic layer was
dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated under
reduced pressure. The residue obtained was purified by
chromatography on a silica gel column (ethyl acetate) to
give 4 as a light yellow solid.Yield 50.8%, mp 209-211 °C.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 1.22-1.27 (t, 3H, J 6.0,
9.0 Hz, –CH3), 2.67-2.74 (q, 2H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–),
6.99-7.26 (m, 5H, Ar-H). ESI-MS m/z 189 [M + 1]+.
Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was
conducted on pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 plates (Qingdao
Haiyang, China).Visualizationoftheplateswasaccomplished
by using UV light and/or iodine. Chromatography was
conducted on silica gel 60, 200 mesh (Qingdao Haiyang,
China), under low pressure. Melting points were determined
1
in open capillary tubes and are uncorrected. H and
13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded
using AV-300 FT-NMR spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin AG,
Fallanden, Switzerland). Chemical shifts (d) are reported
in ppm relative to tetramethylsilane. Mass spectra were
recorded on an HP1100LC/MSD electrospray ionization
mass spectrometer (ESI-MS) (Agilent Technologies, Santa
Clara, CA, USA). All starting materials were obtained
from commercial sources (Ouhechem, Beijing) and used as
received unless otherwise indicated.All other chemicals were
of analytical grade. The detailed procedures for preparing
compounds 5a-5q are described below.
Procedure for synthesis of 2-ethyl-1-(4-nitro)phenyl-
General synthetic procedure for target compounds 5a-5q
1H-imidazole (2)
To a solution of compound 4(0.19 g, 1 mmol) and sodium
hydroxide (0.044 g, 1.1 mmol) in dimethylformamide (DMF,
10 mL), it was added the relevant alkyl halide (1.1 mmol),
and the mixture was stirred at 80 °C until the completion of
the reaction, which was as confirmed by TLC. The reaction
was cooled and evaporated to dryness in vacuum. Target
compounds 5a-5q were obtained after purification of the
crude residues on a silica gel column (ethyl acetate:petroleum
ether, 2:1). The yields, melting points, and spectral data for
each compound are provided below.
A mixture of 1(9.61 g, 100 mmol), p-fluoro nitrobenzene
(15.51 g, 110 mmol) and NaOH (4.40 g, 110 mmol)
in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 100 mL) was heated to
90 °C with stirring. After 5 h, the end of the reaction was
confirmed by TLC. After cooling to room temperature, the
precipitates was filtered and washed with appropriate water.
It was obtained a light yellow solid, 18.6 g, yield 84.9%.
Procedure for synthesis of 2-ethyl-1-(4-amino)phenyl-
1H-imidazole (3)
2-Ethyl-1-(4-benzyloxy)phenyl-1H-imidazole (5a)
Yield 81%; mp 66-68 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
d 1.22-1.27 (t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH3), 1.97 (s, H, –CH–),
2.59-2.66 (q, 2H, J 6.0, 6.0 Hz, –CH2–), 5.11 (s, 2H,
–CH2O–), 6.93-7.47 (m, 9H, Ar–H); 13C NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) d 12.35, 20.48, 70.38, 115.44, 120.92, 127.14,
127.39, 127.46, 128.20, 128.69, 136.43, 149.87, 158.56.
ESI-MS m/z 279 [M + 1]+.
A mixture of 2 (4.34 g, 20 mmol), and Pd/C (1 g,
10%, 60% H2O) in ethanol (80 mL) was stirred under
an atmosphere of hydrogen for 4 h at 60 °C. After the
solution was cooled, the reaction mixture was filtered
and evaporated to give a moderate yield of compound 3.
The compound was used directly in the next step without
further purification.

Vol. 29, No. 4, 2018
Sun et al.
703
2-Ethyl-1-[4-(2-chloro)benzyloxy]phenyl-1H-imidazole (5b)
Yield 84%; mp 98-100 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
d 1.22-1.27 (t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH3), 2.60-2.67 (q, 2H,
J 6.0, 6.0 Hz, –CH2–), 5.22 (s, 2H, –CH2O–), 6.95-7.58 (m,
8H, Ar–H); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 12.35, 20.48,
67.53, 115.48, 120.90, 127.04, 127.19, 127.41, 128.82,
129.25, 129.51, 131.25, 132.71, 134.15, 149.85, 158.29.
ESI-MS m/z 313 [M + 1]+.
CDCl3) d 1.23-1.28 (t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH3),
2.61-2.69 (q, 2H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 5.18 (s, 2H,
–CH2O–), 6.95-7.63 (m, 10H,Ar–H); 13C NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) d 12.34, 20.41, 69.82, 115.54, 120.96, 122.41,
127.06, 127.20, 127.66, 128.92, 129.52, 131.09, 132.77,
135.69, 149.83, 158.32. ESI-MS m/z 357 [M + 1]+,
359 [M + 3]+.
2-Ethyl-1-[4-(4-methyl)benzyloxy]phenyl-1H-imidazole (5i)
Yield 78%; mp 68-70 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
d 1.22-1.27 (t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH3), 2.38 (s, 3H,
–CH–), 2.59-2.67 (q, 2H, J 9.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 5.07 (s, 2H,
–CH2O–), 6.94-7.35 (m, 10H,Ar–H); 13C NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) d 12.36, 20.43, 21.21, 70.32, 115.44, 120.95,
127.11, 127.16, 127.60, 129.37, 130.80, 133.35, 138.06,
149.86, 158.67. ESI-MS m/z 293 [M + 1]+.
2-Ethyl-1-[4-(3-chloro)benzyloxy]phenyl-1H-imidazole (5c)
Yield77%;oil;1HNMR(300MHz, CDCl3)d1.22-1.27(t,
3H,J6.0,9.0Hz,–CH3),2.59-2.67(q,2H,J9.0,9.0Hz,–CH2–),
2.88-2.96 (t, 2H, J 24.0 Hz, –CH–), 5.09 (s, 2H, –CH2O–),
5.94-7.46 (m, 9H, Ar–H), 8.02 (s, H, –CH–); 13C NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d 12.34, 20.49, 69.50, 115.43, 120.90,
125.32, 127.21, 127.41, 127.44, 128.32, 129.97, 131.27,
134.65, 138.50, 149.84, 158.22. ESI-MS m/z 313 [M + 1]+.
2-Ethyl-1-(4-propoxy)phenyl-1H-imidazole (5j)
2-Ethyl-1-[4-(4-chloro)benzyloxy]phenyl-1H-imidazole (5d)
Yield 88%; mp 95-94 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
d 1.22-1.27 (t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH3), 2.59-2.67 (q, 2H,
J 9.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 5.08 (s, 2H, –CH2O–), 6.94-7.39 (m,
8H, Ar–H). ESI-MS m/z 313 [M + 1]+.
Yield 75%; oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 1.04-1.09
(t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH3), 1.21-1.26 (t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz,
–CH3), 1.81-1.88 (q, 2H, J 6.0, 6.0 Hz, –CH2–), 2.59-2.67
(q, 2H, J 9.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 3.94-3.99 (t, 2H, J 6.0,
9.0 Hz, –CH2O–), 6.93-7.27 (m, 4H, Ar–H); 13C NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d 10.47, 12.35, 20.40, 22.51, 69.89,
115.04, 120.96, 127.07, 127.09, 130.46, 149.88, 159.03.
ESI-MS m/z 231 [M + 1]+.
2-Ethyl-1-[4-(4-fluoro)benzyloxy]phenyl-1H-imidazole (5e)
Yield 85%; mp 80-82 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
d 1.23-1.28 (t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH3), 2.61-2.68 (q, 2H,
J 6.0, 6.0 Hz, –CH2–), 5.07 (s, 2H, –CH2O–), 6.95-7.45 (m,
10H, Ar–H). ESI-MS m/z 297 [M + 1]+.
2-Ethyl-1-(4-butoxy)phenyl-1H-imidazole (5k)
Yield 82%; oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 0.97-1.02
(t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH3), 1.21-1.26 (t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz,
–CH3), 1.51-1.56 (t, 2H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 1.78-1.83
(q, 2H, J 6.0, 6.0 Hz, –CH2–), 2.60-2.67 (q, 2H, J 6.0,
6.0 Hz, –CH2–), 3.98-4.03 (t, 2H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2O–),
6.94-7.26 (m, 4H, Ar–H); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
d 12.35, 13.79, 19.21, 20.41, 31.22, 68.09, 115.03, 120.97,
127.06, 127.15, 130.44, 149.88, 159.04. ESI-MS m/z 245
[M + 1]+.
2-Ethyl-1-[4-(2-fluoro)benzyloxy]phenyl-1H-imidazole (5f)
Yield 83%; mp 75-77 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
d 1.22-1.27 (t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH3), 5.07 (s, 2H,
–CH2O–), 2.59-2.67 (q, 2H, J 9.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 5.18
(s, 2H, –CH2O–), 6.94-7.54 (m, 10H, Ar–H); 13C NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d 12.35, 20.48, 64.05, 64.11, 115.33,
115.41, 115.61, 120.91, 123.50, 124.32, 124.37, 127.18,
127.40, 129.70, 129.75, 129.95, 130.05, 131.20, 149.86,
158.32, 158.85, 162.13. ESI-MS m/z 297 [M + 1]+.
2-Ethyl-1-(4-pentoxy)phenyl-1H-imidazole (5l)
Yield 83%; oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 0.93-0.97
(t, 3H, J 6.0, 6.0 Hz, –CH3), 1.21-1.26 (t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz,
–CH3), 1.43-1.45 (m, 4H, J 3.0, 3.0 Hz, –CH2CH2–),
1.80-1.85 (t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH3), 2.59-2.67 (q, 2H,
J 9.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 3.97-4.02 (t, 2H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz,
–CH2O–), 6.93-7.26 (m, 4H, –CH2–); 13C NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) d 12.35, 13.98, 20.42, 22.42, 28.17, 28.88, 68.40,
99.98, 115.03, 120.96, 127.07, 127.14, 130.48, 149.88,
159.03. ESI-MS m/z 259 [M + 1]+.
2-Ethyl-1-[4-(4-bromo)benzyloxy]phenyl-1H-imidazole (5g)
Yield 80%; mp 97-99 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
d 1.23-1.28 (t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH3), 2.61-2.68 (q, 2H,
J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 5.08 (s, 2H, –CH2O–), 6.95-7.57 (m,
10H, Ar–H); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 12.34, 20.46,
69.60, 115.44, 120.91, 122.14, 127.19, 127.31, 129.03,
131.16, 131.84, 135.44, 149.82, 158.28. ESI-MS m/z 357
[M + 1]+, 359 [M + 3]+.
2-Ethyl-1-[4-(2-bromo)benzyloxy]phenyl-1H-imidazole (5h)
2-Ethyl-1-(4-hexyloxy)phenyl-1H-imidazole (5m)
1
Yield 80%; mp 102-104 °C; H NMR (300 MHz,
Yield 81%; oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 0.90-0.94

704
Synthesis and Antibacterial Evaluation of 2-Ethyl-1-(4-substituted)phenyl-1H-imidazole Derivatives
J. Braz. Chem. Soc.
(t, 3H, J 6.0, 6.0 Hz, –CH3), 1.21-1.26 (t, 3H, J 6.0,
9.0 Hz, –CH3), 1.34-1.38 (m, 6H, J 3.0, 3.0 Hz, –(CH2)3–),
1.79-1.84 (t, 2H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 2.59-2.67 (q, 2H,
J 9.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 3.97-4.02 (t, 2H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz,
–CH2O–), 6.93-7.26 (m, 4H, Ar–H); 13C NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) d 12.35, 13.99, 20.42, 22.57, 25.68, 29.15, 31.54,
68.42, 77.41, 115.03, 120.95, 127.06, 127.15, 130.47,
149.88, 159.02. ESI-MS m/z 273 [M + 1]+.
Evaluation of antibacterial activity in vitro
MIC values of compounds 4 and 5a-5q against
several bacterial strains were measured using the
broth microdilution method in 96-well plates.9 The
microorganisms used in the present study were as
follows: S. aureus (ATCC 29213), E. coli (ATCC 8739),
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa, ATCC 27853),
Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae, ATCC 10031),
Proteus vulgaris (P. vulgaris, ATCC 35659),
Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium, ATCC 14028),
Pasteurella multocida (P. multocida, ATCC 6529),
Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans, ATCC 25175),
Micrococcus luteus (M. luteus, ATCC 21102), and
Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae, ATCC 6305).
Test compounds dissolved in DMSO were added to the
culture medium (brain heart infusion for S. mutans and
Müller-Hinton agar for other bacteria) to obtain final
concentrations of 1-256 nmol mL-1. The final bacterial
concentration was approximately 106 CFU mL-1. MIC
values were measured after incubation for 20 h at
37 °C. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of
test sequences that completely inhibited the growth.
Ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin were used as controls and
assayed under identical conditions. All experiments were
performed in triplicates.
2-Ethyl-1-(4-heptyloxy)phenyl-1H-imidazole (5n)
Yield 81%; oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 0.88-0.93
(t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH3), 1.21-1.35 (q, 11H, –CH2–),
1.79-1.84 (t, 2H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 2.59-2.67 (q, 2H,
J 9.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 3.97-4.02 (t, 2H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz,
–CH2O–), 6.93-7.27 (m, 4H, Ar–H); 13C NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) d 12.35, 14.04, 20.42, 22.58, 25.98, 29.01, 29.18,
31.75, 68.42, 115.02, 120.95, 127.06, 127.17, 130.48,
149.88, 159.02. ESI-MS m/z 287 [M + 1]+.
2-Ethyl-1-(4-octyloxy)phenyl-1H-imidazole (5o)
Yield 79%; oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 0.87-0.92
(t, 3H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH3), 1.21-1.35 (q, 14H, –CH2–),
1.79-1.84 (d, 2H, J 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 2.60-2.67 (q, 2H, J 6.0,
6.0 Hz, –CH2–), 3.97-4.02 (t, 2H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2O–),
6.93-7.26 (m, 4H, Ar–H); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
d 12.35, 14.05, 20.40, 22.63, 26.01, 29.18, 29.20, 29.31,
31.79, 68.43, 99.96, 115.04, 120.97, 127.06, 130.43,
149.88, 159.04. ESI-MS m/z 301 [M + 1]+.
Results and Discussion
2-Ethyl-1-(4-nonoxy)phenyl-1H-imidazole (5p)
We designed a series of 2-ethyl-1-(4-substituted)
phenyl-1H-imidazole derivatives (5a-5q) and synthesized
them according to Scheme 1. The compound 1, i.e., 2-ethyl
imidazole, was used as the starting material, which was
reacted with p-fluoro nitrobenzene to give compound 2.10,11
The nitro group of compound 2 was converted to an
amino via Pd/C hydrogenation in the presence of H2.
Subsequently, compound 3 was suspended in 25% sulfuric
acid solution and treated with NaNO2 solution to yield the
scaffold 2-ethyl-1-(4-hydroxyl)phenyl-1H-imidazole (4).12
Compound 4 was isolated and further reacted with
appropriate alkyl halides, giving a series of 1-substituted
phenyl-1H-imidazole derivatives. The structures of all
the synthesized compounds were confirmed by 1H NMR,
13C NMR, and mass spectrometry.
All the synthesized compounds were screened for their
in vitro antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria,
S. aureus, and the Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli. MIC
were determined using the serial dilution technique. We
used ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin as reference compounds
in the evaluation of antibacterial activity and measured the
MIC in nmol mL-1.
Yield 80%; oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 0.87-0.91
(t, 3H, J 6.0, 6.0 Hz, –CH3), 1.21-1.29 (q, H, J 9.0, 9.0 Hz,
–CH–), 1.45-1.50 (t, 14H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 1.79-1.84
(t, 2H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 2.20 (s, H, –CH–), 2.59-2.67
(q, 2H, J 9.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 3.97-4.02 (t, 2H, J 6.0,
9.0 Hz, –CH2O–), 6.93-7.26 (m, 6H, Ar–H); 13C NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d 12.35, 14.06, 20.41, 22.64, 26.01,
29.18, 29.23, 29.35, 29.50, 31.85, 68.42, 99.98, 115.04,
120.96, 127.06, 130.44, 149.88, 159.04. ESI-MS m/z 315
[M + 1]+.
2-Ethyl-1-(4-decoxy)phenyl-1H-imidazole (5q)
Yield 82%; oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 0.86-0.91
(t, 3H, J 6.0, 6.0 Hz, –CH3), 1.21-1.28 (q, 15H, J 6.0,
9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 1.48 (s, 2H, –CH2–), 1.79-1.84 (t, 2H, J 6.0,
9.0 Hz, –CH2–), 2.59-2.67 (q, 2H, J 9.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2–),
3.97-4.02 (t, 2H, J 6.0, 9.0 Hz, –CH2O–), 6.93-7.26 (m, 4H,
Ar–H); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 12.35, 14.07, 20.40,
22.65, 26.01, 29.18, 29.28, 29.35, 29.52, 31.87, 68.42,
99.98, 115.04, 120.96, 127.06, 130.43, 149.88, 159.04.
ESI-MS m/z 329 [M + 1]+.

Vol. 29, No. 4, 2018
Sun et al.
705
Scheme 1. Synthesis of target compounds 5a-5q. (a) p-Fluoro nitrobenzene, NaOH, DMSO, 90 °C; (b) H2, Pd/C, ethanol, 60 °C; (c) NaNO2, 30% H2SO4;
(d) RX, NaOH, DMF, 80 °C.
As shown in Table 1, 17 derivatives containing a
benzyl and an alkyl group were designed and synthesized,
providing different space effects and lipid water partition
coefficients. Most of the synthesized compounds showed
modest antibacterial activity in vitro against both
Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains at the level of
nmol mL-1. However, the overall results indicated that the
tested compounds possessed a slightly stronger inhibitory
activity against E. coli, than that against S. aureus.
In-depth analysis of the structure activity relationship of
these structures revealed that the MIC was found to decrease
after the introduction of substituents on the hydroxyl group
of compound 4. This could be explained by their ClogP
values, as it is known that compounds with modest ClogP
can easily cross the cell membrane. Firstly, a study of the
data shown in Table 1 demonstrates that most of the test
compounds exhibited antibacterial activity against S. aureus
(MIC 8-128 nmol mL-1). Among these benzyl-substituted
derivatives, those containing a Cl atom, i.e., 5b (o-Cl) and
5d (p-Cl) were found to be the most active with an MIC
value of 64 nmol mL-1 each, against S. aureus. On the other
hand, derivatives 5e (p-F) and 5g (p-Br) were found to be
less active with a MIC value of 128 nmol mL-1 each, against
S. aureus. Hence, these results showed that the presence
of a halogen atom in the para-position of the benzyl ring
yielded a better inhibitory activity, with the derivative
5b (o-Cl) being an exception. Furthermore, the derivatives
5a, 5c, 5f, and 5h, each having halogen substituents on the
ortho- or meta-position of the benzyl group, exhibited no
inhibition at the dose of 256 nmol mL-1. As compared to
compound 5a, the derivatives with an electron-donating
group (5i, p-CH3) did not improve the inhibitory potency.
A preliminary study suggests that electron-donating groups
may contribute more to the inhibitory activity against
S. aureus than electron-withdrawing groups.
Table 1. Inhibitory activitya of compounds, 4, 5a-5q, and controls against
S. aureus and E. coli
MICb / (nmol mL-1)
Compound
R
ClogPc
vs. S. aureus vs. E. coli
4
H
> 256
> 256
64
> 256
128
32
1.9
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
5f
C6H5CH2
3.89
4.43
4.43
4.43
3.92
3.92
4.32
4.32
(o-Cl)C6H4CH2
(m-Cl)C6H4CH2
(p-Cl)C6H4CH2
(p-F)C6H4CH2
(o-F)C6H4CH2
(p-Br)C6H4CH2
(o-Br)C6H4CH2
> 256
64
64
16
128
128
256
64
> 256
128
5g
5h
> 256
256
(p-CH3)
C6H4CH2
5i
> 256
> 256
4.61
5j
n-C3H7
n-C4H9
64
64
8
8
3.53
3.87
4.89
5.29
5.87
6.45
6.75
7.43
5k
5l
n-C5H11
n-C6H13
n-C7H15
n-C8H17
n-C9H19
n-C10H21
8
4
5m
8
16
16
32
32
32
128
4
5n
16
5o
128
128
> 256
32
5p
Most of the tested derivatives exhibited antibacterial
activity against E. coli in the dose range of 4-256 nmol mL-1.
Compound 4, having no substitution on the phenyl ring,
had a weaker activity against E. coli than compounds with
different substitutions on the phenyl ring, i.e., 5a-5q. As
discussed earlier, the introduction of a benzyl or alkyl group
5q
Amoxicillin
Ciprofloxacin
–
32
b
aAnti-bacterial testing was carried out in triplicate; MIC (minimum
inhibitory concentration) values represent the average of three readings;
cit was calculated on ACD/Labs website.13

706
Synthesis and Antibacterial Evaluation of 2-Ethyl-1-(4-substituted)phenyl-1H-imidazole Derivatives
J. Braz. Chem. Soc.
on compound 4 improves the antibacterial activity against
E. coli. Amongst the derivatives 5a-5i, the compound 5d,
with a p-Cl benzyl group possesses the most potent
inhibitory activity, with an MIC value of 16 nmol mL-1.
Compounds 5b, 5c, and 5d, were found to be active against
E. coli at concentrations of 32, 64, and 16 nmol mL-1,
respectively. This indicated that the position of the halogen
atom on the phenyl ring greatly influenced the antibacterial
activity, with the para-substituted compounds being more
active than the ortho- and meta-substituted compounds.
We also found that the Cl atom contributed more to the
inhibitory activity against E. coli than the Br and F atoms.
Derivative 5i, containing an electron-donating group
(p-CH3), had an MIC value of > 256 nmol mL-1 against
E. coli. Thus, this further illustrated that electron-donating
groups may contribute more to the antibacterial activity
than electron-withdrawing groups.
Analysis of the inhibitory activity of compounds 5j-5q
against S. aureus and E. coli showed that the length of
the alkyl chain appeared to have a direct impact on the
antibacterial activity of the 2-ethyl-1-(4-substituted)
phenyl-1H-imidazole derivatives.As the alkyl chain length
increased starting from 5j onwards, the MIC gradually
decreased, with the compound 5m (with an n-hexyl
substituent), being the most active against S. aureus, and
the compound 5l (with an n-amyl substituent) being the
most active against E. coli. However, this trend was found
to be reversed when the alkyl chain consisted of more than
six carbon atoms. Compound 5l was found to be the most
potent inhibitor with an MIC value of 8 nmol mL-1 against
S. aureus, and 4 nmol mL-1 against E. coli, and showed
comparable activity with the reference agents, ciprofloxacin
and amoxicillin.
Compound 5l was further screened against a range of
Gram-negative bacteria (P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae,
P. vulgaris, S. typhimurium, and P. multocida) and
Gram-positive bacteria (M. luteus, S. pneumoniae,
and S. mutans). These bacteria easily cause severe
infection illness or food poisoning, and at the same time,
they are widely applied to the antimicrobial activity
screening experiments.14-17 Analysis of the data in Table 2
showed that the compound 5l exhibited inhibitory activity
against P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, P. vulgaris, and
S. typhimurium in the entire dose range of 8-256 nmol mL-1,
but was found to be inactive against P. multocida at even
the highest concentration of 256 nmol mL-1. The MIC of 5l
against P. aeruginosa was found to be 8 nmol mL-1, which
was similar to that of the control ciprofloxacin, and lower
than that of amoxicillin. The compound 5l was found to be
as potent as amoxicillin against K. pneumoniae and much
weaker than ciprofloxacin. Notably, the compound 5l showed
a fourfold increase in potency against P. vulgaris as compared
to the controls, ciprofloxacin, and amoxicillin. Meanwhile,
5l exhibited inhibitory activity against S. typhimurium at
128 nmol mL-1, whereas the two controls were found to
be inactive at 256 nmol mL-1. The compound 5l was found
to be active at doses of 64, 8, and 64 nmol mL-1, against
the Gram-positive bacteria, M. luteus, S. pneumoniae, and
S. mutans, respectively. The potency of this activity was
comparable with that of ciprofloxacin against S. pneumoniae.
Table 2. Inhibitory activitya of compound 5l and controls against several
bacterial strains
MICb / (nmol mL-1)
Gram Bacterial strain
5l
8
Amoxicillin Ciprofloxacin
Nc
N
N
N
N
Pd
P
P. aeruginosa
P. multocida
K. pneumoniae
P. vulgaris
32
32
8
256
8
> 256
256
64
256
> 256
> 256
64
256
> 256
32
S. typhimurium
S. mutans
128
64
M. luteus
64
32
128
8
P
S. pneumoniae
8
64
aAnti-bacterial testing was carried out in triplicate; bMIC (minimum
inhibitory concentration) values represent the average of three readings;
cN: Gram-negative; dP: Gram-positive.
Theabovepharmacologicaldatarevealedthatourprevious
design strategy is feasible. The open-chain analogues of
7-alkoxyl-4,5-dihydroimidazo[1,2-a]quinolines (I) retained
the original activity against Gram-negative bacteria and gave
a more potent inhibition of Gram-positive bacteria. Given
the present biological data, such processes can be impacted
by the hydrophobicity of the prepared derivatives. While in
the present study the inclusion of ClogP value in the design
strategy was used as a predictor of crossing of the biological
barrier, it can also be used to determine if hydrophobicity
contributes to the obtained pharmacological results. A
bidirectional analysis between MIC and ClogP value yielded
a good correlation. This may provide instructions for further
structural optimization of imidazole analogues with higher
affinity and better clinical therapeutic properties. Further
investigations on enzyme inhibition, cytotoxicity, and
pharmacokinetic properties are underway in order to confirm
the exact mechanism of antibacterial activity.
Conclusions
In this study, a series of novel 2-ethyl-1-(4-substituted)
phenyl-1H-imidazole derivatives was synthesized and
evaluated for its antibacterial activity against Gram-positive

Vol. 29, No. 4, 2018
Sun et al.
707
and Gram-negative bacterial strains. Most of the prepared
compounds possess antibacterial activity against both these
bacterial strains. Especially, the compound 5l with an MIC
value of 4 nmol mL-1 against E. coli, and 8 nmol mL-1
against S. aureus, was found to be the most potent inhibitor,
and showed an even better activity as compared to the
reference agents, ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin. This
suggests that hybrid compounds containing substituted
imidazole moieties may possess potent antibacterial
properties. The results of this evaluation suggest that further
development of such compounds may be of therapeutic
interest.
4. Chorell, E.; Pinkner, J. S.; Phan, G.; Edvinsson, S.; Buelens,
F.; Remaut, H.; Waksman, G.; Hultgren, S. J.; Almqvist, F.;
J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 5690.
5. Bright, T. J.; Furuya, E. Y.; Kuperman, G. J.; Cimino, J. J.;
Bakken, S.; J. Biomed. Inf. 2012, 45, 120.
6. Mohan, N. R.; Sreenivasa, S.; Manojkumar, K. E.; Rao, T. M.
C.; Thippeswamy, B. S.; Suchetan, P. A.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc.
2014, 6, 1012.
7. Gyssens, I. C.; Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2011, 38 S, 11.
8. Sun, X.Y.; Wu, R.; Wen, X.; Guo, L.; Zhou, C. P.; Li, J.; Quan,
Z. S.; Bao, J.; Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 60, 451.
9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
(NCCLS); Standard Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial
Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria, which Grows Aerobically;
NCCLS, Villanova, 1982, p. 242.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary data (1H and 13C NMR spectra) are
available free of charge at http://jbcs.sbq.org.br as PDF file.
10. Sreedhar, B.; Arundhathi, R.; Reddy, P. L.; Reddy, M. A.;
Kantam, M. L.; Synthesis 2009, 15, 2517.
11. Choudary, B. M.; Sridhar, C.; Kantam, M. L.; Venkanna, G. T.;
Sreedhar, B.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9948.
Acknowledgments
12. Vara Prasad, J. V.; Markoski, L. J.; Boyer, F. E.; Domagala,
J. M.; Ellsworth, E. L.; Gajda, C.; Hagen, S. E.; Tait, B. D.;
Lunney, E. A.; Tummino, P. J.; Ferguson, D.; Holler, T.; Hupe,
D.; Nouhan, C.; Gracheck, S. J.;VanderRoest, S.; Saunders, J.;
Iyer, K.; Sinz, M.; Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 2217.
13. http://www.acdlabs.com/, accessed in May, 2017.
14. Iconaru, S. L.; Prodan, A. M.; Motelica-Heino, M.; Sizaret, S.;
Predoi, D.; Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 576.
We are grateful for the financial support from the
National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant
No. 81502922), Heilongjiang Province Natural Science
Foundation (grant No. QC2014C106), Program forYoung
Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Bayi
Agricultural University (CXRC2016-9), and Heilongjiang
Young College Academic Backbone Project (1252G041).
15. Poole, K.; Krebes, K.; McNally, C.; Neshat, S.; J. Bacteriol.
1993, 175, 7363.
References
16. Domingues, V. O. D.; Hornerari, R.; Reetz, L. G. B.; Kuhn, F.;
Coser, V. M.; Rodrigues, J. N.; Bauchspiess, R.; Pereira, W. V.;
Paraginski, G. L.; Locatelli, A.; Fank, J. D. O.; Giglio, V. F.;
Horner, M.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2010, 12, 2226.
1. Rajanarendar, E.; Nagi Reddy, M.; Rama Krishna, S.; Rama
Murthy, K.; Reddy, Y. N.; Rajam, M.; V.; Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2012, 55, 273.
2. Manjunatha, J. R.; Bettadaiah, B. K.; Negi, P. S.; Srinivas, P.;
Food Chem. 2013, 136, 650.
17. Santos, J. D. O.; Pereira, G. R.; Brandão, G. C.; Borgati, T.
F.; Arantes, L. M.; Paula, R. C. D.; Soares, L. F.; Nascimento,
M. F. A. D.; Ferreira, M. R. C.; Taranto, A. G.; Varotti, F. P.;
Oliveira, A. B. D.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2016, 27, 551.
3. Tukulula, M.; Little, S.; Gut, J.; Rosenthal, P. J.; Wan, B.;
Franzblau, S. G.; Chibale, K.; Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 57,
259.
Submitted: August 23, 2017
Published online: October 19, 2017